Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Suppressing weed biomass as influenced by seeding rate in wheat/faba bean intercropping system

Research Paper | August 1, 2012

| Download 1

Ibrahim Yahuza

Key Words:

Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.2( 8), 77-87, August 2012


IJAAR 2012 [Generate Certificate]


The effect of seeding rate (sr), sulphur fertilization and intercropping on weed suppression in wheat (Triticum aestivum L.)/faba bean (Vicia faba L; bean) intercropping system is not well investigated. Field experimentswere carried out to study the effects of wide sr (0-650 wheat seeds/m2; not in all experiment) in addition to the other aforementioned cultural practices on weed suppression or weed biomass. Without the application of herbicide, weeds were suppressed well at the higher wheat sr under both the conventional and organic management system. However, in three other conventional experiments when herbicide was applied these benefits were reduced substantially. Averaged across wheat sr in one-experiment weed biomasses found were 185 g/m2 and 36 g/m2 for without and with bean treatment respectively. However, for the combined effects of wheat sr and bean treatment, compared to the sole crop with the highest wheat sr, intercropping was poorer than sole crop in controlling weeds, in several but not all experiments. Nevertheless in one experiment at 10-wheat seeds/m2, weed biomass were 336 g/m2 and 53 g/m2 for the wheat sole crop and intercrop (40-bean seeds/m2) respectively. Thus, illustrating the practical benefits of using both sr and intercropping to suppress weeds at the lower densities. Sulphur fertilization had less effect on weed biomass. In general, this research suggests that weeds have the capacity to reduce crop resource use at the lower densities. Consequently, it is necessary to control weeds by manipulating sr and/or intercropping to allow more resources to be intercepted by the crop.


Copyright © 2012
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Suppressing weed biomass as influenced by seeding rate in wheat/faba bean intercropping system

Banik P, Midya A, Sarkar BK, Ghose SS. 2006. Wheat and chickpea intercropping system in an additive series experiment; advantages and weed smothering. European Journal of Agronomy 24, 325-332.

Barros  JFC, Basch  G, deCarvalho  M. 2007. Effect of reduced doses of a post emergence herbicide to control grass and broad-leaved weeds in no-till wheat under Mediterranean conditions. Crop Protection 26, 1538-1545.

Baumann DT, Bastiaans L, Kropff MJ. 2001. Competition and crop performance in a leek-celery intercropping system. Crop Science 41, 764-774.

Blackshaw RE, Brandt RN, Janzen HH, Entz T, Grant CA, Derksen DA. 2003. Differential response of weed species to added nitrogen. Weed Science 51, 532-539.

Blackshaw RE, Molnar LJ, Larney FJ. 2005. Fertilizer, manure and compost effects on weed growth and competition with winter wheat in western Canada. Crop Protection 24, 971-980.

Bradley CA, Wax LM, Ebelhar SA, Bollero GA, Pedersen WL. 2001. The effect of fungicide seed protectants, seeding rates and reduced rates of herbicides on no till soybean. Crop Protection 20, 615-622.

Bulson HAJ, Snaydon RN, Stopes CE. 1997. Effects of plant density on intercropped wheat and field beans in an organic farming system. Journal of Agricultural Sciences 128, 59-71.

Chikowo R, Faloya V, Petit S, Munier-Jolain NM. 2009. Integrated weed management systems allows reduced reliance on herbicides and long term weed control Agriculture Ecosystems and Environment 132, 237-242.

Gooding MJ, Kasyanova E, Ruske R, Hauggaard-Nielsen H, Jensen ES, Dahlmann C, Von Fragstein P, Dibet A, Corre-Hellouu G, Crozat Y, Pristeri A, Romeo M, Monti M, Launay M. 2007. Intercropping with pulses to concentrate nitrogen and sulphur in wheat. Journal of Agricultural Science 145, 469-479.

Haymes R, Lee HC. 1999. Competition between autumn and spring planted grain intercrops of wheat (Triticum aestivum) and field bean (Vicia faba). Field crops Research 62,167-176.

Korres NE, Froud-Williams RJ. 2002. Effects of winter wheat cultivars and seed rate on the biological characteristics of naturally occurring weed flora. Weed Research 42, 417-428.

Lammerts Van Bueren ET, Struik PC, Jacobsen E. 2002. Ecological concept in organic farming and their consequences for an organic crop ideotype. Netherlands Journal of Agricultural Science 50, 1-26.

Mason H, Navabi A, Frick BO, Donovan J, Spaner D. 2007. Cultivar and seeding rate effects on the competitive ability of spring cereals grown under organic production in Canada. Agronomy Journal 99, 1199-1207.

Mennan H, Zandstra BMH. 2005. Effect of wheat (Triticum aestivum) cultivars and seeding rate on yields loss from Galium aparine (cleavers). Crop Protection 24, 1061-1067.

Murphy KM, Dawson JC, Jones SS. 2008. Relationship among phenotypic growth traits, yield and weed suppression in spring wheat landraces and modern cultivars Field Crops Research 105, 107-115.

Qasem JR. 2007. Chemical control of wild-oat (Avena sterilis L.) and other weeds in wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) in Jordan. Crop Protection 26, 1315-1324.

Sahile S, Fininsa C, Sakhuja PK, Ahmed S. 2008. Effect of mixed cropping and fungicides on chocolate spot (Botrytis fabae) of faba bean (Vicia faba) in Ethiopia. Crop Protection 27, 275-282.

Salvagiotti F, Miralles DJ. 2008. Radiation interception, biomass production and grain yield as affected by the interaction of nitrogen and sulfur fertilization in wheat. European Journal of Agronomy 28, 282-290.

Salvagiotti F, Castellarin JM, Miralles DJ, Pedrol HM. 2009. Sulfur fertilization improves nitrogen use efficiency in wheat by increasing nitrogen uptake. Field Crops Research 113, 170-177.

Scherer HW. 2001. Sulphur in crop production. European Journal of Agronomy 14, 81-111.

Shili-Touzi I, De Tourdonnet S, Launay M, Dore T. 2010. Does intercropping winter wheat (Tritium aestivum) with red fescue (festuca rubra) as a cover crop improve agronomic and environmental performance? A modelling approach. Field Crops Research 116, 218-229.

Vandermeer J. 1989. The Ecology of intercropping. Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University press.