Some changes in germination and morphological traits of black seed under different soil types and common bean densities

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2013
Views (954)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Some changes in germination and morphological traits of black seed under different soil types and common bean densities

Soheila Porheidar Ghafarbi, Sirous Hassannejad, Ramin Lotfi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 3(5), 31-35, May 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

A split-factorial experiment on the basis of randomize complete block design with three replications was conducted in 2012, to assess the effects of different common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) densities (0, 1, 2 and 4 per pot) and soil types (soil of wheat and barley fields) on some changes in germination and morphological traits of black seed (Nigella sativa L.). Results indicated that with increasing common bean density in soil of barely field, shoot length of black seed was significantly decreased. However, the lowest shoot length of black seed in soil of wheat field was obtained from the control density of common bean. In both of soil type day up to flowering of black seed was increased with increasing density of common bean. Maximum shoot dry weight and pod number of black seed in soil of barley and wheat fields was recorded under 2 and control density of common bean, respectively. Interaction of soil type and black seed density showed that the most shoot dry weight and day up to germination (germination rate) under barely soil was recorded in 2 densities of black seed. But, under wheat soil, those traits were obtained from 3 and 0 (control) densities. Pod number of black seed with increasing of this plant density was significantly declined.

Atta MB. 2003. Some characteristics of nigella (Nigella sativa L.) seed cultivated in Egypt and its lipid profile. Food Chemistry 83, 63–68.

Buruchara R. 2007. Background information on common bean (Phaseolus vulgaris L.) inbiotechnology, breeding and seed systems for African crops.

Economou GO, Tzakou A, Gani A, Yannitsar O,Bilalis D. 2002. Allelopathic effect of Conyzaalbida. Ecology 17, 2021-2034.

FAO.2005. http://faostat.fao.org/

Hassannejad S, PorheidarGhafarbi S, Lotfi R. 2013. Allelopathic effects of wheat and barley on emergence and seedling growth of some weed species. International Journal of Biosciences 3, 128-134.

Hemss HD, Van J. 1985. The influence of competition on crop yield.Agriculture Systems 18, 81-93.

Kruse M, Strandberg M, Strandberg B. 2000.Ecological Effects of Allelopathic Plants–A Review. National Environmental Research Institute – NERI Technical Report No. 315. Silkeborg, Denmark.

Liu DL, Lovett JV. 1993. Biologically active secondary metabolites of barley. II. Phytotoxicity of barley allelochemicals. Journal of Chemical Ecology 19, 2231-2244.

Nazir T, Uniyal AK, Todari NP. 2007. Allelopathicbehaviour of three medicinal plant species on traditional agriculture crops of Garhwal Himalaya, Indian Agroforestry System 69, 183-187.

Porheidar-Ghafarbi S, Hassannejad S,Lotfi R. 2012 a. Allelopathic Effects of Wheat seed extracts on seed and seedling growth of eight selected weed species. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 4, 1452-1457.

Porheidar-Ghafarbi S, Hassannejad S, Lotfi R. 2012 b. Seed to Seed Allelopathic Effects between Wheat   and   Weeds.   International   Journal   of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 4, 1660-1665.

Rice  EL.  1984.  Allelopathy,  2nd  Ed.  Academic Press, New York. 421p.

Turk MA, TawahaAM. 2002. Inhibitory effects of aqueous  extracts  of  barley  on  germination  and growth of lentil. Pakistan Journal of Agronomy 1, 28-30.

Xuan TD, Tawata S, Hong NH, Khanh TD, Chung IM. 2004. Assessment of phytotoxic action of  Ageratum  conyzoides  L.(billy  goat  weed)  on weeds. Crop Protection 23, 915–922.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.