home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Studies on various factors affecting female sex pheromone release in Xanthopimpla predator – A pupalparasitoid of tasar silkworm

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2017
Views (262) Download (14)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Studies on various factors affecting female sex pheromone release in Xanthopimpla predator – A pupalparasitoid of tasar silkworm

Lakshmi Marepally, G. Benarjee
Int. J. Biosci.11( 3), 126-134, September 2017.
Certificate: IJB 2017 [Generate Certificate]
Key: AgeDensityGC–EADPheromone extractWhite sugar syrup

Abstract

Xanthopimpla pedator is a serious pupal parasitoid on tasar cocoons and the infestation has become an increasing problem to sericulture industry. Insecticides are costly, build up large amount of chemicals in the environment and finally disrupt the balance of the ecosystem. Extraction of female sex pheromones and application in mating disruption is an alternative approach to insecticide treatment. The virgin female Xanthopimpla pedator pheromone gland extract activity and factors influencing sex pheromone production were studied under laboratory conditions. Present wind tunnel experiment show that most of the females started calling from thestarting of photo phase (13ng/h). Maximum calling (825ng/h) occurred between the second and fourth hours of the photo phase period (10am to 12 pm).Volatiles were collected in U tube immersed in liquid nitrogen. Gas chromatographic–electroantennogram detection (GC–EAD) analysis of these female extracts indicated the presence of five peaks or five volatile compounds (A,B,C,D,E) to which the male antenna responded. Active response was noted with B volatile. Pheromone production started in one day old female Xanthopimpla (0.6µg/day), reached maximum on 7th day (9.6µg/day) and decreased later as the female Xanthopimpla increased in age. The density of female Xanthopimpla has no impact on total pheromone production. Xanthopimpla held in one, two and five in number had released same quantity of pheromones. Xanthopimpla fed with white sugar syrup has released maximum pheromones(12.5µg/ female/day)followed by honey fed(10.2µg/ female/day) and normal water fed(3.6µg/ female/day).An efficient female pheromone isolation is of importance in mating disruption which helps to develop new control methods for prevention of the infestation in tasar cocoons.

VIEWS 19
Cover PDF

Ada rafaeli, CarinaGileadi. 1995.Factors affecting pheromone production in the stored product moth, Plodiainterpunctella: A preliminary study. Journal of Stored Products Research 31, 243-247. https://doi.org/10.1016/0022-474X(95)00008-U.

Alexandre Jordao L, Octavio Nakano, Vanderly Janeiro. 2010. Adult carbohydrate feeding affects reproduction of Phthorimaea operculalla (Zeller) (Lepidoptera: Gelechiiidae). Neotropical Entomolology 39, 315-318. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S1519566x2010000300001.

Allison J, Carde RT. 2006.Heritable variation in the sex pheromone of the almond moth, Cadra cautella. Journal of Chemical Ecology 32, 621-641. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10886-005-9019-2.

Blomquist GJ, Jurenka R, Schal C, Tittiger C.2011.Pheromone production: Biochemistry and molecular biology. In insect endocrinology (Ed, L.I. Gilbert), San Diego, CA: Academic press, 523-567.

Brien O, Boggs DM, Fogel ML. 2004.Making eggs from nectar: the role of life history and dietary carbon turnover in butterfly reproductive resource allocation. Oikos 105, 279-291. http://www.jstor.org/stable/3548089.

Casimero V, Nakasuji F, Fujisaki K. 2001.The influences of larval and adult food quality on the calling rate and pre-calling period of females of the cotton bollworm, Helicoverpa armigera Hübner (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae). Applied Entomology Zoology 36, 33-40.

Ceasar Ruiz montiel, Julio rojas C, Leopoldo Cruz lopez, Hector Gonzalez, Hernandez. 2009. Factors affecting pheromone release by Scyphophorus acupunctatus (Coleoptera: Curculionidae). Environmental Entomology 38, 1423-1428. https://doi.org/10.1603/022.038.0510.

Cork A, Alam SN, Talekar NS. 2005. Development and commercialization of mass trapping for control of brinjal borer, Leucinodes orbonalis in South Asia, Proc. National Symposium. Recent Advances in integrated management of brinjal shoot and fruit borer, Indian institute of vegetable research, Varanasi, India, 29-33.

Devigne C, Broly P, Deeubourg JL. 2011. Individual preferences and social interactions determine the aggregation of wood lice. Plos ONE 6, 173-189. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0017389.

Fauvergue X, LoGenco A, Lo Pinto M. 2007. Virgins in the wild: Mating status affects the behaviour of a parasitoid foraging in the field. Oecologia 156, 913-920. https://doi.org/10.1007/s00442-008-1037-7.

Foster SP, Anderson KG. 2011.The use of mass isotopomer distribution analysis to quantify synthetic rates of sex pheromone in the moth Heliothis virescens. Journal of Chemical Ecology 37, 1208-1210. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10886-011-0035-0.

Foster SP, Anderson KG. 2012.Synthetic rates of key stored fatty acids in the biosynthesis of sex pheromone in the moth Heliothis virescens. Insect Biochemistry Molecular Biology 42, 865-872. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb.2012.08.004.

Foster SP, Johnson CP. 2010. Feeding and hemolymphtrehalose concentration influence sex pheromone production in virgin Heliothis virescens moths. Journal of Insect Physiology 56, 1617-1623. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jinsph/s.2010.06.002.

Harari AR, Zahavi T, Thiery D. 2011. Fitness cost of pheromone production in signaling female moths. Evolution 65, 1572-1582. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1558-5646.2011.01252.x.

Jurenka R. 2003.Insect pheromone biochemistry and molecular biology. Oxford: Elsevier Academic press. Biochemistry of female moth sex pheromones, 53-80.

Kassim NF, Webb CE, Russell RC. 2012. The importance of males: larval diet and adult sugar feeding influences reproduction in Culex molestus. Journal of American  Mosquito Control Association 28, 312-316. https://doi.org/10.2987/12-6274R.1

Lakshmi Marepally, Benarjee  G. 2017. Identification and behavioural evaluation of sex pheromone in Xanthopimpla predator– A serious pupalparasitoid of tropical tasar silkworm Anthereae mylittadrury. Hayathi Journal of Biosciences 23, 185-190. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.hjb.2017.01.002.

Lakshmi Velide, Bhagavanulu  MVK. 2012. Study on infestation of Xanthopim plapedator on the cocoons of tropical tasar silkworm Anthereae mylittadrury. International Journal of Plant Animal and Environemntal Sciences 2, 139-142. https://dx.doi.org/10.21276/ijpaes.

Mathur SK, Shukla RM. 1998.Rearing of tasar silkworm. Indian Textile 86, 68-77.

Pierre Broly, Romain Mullier, Jean Louis Deneubourg, Cedric Devigne. 2012. Aggregation in woodlice: Social interaction and density effects. Zookeys 176, 133-144. https://doi.org/10.3897/zookeys.176.2258.

Rafaeli A, Zakharova T, Lapsker Z, Jurenka RA. 2003. The identification of an age- and female specific putative PBAN membrane receptor protein in pher omone glands of Helicover paarmigera: possible upregulation by juvenile harmone. Insect Biochemistry Molecular Biology 33, 371-380. https://doi.org/10.1016/S0965-1748(02)00264-3.

Robert Holdcraft, Cesar Rodriguez Saona, Lukasz L, Stelinski. 2016.Pheromone Autodetection: Evidence and Implications. Insects 7, 1-29. https://doi.org/10.3390/insects7020017.

Ruther J. 2013.Novel insights into pheromone-mediated communication in parasitic hymenopterans. In chemical ecology of insect parasitoids, John Wiley and sons, Ltd, Chichester, UK, 112-144.

Sallam HA, Abd El-Rahman, Hussein HA, Hazaa MA. 2000.Factors Affecting Sex Pheromone Production in Female Cotton Leaf Worm Moth, Spodoptera Littoralis (Boisd.), Proc 7th Conference of Nuclear Sciences & Applications, Cairo, Egypt,1276-1281.

Salma Mazid, Jogen Kalita Ch, Ratul Rajkhowa Ch. 2011.A review on the use of biopesticides in insect pest management. International Journal of Scientific Advanced Technology 1(1), 69-178.

Singh UN, Rajnarain, Chakravorthy D, Tripathi PN. 2010. Sex preference in host parasitisation of Xanthopimpla  predator fabricus (Hymenoptera: Ichneuminidae)a major parasitoid of tasar silkworm, Anthereae mylitta Drury. Sericologia 50, 369-378.

Singh RN, Bajpayee CM, Jayaswal J, Thangavelu. 1992. Perspective of biological control in tasarculture. Indian silk 31, 48-50.

Spurgeon DW. 2003. Age dependence of pheromone production by the boll weevil (coleoptera: curculionidae). Environmental Entomology 32, 31-38. https://doi.org/10.1603/0046-225X-32.1.31.

Srivastava KP, Dhaliwal GS. 2012. A Textbook of Applied Entomology, Vol 1, Concepts in pest management, Kalyani publishers, India, 439.

Stephen Foster. 2009. Sugar feeding via trehalosehaemolymph concentration affects sex pheromone production in mated Heliothis virescens moths. The Journal of Experimental Biology 212, 2789-2794. https://doi.org/10.1242/jeb.030676.

Symonds MRE, Elgar MA. 2008. The evolution of pheromone diversity. Trends in Ecology Evolution 23, 220-228. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tree.2007.11.009.

Tisdale RA, Sappington TW. 2001. Realised and potential fecundity, egg fertility and longevity of laboratory-reared female beet armyworm (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) under different adult diet regimes. Annals of Entomological Society of America 94, 415-419. https://doi.org/10.1603/0013-8746.

Tsfadia O, Azrielli  A, Falach L, Zada A, Roelofs WL, Rafaeli A. 2008. Pheromone biosynthetic pathways: PBAN-regulated rate-limiting steps and differential expression of desaturase genes in moth species. Insect Biochemistry Molecular Biology 38, 552–567. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ibmb2008.01.005.

Wadhams LJ. 1990. The use of coupled gas chromatography electrophysiological techniques in the identification of insect pheromones, In Mc-Caffery AR, Wilson ID. (Eds), Chromatography and isolation of insect harmones and pheromones, Plenum Press, Newyork,289-298.

Walter Eanes F, Thomas JS, Merritt, Jonathan M. 2006. Flux control and excess capacity in the enzymes of glycolysis and their relationship to flight metabolism  in Drosophila melanogaster. PNAS 103, 19413-19418. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0607095104.

Submit Manuscript