Support services provided to top rice producing farmers in irrigated ecosystem in Cagayan Province

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/11/2020
Views (235) Download (31)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Support services provided to top rice producing farmers in irrigated ecosystem in Cagayan Province

Josie Y Bas-ong
Int. J. Biosci.17( 5), 217-224, November 2020.
Certificate: IJB 2020 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

This research study on the support services provided to top rice-producing farmers in the irrigated ecosystem in Cagayan province meant in determining the effectiveness of support services provided to rice farmers. This research study made use of a descriptive design. It was conducted in the seven barangays taken from three municipalities identified as the consistent top rice-producing municipalities and barangays in Cagayan Province in the past five (5) years who are tilling irrigated farms. The study results revealed that the top producing irrigated rice farmers in Cagayan province are in their middle age, males and all attended formal schooling with five members of the family. Farmer respondents have been in farming for more than two decades. They own the land they till with an average of 2.64 hectares and generate a yield of 4.2 tons and 3.7 tons during the dry and wet season. Most of the farmers availed the services of the National Irrigation Administration where they declared as very sufficient. The irrigated rice farmer respondents have received support services like; technical and farm inputs, training, IEC materials from the Department of Agriculture Region 02, Local Government Units, and Farmer-Led Extensionist. They also received technical assistance Moreover, respondents attended various trainings pertaining to rice production offered in their respective municipalities and barangays by government agencies. On the other hand, the different support service providers’ extension modalities were assessed as effective, fair and not effective to few.

VIEWS 21

Alam AF, Begum H, Masud MM, Al-Amin AQ, Leal Filho W. 2020. Agriculture insurance for disaster risk reduction: A case study of Malaysia. International Journal of Disaster Risk Reduction 47, p.101626.

Bohra-Mishra P, Oppenheimer M, Cai R, Feng S, Licker R. 2017. Climate variability and migration in the Philippines. Population and environment 38(3), pp. 286-308.

Ferreira AJD, Guilherme RIMM, Ferreira CSS. 2018. Urban agriculture, a tool towards more resilient urban communities?. Current Opinion in Environmental Science & Health 5, pp.93-97.

Garcia FCC, Retamar AE, Javier JC. 2016. November. Development of a predictive model for on-demand remote river level nowcasting: Case study in Cagayan River Basin, Philippines. In 2016 IEEE Region 10 Conference (TENCON) (pp. 3275-3279). IEEE.

Liu Z, Zhao Y, Colin C, Siringan FP, Wu Q. 2009. Chemical weathering in Luzon, Philippines from clay mineralogy and major-element geochemistry of river sediments. Applied Geochemistry 24(11), pp.2195-2205.

Malapit H, Ragasa C, Martinez EM, Rubin D, Seymour G, Quisumbing A. 2020. Empowerment in agricultural value chains: mixed methods evidence from the Philippines. Journal of Rural Studies 76, pp.240-253.

Mishra AK, Khanal AR, Mohanty S. 2017. Gender differentials in farming efficiency and profits: The case of rice production in the Philippines. Land use policy 63, pp.461-469.

Principe JA. 2012. Exploring climate change effects on watershed sediment yield and land cover-based mitigation measures using swat model, RS and GIS: case of Cagayan River Basin, Philippines. Int. Arch. Photogram. Rem. Sens. Spatial Inform. Sci 39, pp.193-198.

Ramirez PJ, Narvaez TA, Santos-Ramirez EJ. 2020. Gender-inclusive value chains: the case of seaweed farming in Zamboanga Peninsula, Philippines. Gender, Technology and Development 24(1), pp.110-130.

Rasheed A, Mwalupaso GE, Abbas Q, Tian X, Waseem R. 2020. Women Participation: A Productivity Strategy in Rice Production. Sustainability 12(7), p.2870.

Simoncini R, Ring I, Sandström C, Albert C, Kasymov U, Arlettaz R. 2019. Constraints and opportunities for mainstreaming biodiversity and ecosystem services in the EU’s Common Agricultural Policy: Insights from the IPBES assessment for Europe and Central Asia. Land use policy 88, p.104099.