The Effect Of Protease Enzyme Supplementation to Productivity Eggs Of Alabio Duck

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2016
Views (869)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The Effect Of Protease Enzyme Supplementation to Productivity Eggs Of Alabio Duck

Danang Biyatmoko, Tintin Rostini
Int. J. Biosci. 8(2), 203-208, February 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Efforts to increase egg production in poultry, including ducks this time a lot is done by manipulating the feed, one of which has been developed and has a good prospect is the supplementation of enzymes including protease enzyme in poultry. The purpose of the study was to determine the effect of enzyme supplementation on the productivity of duck eggs Alabio. The method used in this study using completely randomized design with 4 treatments and 5 replications, where each repetition consisted of five ducks, so the number of ducks research is 100 laying ducks. Factors to be tested is a protease enzyme supplementation in the diet of ducks consists of five factors, these factors are E1 = control ration without enzyme supplementation; E2 = 0.10% enzyme supplementation in the ration; E3 = 0.15% enzyme supplementation in the ration; E4 = 0.30% enzyme supplementation in the ration; and E5 = 0.5% of enzyme supplementation in the ration. Variables measured in the study was the rate of egg production (henday production), egg weight, feed conversion, feed intake. The results showed that the best treatment supplementation of enzymes substantially improve and increase the performance of duck egg production Alabio where supplementation of 0.15% protease enzyme in the ration (E3), because it can improve egg production rate to 83.51% henday production, egg weight with the highest achievements of egg weight 64.36 g.egg-1, and the feed conversion ratio (FCR) at 3.01.

Adrizal A, Yusrizal Y, Fakhri S, Haris W, Ali E, Angel C. 2011. Feeding native laying hens diets containing palm kernel meal with or without enzyme supplementations : 1. Feed conversion ratio and egg production. Journal Applied Poultry Research 20(1), 40 – 49. http://dx.doi.org/10.3382/japr.2010-00196

Adubados MA. 2011. Effect of enzyme supplementation and wheat middlings as an alternative to corn on laying hens performance. Italian Journal of Animal Science 10(37), 254-259.

Aggoor FA, Attia MY, Ismail FS, Qota EM, Shakmak EA. 2006. Effect of level and source of dietary energy and/or enzyme additions on productive performance and egg quality of Japanese quail hens. XII European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy. 2006; 1-7 p.

Alaeldein MA. 2011. Effect of enzyme supplementation and wheat middlings as an alternative to corn on laying hens performance. Italian Journal of Animal Science 10(4), 1 – 6. http://dx.doi.org/10.4081/ijas.2011.e57

Bedford MR. 2000. Exogenous enzymes in monogastric nutrition-their current value and future benefits. Animal Feed Science and Technology, 86(1), 1-13 .

Biyatmoko D. 2014. Effect of Combinations of Light Color and Intensity of Light to Age at First Laying and Production Egg of Alabio Duck. International Journal of Biosciences 5(5), 80 – 85. http://dx.doi.org/10.12692/ijb/5.5.80-85.

Broz J & Ward NE. 2007. The role of vitamins and feed enzymes in combating metabolic challenges and disorders. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 16 (1), 150–159.

Chong CH, Zulkifli I, Blair R. 2008. Effects of dietary inclusion of palm kernel cake and palm uil, and enzyme supplementation on performance of laying hens. Asian-Australian Journal Animal Sciences 21(7), 1053 – 1058.

Costa FGP, Clementino RH, Jácome IMTD, Nascimento GA J,Pereira WE. 2004. Utilização de um complexo multienzimático em dietas de frangos de corte. Ciencia Animal Brasileira 5(2), 63 – 67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.anifeedsci.2005.07.006

Elangovan AV, Deo C,Mandal AB, Singh DP, Shrivastava HP, Johri TS. 2004. Effect of enzyme supplementation on production of brown egg type layers. Indian Journal of Animal Nutrition 21(2), 124 – 126.

Esonul BO, Izukanne RO, Inyang OA. 2005. Evaluation of cellulolytic enzyme supplementation on production indices and nutrient utilization of laying hens fed soybean Hull based diets. International Journal of Poultry Science 4(4), 213 – 216.

Gracia MI, Lázaro R, Latorre MA, Medel P, Araníbar MJ, Jiménez-Moreno E, Mateos GG. 2009. Influence of enzyme supplementation of diets and cooking–flaking of maize on digestive traits and growth performance of broilers from 1 to 21 days of age. Animal Feed Science and Technology 150(3), 303–315.

Janice LM, Anderson DM. 2007. Effect of whole wheat, enzyme supplementation and grain texture on the production performance of laying hens. Canadian Journal of Animal Science 87(4), 579-589. http://dx.doi.org/10.4141/CJAS07051

Javier AVF, Geraldo A, Machado LC, de Brito JA, Bertechini AG, Murakami ESF. 2015. Effect of protease supplementation on production performance of laying hens. Acta Scientiarum Animal Sciences 37(1), 112 – 120. http://dx.doi.org/10.4025/actascianimsci.v37i1.22830

Lichovníková M, Zeman L, Klecker D, Fialová M. 2002. The effect of the long-term administration of dietary lipase on the performance of laying hens. Czech Journal Animal Sciences 47(1), 141–145.

Mathlouthi M, Mohamed MA, Larbier M. 2003. Effect of enzyme preparation containing xylanase and β-glukanase on performance of laying hens fed wheat/barley or maize/soybean meal-based diets. British Poultry Science 44(1), 60 – 66. http://dx.doi.org/10.1080/0007166031000085374

Novak CL, Yakout HM, Remus J. 2008. Response to varying dietary energy and protein with or without enzyme supplementation on leghorn performance and economics. 2. Laying period., The Journal of Applied Poultry Research 17(1), 17-33.

Shih BL, Yu B, Hsu JC. 2005. The development of gastrointestinal tract and pancreatic enzymes in white roman geese. Journal of Animal Sciences 18(6), 841 – 847.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1994. Prinsip dan Prosedur Statistika.  Edisi  2.Terjemahan:  B.  Sumantri.  PT Gramedia Pustaka Utama. Jakarta.

Torki M, Zangiabadi H, Ghasemi HA.2014. Effect of enzyme supplementation on productive performance and egg qualityof laying hens fed diets containing graded levels of whole date waste.  Poultry Science Journal 2(2), 139-151.

Related Articles

Muscle type and meat quality of local chickens according to preslaughter transport conditions and sex in Benin

Assouan Gabriel Bonou*, Finagnon Josée Bernice Houéssionon, Kocou Aimé Edenakpo, Serge Gbênagnon Ahounou, Chakirath Folakè Arikè Salifou, Issaka Abdou Karim Youssao, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 241-250, December 2025.

Effects of micronutrients and timing of application on the agronomic and yield characteristics of cucumber (Cucumis sativus)

Princess Anne C. Lagcao, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 214-240, December 2025.

Response of different soybean varieties to phosphorus fertilizer microdosing and rhizobium inoculation in the sub-humid zone of Northern Benin

Pierre G. Tovihoudji*, Kamarou-Dine Seydou, Lionel Zadji, Sissou Zakari, Valerien A. Zinsou, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 201-213, December 2025.

On-farm validation of black soldier fly larvae meal as a sustainable replacement for shrimp meal in rainbow trout diets in the mid hills of Nepal

Ishori Singh Mahato, Krishna Paudel*, Sunita Chand, Anshuka Bhattarai, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 189-200, December 2025.

Insect fauna associated with Cucumis sativus (Cucurbitales: Cucurbitaceae) in Parakou, A cotton-growing area of central Benin

Lionel Zadji*, Mohamed Yaya, Roland Bocco, Prudencia M. Tovignahoua, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, Hugues Baimey, Leonard Afouda, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 175-188, December 2025.

First record of two hymenopteran species, Brachymeria excarinata Gahan (Chalcididae) and Pteromalus sp. (Pteromalidae), as hyperparasitoids of Diadegma insulare in Senegal

Babacar Labou*, Etienne Tendeng, Mamadou Diatte, El hadji Sérigne Sylla, Karamoko Diarra, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 167-174, December 2025.

Hepatoprotective and antinociceptive effects of terpinolene in streptozotocin-induced diabetic peripheral neuropathic rats

Ravishankar Sarumathi, Muthukumaran Preethi, Chandrasekaran Sankaranarayanan*, Int. J. Biosci. 27(6), 156-166, December 2025.