Ultrastructural and physiological aspects of eucalyptus clones submitted to barium

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/01/2018
Views (344) Download (20)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Ultrastructural and physiological aspects of eucalyptus clones submitted to barium

Lucas Aparecido Manzani Lisboa, Caio Marçal Gomes David, Wagner José Machado da Silva, Flávia Aparecida Santos Matias Machado da Silva, Brenda Geraldi Araujo, Marcos da Silva Ataide, Hiago Augusto Amaral Sacco, Leandro Barradas Pereira, Paulo Alexandre Monteiro de Figueiredo
Int. J. Agron. Agri. Res.12( 1), 53-61, January 2018.
Certificate: IJAAR 2018 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

This work aimed evaluate ultrastructural and physiological aspects of 35-days old eucalyptus, clones 13; 59 and 131, by submitting them to the following barium doses: null, 125; 250; 500 and 1000 ppm of barium solution, with four repetitions. Due to the exposition to barium, there was appearance of phytotoxicity on the leaves. Then, it was determined the following variables: Phloem of Diameter of Leaf and Root (PDL and PDR); Xylem of Diameter of Leaf and Root (XDL and XDR) and Thickness of Palisade Parenchyma (PP); Spad Index (SPADI); Inferior Face of Stomata Functionality of the Inferior Face (IFSF) and Stomach Density of the Inferior Face (SD). Barium negatively influenced the leaf ultrastructure of eucalyptus and its physiology. Eucalyptus clones 13; 59 and 131 are susceptible to barium solution. Barium caused root and ultraestructutal leaves and root damages on eucalyptus clones. Xylem diameter of leaves of eucalyptus clones 13 and 59 were not harmed as exposed to Barium.

VIEWS 14

Ali B, Qian P, Jin R, Ali S, Khan M, Aziz R, Tian T, Zhou W. 2014. Physiological and ultra-structural changes in Brassica napus seedlings induced by cadmium stress. Biologia Plantarum 58(1), 131-138. http://dx.doi.org/10.1007/s10535-013-0358-5

Banzatto DA, Kronka SN. 2013. Experimentação Agrícola. 4.Ed. Funep 237p.

Bertoli AC, Carvalho R, Cannata MG, Bastos ARR, Augusto AS. 2011. Toxidez do chumbo no teor e translocação de nutrientes em tomateiro. Biotemas, 24(4), 7-15. http://dx.doi.org/10.5007/2175-7925.2011

Blamey P, Hernandez-Soriano M, Cheng M, Tang C, Paterson D, Lombi E, Wang WH, Scheckel K, Kopittke PM. 2015. Synchrotron-based techniques shed light on mechanisms of plant sensitivity and tolerance to high manganese in the root environment. Plant Physiology 169, 2006-2020. https://doi.org/10.1104/pp.15.00726

Brahim S, Niess A, Pflipsen M, Neuhoff D, Scherer H. 2017. Effect of combined fertilization with rock phosphate and elemental sulphur on yield and nutrient uptake of soybean. Plant Soil Environ, 63(2), 89-95. http://dx.doi.org/10.17221/22/2017-PSE

Buckeridge MS, Tiné MAS, Santos HP, Lima DU. 2000. Polissacarídeos de reserva de parede celular em sementes. Estrutura, metabolismo, funções e aspectos ecológicos. Revista Brasileira de Fisiologia Vegetal 12, 137-162.

Donato AM, Morretes BL. 2009. Anatomia foliar de Eugenia florida DC. (Myrtaceae). Revista Brasileira de Farmacognosia 19(3), 759-770. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590

Figueiredo FAMMA, Carneiro, JGA, Penchel RM, Barroso DG, Daher RF. 2011. Efeito das variações biométricas de mudas clonais de eucalipto sobre o crescimento no campo. Revista Árvore 35(1), 1-11. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-676220110001

Figueiredo PAM, Ramos SB, Viana RS, Lisboa LAM, Heinrichs R. 2013. Alterações morfoanatômicas foliares da cana-de-açúcar na fase de estabelecimento em condições de matocompetição. Planta Daninha 31(4), 777-784. http://dx.doi. org/10.1590/S0100-835820130004

Hoagland D R, Arnon DI. 1950. The Water-Culture Method for Growing Plants Without Soil. California Agricultural Experiment Station Circular 347. College of Agriculture, University of California Berkeley.

Kraus, JE, Arduim M. 1997. Manual básico de métodos em morfologia vegetal. Seropédica:EDUR 221p.

Macedo FG, Melo WJ, Merlino LCS, Donha RMA, Melo GMP, Lavres Junior L. 2014. Dynamics of zinc (Zn) and nickel (Ni) in a Cerrado Oxisol treated with sewage sludge for a long period. Australian Journal of Crop Science 8(11), 1487-1494.

Merlino LCS, Melo WJ, Macedo FG, Guedes ACTP, Ribeiro MH, Melo VP, Melo GMP. Bário, cádmio, cromo e chumbo em plantas de milho e em latossolo após onze aplicações anuais de lodo de esgoto. Revista Brasileira de Ciência do Solo 34, 2031-2039. http://dx.doi.org/10.1590/S0100-0683 2010000600027

Moraes CL, Marini P, Fernando JA, Moraes DM, Castro LAS, Lopes NF. 2014. Alterações fisiológicas e ultraestruturais de plântulas de tomate induzidas por chumbo. Iheringia Serie Botânica 69(2), 313-322.

Pookothai M, Vijayavathi BS. 2012. Nickel as an essential element and a toxicant. International Journal of Environmental Sciences 1(4), 285-288.

Raven PH, Eichhorn SE, Evert RF. 2014. Biologia Vegetal. 8.Ed. Guanabara Koogan 850p.

Reis AR, Barcelos JPQ, Osório CRWS, Santos EF, Lisboa LAM, Santini JMK, Santos MJD, Furlani Junior E, Campos M, Figueiredo PAM, Lavres J, Gratão PL. 2017. A glimpse into the physiological, biochemical and nutritional status of soybean plants under Ni-stress conditions. Environmental and Experimental Botany 144, 76-87. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.envexpbot.2017.10.006

Salazar MJ, Rodriguez JH, Nieto GL, Pignata ML. 2012. Effects of heavy metal concentrations (Cd, Zn and Pb) in agricultural soils near different emission sources on quality, accumulation and food safety in soybean [Glycine max (L.) Merrill]. Journal of Hazardous Materials 233(234), 244-253. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.jhazmat.2012.07.026

Santos EF, Santini JMK, Paixão AP, Furlani Júnior E, Lavres J, Campos M, Reis AR. 2017. Physiological highlights of manganese toxicity symptoms in soybean plants: Mn toxicity responses. Plant Physiology and Biochemistry 113, 6-19. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.plaphy.2017.01.022

Sharwood RE, Crous KY, Whitney SM, Ellsworth DD, Ghannoum O. 2016. Linking photosynthesis and leaf N allocation under future elevated CO2 and climate warming in Eucalyptus globulus. Journal of Experimental Botany 1-11. https://doi.org/10.1093/jxb/erw484

Silva FAS, Azevedo CAV. 2016. The Assistant Software Version 7.7 and its use in the analysis of experimental data. African Journal Agriculture Resarch 11(39), 3733-3740. http://dx.doi.org/ 10.5897/AJAR2016.11522

Taiz L, Zeiger E. 2017. Fisiologia vegetal. 6. ed. Porto characteristic of crop habit. BMC Plant Biology 16(214), 1-18. http://dx.doi.org/10.1186/s12870-016-0902-5Alegre: Artmed 858p.

Thomas CL, Alcock TD, Graham NS, Hayden R, Matterson S, Wilson L, Young SD, Dupuy LX, White PJ, Hammond JP, Danku JMC, Salt DE, Sweeney A, Bancroft, I. Broadley MR. 2016. Root morphology and seed and leaf ionomic traits in a Brassica napus L. diversity panel show wide phenotypic variation and are