home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Socio-economic factors affecting sisal cultivation and adoption in Kiomo Division, Kitui County

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2017
Views (337) Download (8)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Socio-economic factors affecting sisal cultivation and adoption in Kiomo Division, Kitui County

Aaron M. Mwaniki, Daniel P. Kisangau, Nashon K. R. Musimba
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.11( 3), 97-103, September 2017.
Certificate: IJAAR 2017 [Generate Certificate]
Key: AdoptionAwarenessGenderKenyaSisal

Abstract

Sisal cultivation has the potential of contributing immensely towards the economic development of a given country resulting to the improved standards of living. However, despite its potential, farmers are yet to embrace sisal production as one of their economic mainstay. This study examined the factors contributing to the low sisal cultivation and adoption in Kiomo division, Kitui County. During the study, 184 farmers were randomly sampled. Secondary and primary data were used and statistical package for social scientist (SPSS) software was used for data analysis. The study revealed that 57% of the interviewed farmers were aware of sisal cultivation as a commercial activity. The study showed that there was a relationship between gender and awareness of sisal cultivation as a commercial activity (P-Value=0.215>P=0.05). It was also revealed that there was a relationship between the gender and awareness of sisal cultivation as a commercial activity (P value=0.000>0.05). Further, 30.65% of factors identified to be contributing to the low sisal propagation related to lack of knowledge and 0.77% related to financial constraints. This shows that there was association between the awareness of sisal cultivation as a commercial activity and highest level of education (P value=0.332>P=0.05). This study contributes to existing literature on sisal production in the world and Kenya in particular. The analysis of the various restraining factors and driving factors will not only create a good foundation for future research on sisal, but also provide guidance in policy formulation.

VIEWS 14
Cover PDF

Abdullah FA, Samah BA. 2014. Factors Influencing Inclination toward Agriculture Entrepreneurship among Students in Agriculture Learning Institute. Asian Social Science; Vol. 10, No. 2.

ADRA. 2014. Changing the world, one life at a time. ADRA Kenya newsletter, Issue 3.

Anarfi J, Gent S, Iversen V, Khair S, Kwankye S, Addoquaye Tagoe C, Thorsen D, Whitehead A. 2005. Voices of Child Migrants: A better understanding of how life is Sussex: Development Research Centre on Migration, Globalisation and Poverty. Retrieved on 12/09/2017 www.onlineresearchjournals.org

Benjamin D, Bradt L. 2004. Economic growth, poverty and household welfare in Vietnam; vol 842-133.

Dellaert SNC. 2014. Sustainability Assessment of the Production of Sisal Fibre in Brazil, MSC. Thesis, Utrecht University-Unpublished.

Dlamini TS, Verschoor A, Tshabalala P. 2014. An economic viability assessment of sisal production and processing in Limpopo: A stochastic budgeting analysis. Journal of Development and Agricultural Economics, 6(9), 386-393.

FAO. 2008. Sisal. Retrieved October 02, 2016, from www.fao.org/economic/futurefibres/fibres/sisal/

Franco B, Serrano A, Maffioli D, PietrobelliA, Rodolfo SC, Victoria GC, Lucas FG, Elisa G, David G, Andrés M, Lucía P, Alejandro R, Sofía R. 2016. The Impact Evaluation of Cluster Development Programs: Methods and Practices. Inter-American Development Bank, doi.org/10.18235/0000335.

Glewwe G, Zaman H. 2001. Agriculture and Income Distribution in Rural Vietnam under Economic Reforms. ERD Working paper No. 42.

GoK. 2009. Kenya – 1999 Kenya Population and Housing Census (10 Per Cent sample, every 10th household). Retrieved September 03, 2016, from www.statistics.knbs.or.ke/nada/index.php/catalog/56

GoK. 2014. Kitui County Integrated Development Plan 2013-2017: Planning for Sustainable Socio-Economic Growth and Development pp 1-600.

Harvey CA, Rakotobe, ZL, Rao NS, Dave R, Razafimahatratra H, Rabarijohn RH, Rajaofara H, MacKinnon JL. 2014. Extreme vulnerability of smallholder farmers to agricultural risks and climate change in Madagascar. Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society of London. Series B, Biological Sciences, 369(1639), 2013008.

Katani. 2016. Sisal farming in Tanzania. www.katanitz.com. Retrieved 2016-01-23.

Kivaisi A, Assefa B, Hashim S, Mshandete A. 2010. Sustainable utilization of agro-industrial wastes through integration of bio-energy and mushroom production. Nairobi, Kenya ILR.

Kothari CR. 2004. Research Methodology: Methods and Techniques (2nd Ed.), New Age International Publishers, New Delhi India.

Msuya E. 2007. The Impact of Foreign Direct Investment on Agricultural Productivity and PovertyReduction in Tanzania. Munich Personal RePEc Archive, Kyoto University.

Mugenda O, Mugenda A. 2003. Research methods quantitative and qualitative Approaches. Nairobi Acts press.

Muthangya M, Mshandete AM, Kivaisi AK. 2009. Two-Stage Fungal Pre-Treatment for Improved Biogas Production from Sisal Leaf Decortication Residues. International Journal of Molecular Sciences 10(11), 4805-4815.

Orodho AJ. 2003. Essentials of Educational and Social Science Research Method. Nairobi: Masola Publishers.

USGS. 2015. Climate Change Science for a Changing World changing world: Carbon Sequestration to Mitigate Climate, U.S. Geological Survey, Department of the Interior.

Submit Manuscript