The possibilities for applying vulnerability assessment matrix for biodiversity in protected areas, selected protected area National Park Prokletije in Montenegro

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2015
Views (878)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The possibilities for applying vulnerability assessment matrix for biodiversity in protected areas, selected protected area National Park Prokletije in Montenegro

Marijana Krivokapic
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(6), 105-114, June 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Vulnerability Assessment Matrix for Biodiversity is prepared for further use, as one of basic inputs for more complex analyses of Protected Areas (PA) such as Vulnerability Analyses. Mountain PA National Park (NP) Prokletije in Montenegro is selected as a testing site because of wider application of the Matrix, in different neighbouring mountain PAs (in Kosovo: NP Bjeshket e Nemuna, in Albania: NP Tethi and PA Valbona). Having in mind state of biodiversity data in Montenegro, the matrix is formulated in the way to integrate as wide as possible categories of data on NP biodiversity that also include possibility for graphic modelling for visual interpreting vulnerability assessment. Conditions for creating Vulnerability Assessment Matrix and consequently Vulnerability Analysis for the wider mountain ecoregion of Prokletije are also considered. Typical natural functions of biological but also physical components of Prokletije mountain ecosystem determining its vulnerability.

Bulić Z, Bušković V. (eds). 2007. Studija izvodljivosti za uspostavljanje zaštićenog područja prirode na području Plavskog dijela Prokeltija – Nacionalni park Prokeltije (Crna Gora), Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode & Ministarstvo turizma i zaštite životne sredine, Podgorica. pgs: 279-281, 306, 310-316, 325-330 (Feasibility Study for NP Prokletije).

CLC. 2000 / 2006. Corine Land Cover series for years 2000 and 2006. Real Estate Directorate of Montenegro Podgorica.

Kershner J. (ed). 2014. A Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for Focal Resources of the Sierra Nevada. Version 1.0 EcoAdapt. Bainbridge Island WA, 410 p.

National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2010 – 2015 (NBSAP). 2010. Ministry of Spatial Planning and Environment, Podgorica. pgs 21-22.

Petrović D. (eds). 2012. Katalog tipova staništa Crne Gore značajnih za Evropsku Uniju. Catalogue of habitat types of EU important of Montenegro. Podgorica – Beograd – Zagreb, 2012, 116 p.

Pulević V. 1983. Zaštićene biljne vrste u SR Crnoj Gori. Glasnik Rep. zav. zast. prir i prir. muz. Titograd, 1983. No 16, 33 – 54. (Protected Plant species in SR Montenegro).

Real Estate Directorate of Montenegro. 2010. Geospatial Database, mapping in the scale 1:25.000. Real Estate Directorate of Montenegro. Podgorica.

The Conservation Measure Partnership (CMP). 2013. Open Standards for The Practice of Conservation, Version 3.0.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 1973. International Classification and Mapping of Vegetation, Series 6, Ecology and Conservation. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. 93 p.

USAID. 2001. Biodiversity Maps of Montenegro. Thematic maps 5, 6 & 7: Rare, Endangered and Protected Plant Species. USAID Podgorica.

Zavod za zaštitu prirode. 1995. Pregledna karta osnovnih šumskih zajednica u razmjeri 1: 350.000, Zavod za zaštitu prirode Podgorica (Map of Forest associations in Montenegro).

Related Articles

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.

Carbon sequestration potential of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement

Alliah B. Balaba*, Niña Mae R. Villar, Ana Celina T. Soriano, Myrna G. Pabiona, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 50-55, June 2026.

Effects of environmental stressors on morphological traits of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and microbial diversity of soil treated with cadmium and lead

Fortune Onyeuka Otumunye*, Tobore Roseline Agbosa, Boniface Edegbai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 42-49, June 2026.

SWAT+-based water balance assessment of Ipil watershed in Bohol, Philippines: Spatial and temporal patterns of water availability

Anselmo M. Aurestila*, Proceso M. Castil, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 30-41, June 2026.