Variation in growth rate and production of hydroponically grown tomatoes at various location of indigenous shed house

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2019
Views (1083)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Variation in growth rate and production of hydroponically grown tomatoes at various location of indigenous shed house

Zia-Ul-Haq, M. Sufyan Ansar, Arslan Nasir, Aamir Iqbal, Sohail Raza Haidree, Talha Mehmood, M. Kazim Nawaz
Int. J. Biosci. 15(3), 524-527, September 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Tomato is a prominent hydroponically grown crop in the world. For offseason tomatoes production, environment controlled greenhouses are usually constructed. However, production difference was observed at various location/site in the indigenously developed shed due variation in sunlight availability, temperature and humidity regulation. Research was conducted at experimental site of Institute of Hydroponic Agriculture, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi with an objective; to assess the yield difference at various location in indigenously developed shed house constructed for hydroponic vegetable production. Greenhouse are usually made of temper glass while in indigenous model polythene sheet was used as covering material. Four sites in the shed house were selected; T1 (sunny side), T2 (shady side), T3 (exhaust fan side) and T4 (cooling pad side). Influence of environmental difference on the plant height, number of cluster and total production was observed during experiment. The recorded data was statistically analyzed by selecting Complete Randomized Design (CRD). It was concluded that highest yield was recorded at the area having more sun light hours.

Black B, Drost D, Rowley D, Helflebower R. 2008. Constructing a low cost high tunnel. Cooperative Extension. Utah State University p. 8.

Dickerson GW. 2011. Extension Horticulture Specialist. College of Agriculture, Consumer and Environmental Sciences New Mexico State University 93(2), 521-527.

Gellani U. 2011. Getting your money’s worth. Pakistan Today. Data online available on: https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2011/06/17/getting-your-moneys-worth/

Hachmann TL, Echer MM, Dalastra GM, Vasconcelos ES, Guimarães VF. 2014. Cultivo do tomateiro sob diferentes espaçamentos entre plantas e diferentes níveis de desfolha das folhas basais. Bragantia, Campinas 73(4), 399-406.

Heyden L. 2009. Hydroponic in commercial food production. Buzzle web portal: Intelligent life on the web. http://www.buzzle.com/articles/hydroponics-in-commercial-food-production.html

Krishna G. 2008. Tunnel plastic sheet. Shalimar plastic industry. Online available: www.google.com. pk/tunnel plastic industry

Logendra LS, Gianfagna TJ, Specca DR, Janes HW. 2001. Greenhouse tomato limited cluster production systems: Crop management practices affect yield. Hort Science 36(5), 893-896.

Nasir MU, Hussain S, Jabbar S. 2015. Tomato processing, lycopene and health benefits: A review. Science Letters 3(1), 1-5.

Oliveira VR, Campos JP, Fontes PCR, Reis FP. 1995. Efeito do número de hastes por planta e poda apical na produção classificada de frutos de tomateiro (Lycopersicon esculentum MILL.). Ciência e Prática Lavras 19, 414-419.

Papadopoulos AP, HÃO X. 1997. Effects of three greenhouse cover materials on tomato growth, productivity, and energy use. Scientia Horticulturae 70(3), 165-178.

Perveen R. 2015. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) carotenoids and lycopenes chemistry: metabolism, absorption, nutrition, and allied health claims: A comprehensive review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 55(7), 919-929.

Purquerio LFV, Tivelli SW. 2006. Manejo do ambiente em cultivo protegido. São Paulo: Codeagro p.11.

Treftz C, Omaye ST. 2015. Nutrient analysis of soil and soilless strawberries and raspberries grown in a greenhouse. Food and Nutrition Sciences 6, 805-815.

Related Articles

Stabilization of cashew apple juice with chitosan: clarification and microbiological quality

Kokora Aya Philomène*, Coulibaly Adama, Cissé Mohamed, Coulibaly Bintou, Konan N’guessan Ysidor, Godi Henri Marius Biego, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 76-88, August 2026.

Implementation and evaluation of limited face to face classes: basis for adoption of health and safety manual

Christian Jude B. Calunsag*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 65-75, August 2026.

Baseline characterization of farming systems in the province of Bassitenga in Burkina Faso

Boly Ismaël Ardho*, Traoré Mamadou, Hema Alain Sabiriba, Sory Lallé Daouda, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 54-64, August 2026.

Zootechnical performance and economic profitability of sasso broiler chickens reared under a semi-automatic production system in Burkina Faso

Bernadette Yougbaré*, Arnaud Stéphane Rayangnéwêndé Tapsoba, Fatogoman Téophile Sanou, Clément Kaboré, Amadou Traoré, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 35-44, August 2026.

Factors influencing the use of Mucuna pruriens as food in Benin, West Africa

Yves Boladé Djimba, Janvier Mêlégnonfan Kindossi*, Folachodé Ulrich Gildas Akogou, Ephraïm Olouwafemi Biao, Jacques Agangni, Kokou Mensah Adjangba, Ogouyôm Herbert Iko Afé, Franck Hongbété, Rodrigue V. Cao Diogo, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 19-34, August 2026.

Contribution to the inventorier and establishment of a collection of agricultural entomofauna from the Niayes area of Dakar

Mamecor Faye*, Amy Collé Guèye, Coumba Gning, Lamine Konaté, Mbacké Sembène, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 10-18, August 2026.

Assessment of the trophic ecology and variation in the natural diet of an anuran amphibian species (Afrixalus dorsalis) in the Wetlands of the Ehotilé Islands (Ivory Coast)

Beh Romaric Konate*, Amani Reine Élisabeth Kouadio, Louis César Agou, Enoutchy Fabrice Bouah, N'Guessan Ludovic Yao, Etilé Raphaël N’doua, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 1-9, August 2026.