The economies of scale of catfish pond culture in Banjar Regency, South Kalimantan

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2018
Views (828)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The economies of scale of catfish pond culture in Banjar Regency, South Kalimantan

Irma Febrianty, Emmy Sri Mahreda, Alim Bachri, Fatmawati
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 13(4), 101-108, October 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Catfish pond culture in Banjar Regency has been widely practiced by fish-farmers from various scales of production, however, there was no study that shows comparison of which size is the most cost-effective. Therefore this study is needed to obtain the most cost-effective scale of production to start business with and in contrast to previous studies that only examined one economies of scale. The purpose of this study was to analyze the most cost-effective scale of production in catfish pond culture. The method used in this study is stratifying each scale of production in catfish pond culture. The data were collected by stratified random sampling. The investment criteria at each scale of production were used as the business feasibility analysis. The results showed that the large-scale production has the highest feasibility values (IRR 94,9), this was due to the amount of investments that was invested, and the good business management carried out by the owner based on his 25 years’ fish farming experience. The small-scale production (IRR 94,65) was ranked second in terms of feasibility compared to the medium-scale (IRR 93,9), this was because the small-scale production did not spend a lot of investment costs. In general, small-scale farmers do not incur investment costs for machinery and feed structures, and the ponds built by most respondents are soil-based ponds. The medium-scale production were spending more investment costs for the ponds construction, machinery and feed structures. In conclusion, based on their level of feasibility, the most cost-effective scale of production can be sorted as large, small and medium-scale production.

Andrew J, Hooker S. 2007.  Economic Feasibility of Aquaculture of Spiny Lobsters Jasus edwardsii in Temperate Waters.  Resources, Conservation and Recycling 69, December 2012, Pages 130-140. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1749-7345.2000.tb00695.x

Gray C, Simanjuntak P, Sabur LK, Maspaitella PFL, Varley RCG. 2005. Introduction to Project Evaluation. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.

Rosalina D. 2013. Analysis of Business Feasibility of Catfish Farming in Tarpaulin Ponds in Namang Village, Central Bangka Regency. Maspari Journal, 2014, 6(1), 20-24. Department of Water Resources Management, Faculty of Agriculture, Fisheries and Biology Bangka Belitung University.

Maynou F, Morales-Nin B, Cabanellas-Reboredo M, Palmer M,  García E, Grau AM. 2013. Small-scale fishery in the Balearic Islands (W Mediterranean): A socio-economic approach.  Fisheries Research 139, 11-17.

Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries Director General of Aquaculture. 2012 Aquaculture Directorate.

Litara L. 2015. Analysis of Freshwater Fish Culture in Riau Regency. Journal of Fisheries Dynamics Vol. 30, April 1, 2015.

Barnes-Mauthe M, Oleson KLL, Zafindrasilivonona B. 2013.  The total economic value of small-scale fisheries with a characterization of post-landing trends: An application in Madagascar with global relevance.  Fisheries Research 147, 175-185.

Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia No 13 of 2008. Regarding Scale of Production in Fish Culture. Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia.

Regulation of the Minister of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries of the Republic of Indonesia No Per 05/Men/2009. Concerning Scale of Production in Fish Culture by Indonesian Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries.

Robert L, Stephenson, Lane DE. 2011.  Fisheries Management Sciences: a plea for conceptual change.  Canadian Journal of Fisheries and Aquatic Sciences, 1995, 52(9), 2051-2056, https://doi.org/10.1139/f95796.

Related Articles

Reptile diversity in agroecosystem and ecotourism area of Aliwagwag Protected Landscape, Davao Oriental, Philippines

Juliet Tilan Cervantes*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 214-221, June 2026.

Geo-space monitoring technology and gis based predictive modeling of land use/land cover dynamics

E. Ahuchaogu Udo*, U. Duru Uchenna, E. Njoku Richard, G. Ogbonna Chukwuemeka, C. Okoboji Anthony, E. F. Onyeagoro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 202-213, June 2026.

Carbon emissions and removals from land-use and land-cover change in the Djoum, Mintom, Ngoyla, and Yokadouma forest block, Cameroon (Congo Basin)

Pascal Freddy Bikono*, Zachée Ambang, Joseph Armathé Amougou, Lucas Dominique Bembong Ebokona, Garga Amadou, Rose Ngo Makak, Richard Russell Akoulou Ze Mballa, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 170-184, June 2026.

Characterization of macroplastics in the mangrove ecosystems of Baganga, Davao Oriental, Philippines

Marlone M. Barrete*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 150-169, June 2026.

In vitro assessment of Bambara groundnut M3 mutant genotypes for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. in the seedling stage in Burkina Faso

Brahime Tingueri*, Souleymane Ouattara, Adjima Ouoba, Romain W. Soalla, Mahamadi Hamed Ouedraogo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 141-149, June 2026.

Impact of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on biochemical and antioxidant enzymes in Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) infesting oil palm

M. Malarvizhi, N. Santhana Bharathi, K. Sujatha*, A. Vijaya Anand, R. Manikandan, J. P. Antony Prabhu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 129-140, June 2026.

Typhoon risk perception and preparedness after Sendong in Bayug Island

Dinah Millendez*, Lex Rei Brendon Hilario, Jay Rey Alovera, Elizabeth Edan Albiento, Melgie Alas, Peter Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 120-128, June 2026.