The impact of nano Fe-chelate, Fe-EDDHA Non-nano and FeSO4 on the growth and physiological index in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) varieties grown in NFT

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2014
Views (484) Download (10)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The impact of nano Fe-chelate, Fe-EDDHA Non-nano and FeSO4 on the growth and physiological index in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) varieties grown in NFT

Musa Jalali, Mehri Zargani
J. Bio. Env. Sci.4( 2), 434-442, February 2014.
Certificate: JBES 2014 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

It is one of the micronutrients Fe, there is enough for plant growth and chlorophyll formation it is necessary. Element for many physiological processes, including the manufacture of chlorophyll and the biochemical reactions of oxidation and reduction, photosynthesis, respiration and enzyme systems is essential. In this regard, this study examines the impact of Nano Fe-chelate, Fe-EDDHA Non-Nano and FeSO4 on some indices of growth and the amount of chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll, Varieties Ovak Leaf Green, Ovak Leaf Violet, Betarige and Ayserg N.F.T grown lettuce in a factorial randomized complete block design with three replications deals. The results suggest that changes in the performance of all averages and indices physiological treatments studied were significant at the one percent level and the number of traits, there were significant differences. So that the maximum mass of the whole plant and shoot fresh mass Ovak Leaf green respectively 253.33 and 216.28 mg, respectively. Fe fertilizers significant effect on chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll “a”. Nano Fe-chelate fertilizer plant than other treatments led to an increase in the amount of chlorophyll “b” and total chlorophyll was. According to the test results to improve the performance of Nano Fe-chelated 9% and Ovak Leaf green varieties grown in NFT system is advisable.

VIEWS 76

Bron JC, Amblers JE, change RL, Foy CD. 2003. The differential response of plant genotype to micronutrients. 389-418. Inj. J. mortvedt et al. (ed) Micronutrients in agricalture soil science society of America incorporation, Medison, Wisconsin.

Cakmack I. 2002; Plant nutrition research: Priorities to meet human needs for food in sustainable ways. Plant and Soil. 247, 3-24.

Jafarnia S, Daey M, Safaiy M. 2007. Hydroponic growing systems. Publishing Training Green farm Mashhad, Iran. 194.

Koksal I, H-DumanoUlu NT Akta M. 1999. The effects of different amino acid chelate foliar fortilisers on yield, fruit quality, shoot growth and Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn concentration of leaves in Williams pear cultivar (Pyrunus communis L.) Tr. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 23, 651-658.

Peyvandi M, Parandeh H, Mirza M. 2010. Comparison of nano Fe-chelate with Fe-chelate on growth parameters and antioxidant enzyme activities basil (Ocimum basilicum). New Journal of Cellular Biotechnology – Molecular, Volume I, Number IV. 11 pages.

Ronaghi A, Chakrol-hosseini M, Karimian N. 2002. Growth and chemical composition of corn as affected by phosphorus and iron. Journal of Science and Technology of Agricultural and Natural Resources 6, 91-102.

Schoen C, De Weerdt M, Hillhorst R, Boender P, Szemes M, Bonats P. 2003. Multiple detection of plant (quarantine) pathogens by micro-arrays: an innovative tool for plant health management. Page 108 in: Abstracts of the 19th International Symposium on virus and virus-like diseases of temperate fruit crops.

Tabatabai  J.  2008.  Mineral  Nutrition  of  Plants. Tabatabai S.J. Tabriz publication. 389.

Taiz L, Zeiger A. 2002. Plant Physiology. Environmental Iranian publishing house (Third Edition), Tehran. 780.

Translation of Naseri A. 2013. Systems hydroponics (growing plants in water, nutrients). Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, the field of water technology. 6.

Vankhadeh S. 2002. Response of sunflower to applied Zn, Fe, P, N. NEs s.zz: 1, 143. 144.