The development of new cities on environmental impact assessment

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2014
Views (599)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The development of new cities on environmental impact assessment

Kourosh Mojavery Samak, Reza Kakvan, Behnam Ghanami, Shaghayegh DelfanAzari
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 5(1), 638-646, July 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Environment effects evaluation can be used by planners and urban development managers as a tool for recognition survey and comparison of different urban development effects. the suitable effect evaluation method for this kind of development Ulrich includes a variety of activities is an Iranian Leopold matrix that measures each activitys effect on different environment components and gives it a number between -5 (very bad or destructive) and +5 (very good or useful). The most important negative effects of New Cities in construction level considering its location and environmental specification are changing the natural land shape changing the valleys morphology changing the natural hydrology system plant and animal settlement destruction and cutting the animal immigrative paths. In population habitancy level the most important effects on spate behaviours changing the animal food and immigration. The most important solution for reducing the mentioned problems in construction level are to obey the natural land shape prevention of extra land preparation minimum change in land preventing a long operation level and in population settlement level traffic management. Appropriated disposd sewerage network development keeping natural immigration paths making urban green spaces and a kind of jungle belt to restrict the illegal development.

Booth AG. 1984. Ecology and Planning; The Planning Components, In: Botequilha A. L. and Ahern Jack, 2002, Applying Landscape Ecological Concepts and Metrics in Landscape Planning, Landscape and Urban Planning 59, 65-93.

Botequilha AL, Ahern Jack. 2002. Applying Landscape. Ecological Concepts and Metrics in Landscape Planning, Landscape and Urban Planning 59, 65-93.

Canter L. 1978. Environmental Impact. Assessment, McGraw Hill, New York

Gunderson LH, Holling CS. 2002. Panarchy , first edition, Island Press, Washington, in: Egger, S.,2006, Determining a Sustainable City Model, Environmental Modeling and Software 21,1235-1246.

Hardey Dennis.1991. From GardenCities to New Towns : Campaigning for Town and Country Planning 1899-1946 (Studies in History, Planning and the Environment), Published by Taylor & Francis, ISBN 0419155708, 9780419155706, 340 pages.

Leopold A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac, London: Oxford University Press.

Mc Harg Ian L. 1969. Design with Nature, American Museum of Natural History.

Nouri J, Malmasi S. 2004. Environmental impact assessment of urban development plan by vulnerability model application, International Journal of Environmental Science &Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7-15.

Osborn F, Whittick A. 1979. New Towns, Their Origins, Achievements and Progress, in: Current Book Review Citations 26. Published by H.W. Wilson Co, 1981.

Rees W. 1996. Urban Ecological footprints: Why cities cannot besustainable and why they are a key to sustainability, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 223-248.

Schaffer Frank. 1970. The New Towns Story, London: Published by Mac Gibbon & Kee, 342 pages.

Related Articles

Species richness and conservation status of ferns (Pteridophyta) in Barangay New Casul, Mutia, Zamboanga del Norte

Jay Anne B. Mejos, Aljun P. Pusod, Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 100-107, April 2026.

Dietary Aloe vera improves growth and hematology in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Fatima Khan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 89-99, April 2026.

Intercropping camphor basil shrubs with selected food crops for ecosystem services in the upper midland agroecological zone of Western Kenya

Reuben K. B. Chumba*, Alex Awiti, Francis Namasaka Muyekho, Vitalis Ogemah, Jacob Omollo, Yosef Kidane Gebrehawariat, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 73-88, April 2026.

Surveillance and detection of African swine fever on abbatoir in different municipalities of third district of Cagayan, Philippines

Maricel F. Campanano, John Michael M. Melad, Mary Ann M. Santos*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 65-72, April 2026.

Mobile-based potato leaf disease identifier using ensemble modeling

Karen W. Cantilang*, Laarni M. Ladiao, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 58-64, April 2026.

Diagnostic analysis of pig farms in the North of Côte d’Ivoire: Case of the commune of Korhogo

Seni Kouadio Sylvain*, Kadjo Vincent, Alla Konan Jean Bedel, Yao Koffi Sylvanus Aubert, N’glouan Wadjé Jérôme, Soro Ouation Souleymane, Kouassi Koffi Dongo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 48-57, April 2026.

Coral reef condition in Illana Bay, Zamboanga del Sur, Philippines: Basis for conservation management

Ruel S. Lasagas, Rosanilio M. Yagos*, Edgardo H. Rosales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 40-47, April 2026.

Preliminary floral and faunal species diversity in Maluyo River in Santol, La Union, Philippines

Judith M. Morales*, Analyn V. Sagun, Angelina T. Gonzales, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 26-39, April 2026.