The soil carbon sequestration capacity with different land uses (case study: the award watershed in Mazandaran Province)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2015
Views (550)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The soil carbon sequestration capacity with different land uses (case study: the award watershed in Mazandaran Province)

Zahara Jafari, Samira Mesri, F. Aslani
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(5), 116-121, May 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

One approach for reducing CO2 and increasing global carbon storage is the sequestration of it in soils. Therefore, this study aims to evaluate carbon sequestration with different land uses and its economic aspect in the Award watershed in the Mazandaran province. First of all, in the study area, the boundary of the watershed was delineated and controlled by a field survey using GPS. After the boundary of the study area was demarcated, the soil samples were selected randomly, taken from a depth of 0-30 cm for each land use (i.e., protected forest, open forest, rangelands, walnut gardens, mixed walnut–apple gardens, cereal croplands and frijol farmland). In total, around 21 soil samples were taken from the study area. The selected parameters for analysis are the amount of carbon sequestration and certain soil properties (bulk density and organic carbon). The statistical analysis was performed by the SPSS.16.0 software. After the assessment of the homogeneity of variance, in order to test the null hypothesis of the equal averages of the parameters for the seven land uses, analysis of variance (ANOVA) was performed by the Duncan test at a significance level of 5%. The results demonstrate that the different land uses have different effects on the amount of carbon sequestration. The protected forests and cereal croplands have the highest and lowest carbon sequestration values, respectively. The overall amount of carbon sequestration in this watershed has been estimated to be around 743,460 ton/ha.

Aguilar R, Kelly EF, Heil RD. 1988. Effect of cultivation on soil in northern Great Plains rangeland. J. Soil Sci. Society. Of America 52, 1081-1085.

Black GR, Hartge KH. 1986. Bulk Density. In: Klute, A. (Ed.), Methods of Soil Analysis, Part 1, Physical and Mineralogical Methods, 2nd ed., Agronomy 9, 363-382.

Bordbar K, Mortazavi Jahromi SM. 2006. Evaluation of carbon storage potential in forestations of Eucalyptus and Acacia in western region of Fars province. Journal of Research and Development of Natural Resources. Number 70, 103-95.

Derner JD, Beriske DD, Bouttonm TW. 1997. Does Grazing Mediate Soil Carbon and Nitrogen Accumulation beneath C4, Perennial Grasses along an Environmental gradient? Plant and Soil 191, 147-156.

Farquharson RJ, Schwenke GD, Mullen JD. 2003. Should we manage soil organic carbon in Vertisols in the northern grains region of Australia? Aust. J. Exp. Agriculture 43, 261-270.

IPCC. 2001. Climate Change. The Scientific Basis. IPCC third assessment report, Working group I, Technical Summary, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK. 881 pp.

Lal R. 1999. Soil quality and food security: the global perspective. In: Lal, R. (Ed.), Soil Quality and Soil Erosion. Soil and Water Conservation Society and CRC Press, Boca Raton.

Lal R. 1997. Degradation and resilience of soils. Philosophical Transaction of the Royal Society Lonon, Biological Science. B 352, 997-1010.

Luciuk GM, Boonneau MA, Boyle DM, Vibery E. 2000. Prairie rehabilitation, administration paper, Carbon sequestration additional environmental, benefits of forests in the Prairie Farm Rehabilitation Administration (PFRA). ID No 1967. Session 22, 191-194.

Mahmodi Taleghani E, Zahedi Amiri G, Adeli E, Sagheb Talebi Kh. 2007. Assessment of carbon sequestration in soil layers of protected forest. Iranian Journal of Forest and Spruce Research 15 (3), 241-252.

Mortenson M, Shuman GE. 2002. Carbon sequestration in rangeland inter-seeded with yellow-flowering Alfalfa (Medicago sativa spp. Falcata), USDA symposium on natural resource management to offset greenhouse gas emission in University of Wyoming.

Nelson RE. 1982. Carbonate and Gypsum. In: Methods of Soil Analysis. Part II. Page, A. L. (Ed.). American Society of Agronomy, Madison, Wisconsin, USA. Agriculture. Natural Resource 12(44), 123-134.

Ojima D, Stephen D, Parton WJ. Mosier A, Morgan J, Conant R, Paustian K. 2000. Carbon storage in land under cropland and rangeland management, Advances in terrestrial ecosystem carbon inventory, measurements, and monitoring. Conference in Raleigh North Carolina, October 3-5,.

Pimental D. 1997. Soil erosion and agricultural productivity: The global population, food problem. Ecological perspective in science, humanities and economics GAIA 6 (3), 197-204.

Reeves DW. 1997. The soil organic matter in maintaining soil quality in continuous cropping systems, Soil and Tillage Research 43, 131- 167.

Schuman GE, Janzen H, Herick JE. 2002. Soil carbon information and potential carbon sequestra-tion by Rangelands. Environmental Pollution 116, 391-396.

Related Articles

Agroforestry in woody-encroached Sub-Saharan savannas: Transforming ecological challenges into sustainable opportunities

Yao Anicet Gervais Kouamé, Pabo Quévin Oula, Kouamé Fulgence Koffi, Ollo Sib, Adama Bakayoko, Karidia Traoré, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 10-22, September 2025.

Extreme rainfall variability and trends in the district of Ouedeme, municipality of Glazoue (Benin)

Koumassi Dègla Hervé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 1-9, September 2025.

Heterosis breeding, general and specific combining ability and stability studies in pearl millet: Current trends

Ram Avtar, Krishan Pal, Kavita Rani, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 117-124, August 2025.

Combining ability, heterosis and stability for yield and fibre quality traits in cotton: Breeding approaches and future prospects

Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Krishan Pal, R. P. Saharan, Ram Avtar, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 109-116, August 2025.

Bridging the COPD awareness gap in marginalized populations: Findings from a multicentre study in Khalilabad, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India

Anupam Pati Tripathi, Jigyasa Pandey, Sakshi Singh, Smita Pathak, Dinesh Chaudhary, Alfiya Mashii, Farheen Fatima, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 97-108, August 2025.

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of Pleurotus citrinopileatus Singer and Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer

P. Maheswari, P. Madhanraj, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 90-96, August 2025.

Mangrove abundance, diversity, and productivity in effluent-rich estuarine portion of Butuanon River, Mandaue City, Cebu

John Michael B. Genterolizo, Miguelito A. Ruelan, Laarlyn N. Abalos, Kathleen Kay M. Buendia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 77-89, August 2025.

Cytogenetic and pathological investigations in maize × teosinte hybrids: Chromosome behaviour, spore identification, and inheritance of maydis leaf blight resistance

Krishan Pal, Ravi Kishan Soni, Devraj, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Avtar, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 70-76, August 2025.