Stady of the effective factors on social forestry in the vegetation kabirkoh areas (Case Study: Dareshahr County)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2014
Views (127) Download (6)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Stady of the effective factors on social forestry in the vegetation kabirkoh areas (Case Study: Dareshahr County)

Somaye Zeinivand-Nejad, Ali Roatami, Mehdi Heydari
J. Bio. Env. Sci.5( 4), 250-258, October 2014.
Certificate: JBES 2014 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Social forestry is a common effort aiming at the formation of forest production along with reserving forestry natural resources in long term for whole community to get benefit. The main objective behind the present study of factors influencing social forestry in the vegetative kabirkoh areas (case study: darreshar county). This descriptive–applied research is considered as a causative – relative study. The findings revealed that there is a direct and meaningful relationship among age, the namber of family members, marriag, educational level, employment, main job, yearly income, relational factors, developmental factors, social and cultural factors, and rustic political factors, and their participation in social forestry variables. As well there is not any meaningful relationship between gender, land ownership and the consuming fuel variables. As well, job situation, main job, behavioral relations, developments, political, social and cultural have been identified and in vestigated in a regression logestic way in which its sixth step has been reported and they show the meaningfulness of the variables. The results show that social and cultural factors, relational and developmental factors, and individual characteristics have a positive impact upon rural participation in social forestry variables.

VIEWS 1

Ebrahimpour M. 1999. Human factors affecting forests destruction and natural resources with special emphasis on Zagros. Jehad scientific journal. 19 th year, No 232-233, p:32.

FAO 1992. Forest and cultures in Asia. Workshop and project proposal on focus. Regional unit of social and Human sciences in Asia and the pacific. Bangkok.

Fisher M. 2004. Household welfare and forest dependence in southern Malawi, Environment and development economics. Cambridge University Press 9, 135-154.

Heydari M, khusropure A, Hosseiny SA, rezaei D. 2010. The study of people is social and economic situation living in Zagros middle forests and it, s impact on natural resources destruction (case study: Shirvan chardavol).

Hosseiny F, Aboyieh F. 2000. Attracting people participation methods in natural resources for protecting natural resources in every country. A collection of the 1st conference of development and participation of natural resources, the office of promotion and public cooperation in jehad ministry, 677-678.

Mirakzadeh AA, Baharmi M, Ghiasy F. 2011. Analysis of the effective factors on sustainable exploitation of forests wood (case study: Dejhen village in Kamyaran County), journal of Forest and wood products (JFWP), Iranian journal of Natural Resources 64, 91-106. (In Persian)

Mirrajabi H, yakhkeshi H, emadian E, fallah F. 2007. The role of management in improving economical and social situation of rural living in forests. Magazine of forest and natural resources, No 71, p 26

Raizada A, Dogra P, Dhyani BL. 2008. Assessment of a multi-objective decision support system generated land use plan on forest fodder dependency in a Himalayan watershed, Environmental modeling and software 23, 1171-1181.

Rezvanfare A. 2002. Public participation in social forests. The presented article in natural resources conference. Participation and development of forests organizations, Ramsar.

Shaditalab Zh. 1999. Social forestry. Social scince project planning, Tehran University.

Shaeri A. 2000. The influential factors in attracting ranchmen in organizing sheep in Iran north forest the 1st natural resources conference, Participation and development, p 162.

Shariati MR, Ziadbakhsh S, Varamini N. 2005. The factors which affect on participating forest rural people in conservation of the factors in the North and West of Iran, Forest and Rangeland journal 67, 47-57.

Thamari D, Heydari M. 2006. Designing a proper pattern about social forest promotion in the realm of zagros growth area. Agricultur promotional and scientific Journal, 11th year 3, 31-47

World Bank 2001. A revised forest strategy for the World Bank group. Washington D.C., World commission on environment and development (WCED), 1987, our common future, Oxford: Oxford University Press.1-65p

Yakhkeshi A. 2001. Nations talks and understanding. Mazandaran university cultural and scientific publication, p. 148.