The possibilities for applying vulnerability assessment matrix for biodiversity in protected areas, selected protected area National Park Prokletije in Montenegro

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2015
Views (681)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The possibilities for applying vulnerability assessment matrix for biodiversity in protected areas, selected protected area National Park Prokletije in Montenegro

Marijana Krivokapic
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(6), 105-114, June 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Vulnerability Assessment Matrix for Biodiversity is prepared for further use, as one of basic inputs for more complex analyses of Protected Areas (PA) such as Vulnerability Analyses. Mountain PA National Park (NP) Prokletije in Montenegro is selected as a testing site because of wider application of the Matrix, in different neighbouring mountain PAs (in Kosovo: NP Bjeshket e Nemuna, in Albania: NP Tethi and PA Valbona). Having in mind state of biodiversity data in Montenegro, the matrix is formulated in the way to integrate as wide as possible categories of data on NP biodiversity that also include possibility for graphic modelling for visual interpreting vulnerability assessment. Conditions for creating Vulnerability Assessment Matrix and consequently Vulnerability Analysis for the wider mountain ecoregion of Prokletije are also considered. Typical natural functions of biological but also physical components of Prokletije mountain ecosystem determining its vulnerability.

Bulić Z, Bušković V. (eds). 2007. Studija izvodljivosti za uspostavljanje zaštićenog područja prirode na području Plavskog dijela Prokeltija – Nacionalni park Prokeltije (Crna Gora), Republički zavod za zaštitu prirode & Ministarstvo turizma i zaštite životne sredine, Podgorica. pgs: 279-281, 306, 310-316, 325-330 (Feasibility Study for NP Prokletije).

CLC. 2000 / 2006. Corine Land Cover series for years 2000 and 2006. Real Estate Directorate of Montenegro Podgorica.

Kershner J. (ed). 2014. A Climate Change Vulnerability Assessment for Focal Resources of the Sierra Nevada. Version 1.0 EcoAdapt. Bainbridge Island WA, 410 p.

National Biodiversity Strategy and Action Plan 2010 – 2015 (NBSAP). 2010. Ministry of Spatial Planning and Environment, Podgorica. pgs 21-22.

Petrović D. (eds). 2012. Katalog tipova staništa Crne Gore značajnih za Evropsku Uniju. Catalogue of habitat types of EU important of Montenegro. Podgorica – Beograd – Zagreb, 2012, 116 p.

Pulević V. 1983. Zaštićene biljne vrste u SR Crnoj Gori. Glasnik Rep. zav. zast. prir i prir. muz. Titograd, 1983. No 16, 33 – 54. (Protected Plant species in SR Montenegro).

Real Estate Directorate of Montenegro. 2010. Geospatial Database, mapping in the scale 1:25.000. Real Estate Directorate of Montenegro. Podgorica.

The Conservation Measure Partnership (CMP). 2013. Open Standards for The Practice of Conservation, Version 3.0.

United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO). 1973. International Classification and Mapping of Vegetation, Series 6, Ecology and Conservation. Paris, France: United Nations Educational, Scientific, and Cultural Organization. 93 p.

USAID. 2001. Biodiversity Maps of Montenegro. Thematic maps 5, 6 & 7: Rare, Endangered and Protected Plant Species. USAID Podgorica.

Zavod za zaštitu prirode. 1995. Pregledna karta osnovnih šumskih zajednica u razmjeri 1: 350.000, Zavod za zaštitu prirode Podgorica (Map of Forest associations in Montenegro).

Related Articles

Cytogenetic and pathological investigations in maize × teosinte hybrids: Chromosome behaviour, spore identification, and inheritance of maydis leaf blight resistance

Krishan Pal, Ravi Kishan Soni, Devraj, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Avtar, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 70-76, August 2025.

Conservation and trade dynamics of non-timber forest products in local markets in south western Cameroon

Kato Samuel Namuene, Mojoko Fiona Mbella, Godswill Ntsomboh-Ntsefong, Eunice Waki, Hudjicarel Kiekeh, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 58-69, August 2025.

Overemphasis on blue carbon leads to biodiversity loss: A case study on subsidence coastal wetlands in southwest Taiwan

Yih-Tsong Ueng, Feng-Jiau Lin, Ya-Wen Hsiao, Perng-Sheng Chen, Hsiao-Yun Chang, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 46-57, August 2025.

An assessment of the current scenario of biodiversity in Ghana in the context of climate change

Patrick Aaniamenga Bowan, Francis Tuuli Gamuo Junior, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 35-45, August 2025.

Entomofaunal diversity in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] cultivation systems within the cotton-growing zone of central Benin

Lionel Zadji, Roland Bocco, Mohamed Yaya, Abdou-Abou-Bakari Lassissi, Raphael Okounou Toko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 21-34, August 2025.

Biogenic fabrication of biochar-functionalized iron oxide nanoparticles using Miscanthus sinensis for oxytetracycline removal and toxicological assessment

Meenakshi Sundaram Sharmila, Gurusamy, Annadurai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 10-20, August 2025.

Bacteriological analysis of selected fishes sold in wet markets in Tuguegarao city, Cagayan, Philippines

Lara Melissa G. Luis, Jay Andrea Vea D. Israel, Dorina D. Sabatin, Gina M. Zamora, Julius T. Capili, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 1-9, August 2025.

Effect of different substrates on the domestication of Saba comorensis (Bojer) Pichon (Apocynaceae), a spontaneous plant used in agroforestry system

Claude Bernard Aké*1, Bi Irié Honoré Ta2, Adjo Annie Yvette Assalé1, Yao Sadaiou Sabas Barima1, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(1), 90-96, July 2025.