The effect of water deficit on characteristics phisyological-chemical of sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.) varieties

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2015
Views (656)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The effect of water deficit on characteristics phisyological-chemical of sunflower (Helianthus Annuus L.) varieties

Mahdi Seyed Salehi, Ahmad Afkari Bajehbaj
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(2), 199-207, February 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

For evaluation water deficit stress and potassium rates effects on some morpho-physiological attributes of sunflower, an experiment was conducted in a RCBD based split plot factorial design in three replications in Islamic Azad University, Tabriz Branch research field in 2008. Four sunflower cultivars as Airfloure, Alestar, Armawirski and Ismailli, along with three rates of potassium application as control, 75 and 150 kg/ha were arranged in subplots and three rates of water application after 70, 140 and 210 mm evaporation from Class A pan were arranged in main plots. The results showed that the application of water deficit stress decreased significantly plant height, seed number per head, seed hollowness percent, leaf water potential, leaf area index, leaf relative water content, stomatal resistance and harvest index. In water application after 70 mm evaporation from Class A pan Airfloure and Alestar cultivars had the highest seed number per head and the least hollowness percent, while maximum harvest index was obtained in Airfloure cultivar in consumption of 75 kg/ha potassium sulphate and water application after 210 mm evaporation from Class A pan. Potassium affected leaf water potential and resulted to greater water content as 14.09% and supplied essential hydrostatic pressure to increasing head fresh weight consequently. Increasing irrigation level decreased leaf water potential as 31.71% and increased stomata resistance as 45.61%, consequently leading to 49.17% decrease in head fresh weight. Potassium application enhancement was paralleled with 26.69% increase in grain yield. Also stomatal resistance increased in all cultivars with increasing water application intervals.

Afkari BA. 2009. Industrial Crops Culture. The Publication Azad Islamic University of Kaleybar Branch. Iran. P: 304.

AL-Moshileh AM, MA Errebi. 2004. Effect of various potassium sulfate rates on growth, yield and quality of potato grown under sandy soil and arid conditions. IPI regional workshop on potassium and fertilization development in west Asia and North Africa; Rabat, Morocco, 24-28 November.

Anderson DR, Behboudian MH. 2004. Effects of potassium deficiency on water relations and photosynthesis of the tomato plant. Crop Science, 25(2), 134- 139.

Cakmak I. 2005. The role of potassium in alleviating detrimental effects of abiotic stresses in plants. Journal of Plant Nutrition and Soil Science. 168(4),521-530.

Egilla JN, Davies FT, Malcolm CD. 2001. Effect of potassium on drought resistance of Hibiscus rosa-sinensis cv. Leprechaun: Plant growth, leaf macro-and micronutrient content and root longevity. Plant and Soil 229(2),213-224.

Ewing EE. 1997. Potato. In Wien, H.C. (ed.). The Physiology of Vegetable Crops. CAB International. Oxford, New York, USA, pp. 295-344.

Hopkins WG, Huner PA. 2004. Introduction to Plant Physiology. Wiley & Sons, Inc., New York.

Goksoy AT, Demir O, Turan ZM, Dagustu N. 2004. Responses of sunflower (Helianthus annuus L.) to full and limited irrigation at different growth stages. Field Crops Research. 87, 167-178.

Imas P, Bansal SK. 1999. Potassium and integrated nutrient management in potato. Presented at the Global Conference on Potato, 6-11 December, New Delhi, India.

Khalilvand B, Yarnia M. 2007. The effects of water deficit stress on some of the physiological characters of sunflower in the different density of planting [p]. Journal of Agricultural Sciences, Islamic Azad University, Tabriz branch, 1(2), 37-52.

Khosravifar S, Yarnia M, Khorshidi MB, Hossainzadeh AH. 2008. Effect of potassium drought tolerance in potato cv. Agria. Journal of Food Agriculture and Environment. 6(384), 236-241.

Lafitt R. 2002. Relationship between leaf relative content during reproductive stage and grain formation in rice. Field Crops Research. 76, 165-174.

Lahlou O, Ouattar S, Ledent JF. 2003.The effect of drought and cultivar on growth parameters, yield and yield components of potato. Agronomie. 23(3), 257-268.

Mojayad F, Planchon C. 1998. Stomatal and photosynthetic adjustment to water deficit as the experession of heterosis in sunflower. Crop Sci, 34, 103-107.

Moorby J, Munns R, Walcott J. 1975. Effect of water deficit on photosynthesis and tuber metabolism in potatoes. Aust. J. Plant Physiol. 2, 323-333.

Mansfield TA, Atkinson CJ. 1990. Stomatal behaviour in water stressed plants. Plant Biology 12, 241 -264.

Neiastani A. 2003. The evaluation of drought tolerance in different species of Lentil [p]. Agricultural Journal, 5(1), 61-69.

Perrenoud S. 1993. Fertilizing for High Yield Potato. IPI Bulletin 8. 2nd edn. International Potash Institute, Basel, Switzerland.

Pier PA, Berkowitz GA. 1987. Modulation of water stress effects on photosynthesis by altered leaf K+. Plant Physiol. 85(3), 655-661.

Premachandra GS, Saneoka H, Ogata S. 1991. Cell membrane stability and leaf water relations as affected by potassium nutrition of water-stressed maize. Journal of Experimental Botany 42(239), 739-745.

Taiz L, Zeiger E. 2002. Plant Physiology. Sinaucr, Inc.

Tartar O. 2008. İnfluence of water stress on leaf relative water content of wheat. Asian journal of plant Science. 7(4), 409-412.

Toumeux C, Devaux A, Camacho MR, Mamani P, Ledent JF. 2003. Effect of water shortage on six potato genotypes in the highlands of Bolivia (II): Water relations, physiological parameters. Agronomies 23, 181-190.

Zlatev Z, Stotanov Z. 2005. Effect of water stress on leaf water relation of young bean plants. Journal of Central Eourpan Agriculture. 6(1), 5-14.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.