Studies on genetic variability in maize (Zea mays L.) under stress and non-stress environmental conditions

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2015
Views (522)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Studies on genetic variability in maize (Zea mays L.) under stress and non-stress environmental conditions

U.U. Umar, S.G. Ado, D.A. Aba, S.M. Bugaje
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 7(1), 70-77, July 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Studies were carried out to estimate the extent of genetic variability in fifty six maize (Zea mays L.) genotypes (6 drought tolerant inbred lines, 7 other inbred lines, 42 crosses and a check) under non-stress and water stress at flowering. The genotypes were evaluated in 2012/2013 dry season across two locations, to obtain more information on their genetic and morphological diversity. The experimental design used was simple lattice design with two replications under each condition. Significant mean squares were obtained for the seven traits measured under non-stress and water stress in the combined analysis across locations. Differences observed in means of most traits studied were high. The highest mean value of 5877.80 kg/ha was produced the hybrid S3 x P2 for grain yield under non-stress across location while under water stress the hybrid S7 x P8 had maximum grain yield of 5877.80 kg/ha. The effect of drought stress on morphological traits was drastic and it significantly reduced the expression of most traits. Overall, plant height, ear height, number of ears per plant and grain yield were reduced by 15 %, 20 %, 28 % and 70 %, respectively, whereas, days to 50 % tasseling, days to 50 % silking and anthesis-silking interval increased by 5 %, 6 % and 33 %, respectively, under water stress. These findings will be useful in planning breeding programmes to develop improved maize varieties, synthetics and hybrids tolerant to drought for use by farmers and industries.

Acquaah G. 2007. Principles of plant genetics and breeding. Oxford, UK: Blackwell publishing Ltd, 146-151.

Ajala SO, Ago CE, Olaoye G. 2009. Comparison of predicted responses to three types of recurrent selection procedures for the improvement of maize (Zea mays L.) population. Journal of plant breeding and crop science 1, 289-292.

Allard RW, Bradshaw AD. 1964. Implications of genotype-environmental interactions in applied plant breeding. Crop Science 4, 503-508

Ashofteh BM, Ebrahimi M, Mostafavi K, Golbashy M, Khavari KS. 2011. A study of morphological basis of corn (Zea mays L.) yield under drought stress condition using correlation and path coefficient analysis. Journal of cereals and oilseeds 2, 32-37.

Badu-Apraku B, Fakorede MAB, Menkir A, Kamara AY, Dapaah S. 2005. Screening maize for drought tolerance in the Guinea savanna of West and Central Africa. Cereal Research Communique 33, 533-540.

Banziger M, Diallo AO. 2004. Progress in developing drought and N stress tolerant maize cultivars for Eastern and Southern Africa. In: Friesen, D.K. and Palmer, A.F.E. ed. Integrated Approaches to Higher Maize Productivity in the New Millenium. Proceedings of the 7th Eastern and Southern Africa Regional Maize Conference, 5-11 February, 2002. CIMMYT/KARI, Nairobi, Kenya, 189-194.

Banziger M, Edmeades GO, Beck D, Bellon M. 2000. Breeding for Water stress and N Stress Tolerance in Maize: From Theory to Practice. CIMMYT, Mexico, D.F., Mexico, 1-67.

Bassetti P, Westgate ME. 1993. Senescence and receptivity of maize silks. Crop Science 33, 275-278.

Betran FJ, Beck D, Banziger M, Edmeades GO. 2003. Genetic analysis of inbred and hybrid grain yield under stress and non-stress environments in tropical maize. Crop Science 43, 807- 817.

Bolanos J, Edmeades GO. 1993. Eight cycles of selection for drought tolerance in tropical maize. II. Responses in reproductive behaviour. Field Crops Research 31, 253-268.

DeVries J, Toenniessen G. 2001. Securing the harvest: biotechnology, breeding and seed systems for African crops. Wallingford, UK: CABI Publishing.

Duncans D. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F-tests. Biometrics 11, 42.

Hussain I, Ahsan M, Saleem M, Ahmed A. 2009. Gene action studies for agronomic traits in maize under normal and water stress conditions. Pakistan Journal of Agricultural Science 46, 108-112.

Maleki A, Fazel S, Naseri R, Rezaei K, Heydari M. 2014. The effect of potassium and zinc sulphate application on grain yield of maize under drought stress conditions. Advances in environmental biology 8, 890-093.

NeSmith DS, Ritchie JT. 1992. Effects of soil water deficits during tassel emergence on development and yield components of maize (Zea mays L.). Field Crops Research 28, 251-256.

Saleem S, Tahir HN, Saleem U. 2011. Study of genetic variability in maize inbred lines under irrigated and drought conditions. International journal agriculture and applied science 3, 80-85.

SAS Institute Inc. 2004. SAS/STAT 9.1 user’s guide. SAS Institute Inc., Cary, 5121.

USAID. 2010. Packages of practice for maize production. United States Agency for International Development, 23.

USDA. 2010. World of corn. Washington, DC: United States Department of Agriculture, 7-8.

Related Articles

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.

Pruning and population density as smart solution to sustainable tomato production

Reychel I. Wamel, Artemio A. Martin Jr., Victoriano V. Casco, Lucila V. Rocha, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 99-112, May 2025.