Tetraploid monogerm lines as maternal components of sugar beet hybrids

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2016
Views (264) Download (4)

Tetraploid monogerm lines as maternal components of sugar beet hybrids

Georgi Kikindonov, Stanimir Enchev
Int. J. Biosci.8( 5), 212-218, May 2016.
Certificate: IJB 2016 [Generate Certificate]


Tetraploid monogerm lines of sugar beet with pollen sterility and their hybrid combinations with diploid multigerm pollinators are the object of the present study. Data received for the sterility of the lines and the percentage of the hybrids in their progeny confirm the thesis, that almost a full hybridization is obtained in this type of crosses, even in cases of partial pollen sterility of the female components. This is due to the higher fertilization ability of the pollinators’ haploid pollen. The lower germination of the seeds formed on the tetraploid male-sterile components, is consequence of the growth of the pericarp, containing substances – inhibitors of the germination. The high germination levels of the tested crosses prove that by means of some breeding methods this basic disadvantage of the monogerm tetraploids in hybridization could be overcome. In the field tests the hybrid combinations of the tested tetraploid monogerm male steriles demonstrate significantly higher sugar content and output than the Standard of certified varieties. The high relative values of the white sugar yield from the hybrid combinations are indicative for the good combining ability of the studied tetraploid lines. This proves the expedience of tetraploid monogerm male steriles use in the sugar beet hybrid breeding. apply half of conventional consumption of chemical fertilizers along with Azotobacter and Pseudomonas.


Antonov I. 1981.Testing the combining ability of sugar beet breeding materials. Genetics and Breeding 14(4), 316-320.

Antonov I. 1997. Basic trends in the breeding of monogerm male sterile lines of sugar beet. Plant science 34(7-8), 24-27.

Balkov IY. 1990. CMS of the sugar beet. Agropromizdat, Moscow, 200-204.

Bosemark NO. 2006. Genetics and Breeding In: Draycott AP. (Ed.) Sugar Beet, Oxford UK Blackwell Publishing Ltd, 50-88. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/9780470751114.ch.4

Fitzgerald P. 1977. Influence of the crossing direction on the agronomic performance of sugar beet triploids. Irish Journal of Agricultural Research 16 (2), 231-238.

Kikindonov Tz. 1999. Use of flowcytometric analysis for determination of the ploidy level of sugar beet. Proceedings of Jubilee Scientific Session of Shumen University, Shumen 1999, 145-149.

Konoshita T. 1994. Genetic basis of cytoplasmic male sterility in sugar beet. Proceedings of Japanese Society of Sugar Beet Technologists 36, 213-229.

Lidanski T. 1988. Statistical Methods in Biology and Agriculture. Zemizdat, Sofia 231-270.

Magassy L. 1980. Results and possibilities in the breeding of tetraploid monogerm sugar beet. Proceedings of 43-rd Winter Congress of I.I.R.B., Bruxelles, 227-232.

Pfeiffer OP. 1978. Bestimmung und Interpretation der Kombination seignung von MS und Bestauber populationen und ihre Einbeziehur in die Hybridzuchtung. Archiv fur Zuchtungforschung 8 (4), 483-490.

Zakhariev A, Mihaylov V. 1977. Study of the possibility for use of male-sterile tetraploid forms with incomplete pollen sterility in the hybrid seed production of the sugar beet. Genetics and Breeding 10(10), 246-249.

Zakhariev A, Mihaylov V. 1987. Heterosis manifestation on triploid and tetraploid level of hybrids of monogerm MS 4x population with multigerm diploid and tetraploid pollinators of sugar beet. Genetics and Breeding 20(1), 36-40.