The development of new cities on environmental impact assessment

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2014
Views (652)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The development of new cities on environmental impact assessment

Kourosh Mojavery Samak, Reza Kakvan, Behnam Ghanami, Shaghayegh DelfanAzari
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 5(1), 638-646, July 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Environment effects evaluation can be used by planners and urban development managers as a tool for recognition survey and comparison of different urban development effects. the suitable effect evaluation method for this kind of development Ulrich includes a variety of activities is an Iranian Leopold matrix that measures each activitys effect on different environment components and gives it a number between -5 (very bad or destructive) and +5 (very good or useful). The most important negative effects of New Cities in construction level considering its location and environmental specification are changing the natural land shape changing the valleys morphology changing the natural hydrology system plant and animal settlement destruction and cutting the animal immigrative paths. In population habitancy level the most important effects on spate behaviours changing the animal food and immigration. The most important solution for reducing the mentioned problems in construction level are to obey the natural land shape prevention of extra land preparation minimum change in land preventing a long operation level and in population settlement level traffic management. Appropriated disposd sewerage network development keeping natural immigration paths making urban green spaces and a kind of jungle belt to restrict the illegal development.

Booth AG. 1984. Ecology and Planning; The Planning Components, In: Botequilha A. L. and Ahern Jack, 2002, Applying Landscape Ecological Concepts and Metrics in Landscape Planning, Landscape and Urban Planning 59, 65-93.

Botequilha AL, Ahern Jack. 2002. Applying Landscape. Ecological Concepts and Metrics in Landscape Planning, Landscape and Urban Planning 59, 65-93.

Canter L. 1978. Environmental Impact. Assessment, McGraw Hill, New York

Gunderson LH, Holling CS. 2002. Panarchy , first edition, Island Press, Washington, in: Egger, S.,2006, Determining a Sustainable City Model, Environmental Modeling and Software 21,1235-1246.

Hardey Dennis.1991. From GardenCities to New Towns : Campaigning for Town and Country Planning 1899-1946 (Studies in History, Planning and the Environment), Published by Taylor & Francis, ISBN 0419155708, 9780419155706, 340 pages.

Leopold A. 1949. A Sand County Almanac, London: Oxford University Press.

Mc Harg Ian L. 1969. Design with Nature, American Museum of Natural History.

Nouri J, Malmasi S. 2004. Environmental impact assessment of urban development plan by vulnerability model application, International Journal of Environmental Science &Technology, Vol. 1, No. 1, pp. 7-15.

Osborn F, Whittick A. 1979. New Towns, Their Origins, Achievements and Progress, in: Current Book Review Citations 26. Published by H.W. Wilson Co, 1981.

Rees W. 1996. Urban Ecological footprints: Why cities cannot besustainable and why they are a key to sustainability, Environmental Impact Assessment Review, 223-248.

Schaffer Frank. 1970. The New Towns Story, London: Published by Mac Gibbon & Kee, 342 pages.

Related Articles

In vitro assessment of Bambara groundnut M3 mutant genotypes for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. in the seedling stage in Burkina Faso

Brahime Tingueri*, Souleymane Ouattara, Adjima Ouoba, Romain W. Soalla, Mahamadi Hamed Ouedraogo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 141-149, June 2026.

Impact of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on biochemical and antioxidant enzymes in Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) infesting oil palm

M. Malarvizhi, N. Santhana Bharathi, K. Sujatha*, A. Vijaya Anand, R. Manikandan, J. P. Antony Prabhu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 129-140, June 2026.

Typhoon risk perception and preparedness after Sendong in Bayug Island

Dinah Millendez*, Lex Rei Brendon Hilario, Jay Rey Alovera, Elizabeth Edan Albiento, Melgie Alas, Peter Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 120-128, June 2026.

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.