Variation in growth rate and production of hydroponically grown tomatoes at various location of indigenous shed house

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2019
Views (850)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Variation in growth rate and production of hydroponically grown tomatoes at various location of indigenous shed house

Zia-Ul-Haq, M. Sufyan Ansar, Arslan Nasir, Aamir Iqbal, Sohail Raza Haidree, Talha Mehmood, M. Kazim Nawaz
Int. J. Biosci. 15(3), 524-527, September 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Tomato is a prominent hydroponically grown crop in the world. For offseason tomatoes production, environment controlled greenhouses are usually constructed. However, production difference was observed at various location/site in the indigenously developed shed due variation in sunlight availability, temperature and humidity regulation. Research was conducted at experimental site of Institute of Hydroponic Agriculture, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University, Rawalpindi with an objective; to assess the yield difference at various location in indigenously developed shed house constructed for hydroponic vegetable production. Greenhouse are usually made of temper glass while in indigenous model polythene sheet was used as covering material. Four sites in the shed house were selected; T1 (sunny side), T2 (shady side), T3 (exhaust fan side) and T4 (cooling pad side). Influence of environmental difference on the plant height, number of cluster and total production was observed during experiment. The recorded data was statistically analyzed by selecting Complete Randomized Design (CRD). It was concluded that highest yield was recorded at the area having more sun light hours.

Black B, Drost D, Rowley D, Helflebower R. 2008. Constructing a low cost high tunnel. Cooperative Extension. Utah State University p. 8.

Dickerson GW. 2011. Extension Horticulture Specialist. College of Agriculture, Consumer and Environmental Sciences New Mexico State University 93(2), 521-527.

Gellani U. 2011. Getting your money’s worth. Pakistan Today. Data online available on: https://www.pakistantoday.com.pk/2011/06/17/getting-your-moneys-worth/

Hachmann TL, Echer MM, Dalastra GM, Vasconcelos ES, Guimarães VF. 2014. Cultivo do tomateiro sob diferentes espaçamentos entre plantas e diferentes níveis de desfolha das folhas basais. Bragantia, Campinas 73(4), 399-406.

Heyden L. 2009. Hydroponic in commercial food production. Buzzle web portal: Intelligent life on the web. http://www.buzzle.com/articles/hydroponics-in-commercial-food-production.html

Krishna G. 2008. Tunnel plastic sheet. Shalimar plastic industry. Online available: www.google.com. pk/tunnel plastic industry

Logendra LS, Gianfagna TJ, Specca DR, Janes HW. 2001. Greenhouse tomato limited cluster production systems: Crop management practices affect yield. Hort Science 36(5), 893-896.

Nasir MU, Hussain S, Jabbar S. 2015. Tomato processing, lycopene and health benefits: A review. Science Letters 3(1), 1-5.

Oliveira VR, Campos JP, Fontes PCR, Reis FP. 1995. Efeito do número de hastes por planta e poda apical na produção classificada de frutos de tomateiro (Lycopersicon esculentum MILL.). Ciência e Prática Lavras 19, 414-419.

Papadopoulos AP, HÃO X. 1997. Effects of three greenhouse cover materials on tomato growth, productivity, and energy use. Scientia Horticulturae 70(3), 165-178.

Perveen R. 2015. Tomato (Solanum lycopersicum) carotenoids and lycopenes chemistry: metabolism, absorption, nutrition, and allied health claims: A comprehensive review. Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition 55(7), 919-929.

Purquerio LFV, Tivelli SW. 2006. Manejo do ambiente em cultivo protegido. São Paulo: Codeagro p.11.

Treftz C, Omaye ST. 2015. Nutrient analysis of soil and soilless strawberries and raspberries grown in a greenhouse. Food and Nutrition Sciences 6, 805-815.

Related Articles

Comparative assessment of mixed and intercropping of lentil (Lens culinaris) and sunflower (Helianthus annuus)

Md. Shamim Ahmed*, Mohammad Tojammel Haq, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 151-158, February 2026.

Extraction of biologically active substances of fungi isolated from various ecosystems and evaluation of their effect

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, G. A. Tomuyeva, A. R. Hasanova, V. Y. Hasanova, A. M. Hasanov, S. E. Nagiyeva, A. G. Eyvazov, G. T. Huseynova, G. A. Qasimova, V. K. Isayeva, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 143-150, February 2026.

Integrative role of yeast culture metabolites in aquatic health and productivity

Sajjad Ur Rahman, Dur E Nayab, Rabia Kanwar*, Muhammad Mukarram Bashir, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 126-142, February 2026.

Land use efficiency and performance of sweet corn-cowpea intercropping influenced by temporal planting and methods of fertilizer application

Bryan Cristian M. Demolar, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 101-125, February 2026.

Illuminating the deficiency: Public awareness of vitamin- D in Lahore, Pakistan

Muhammad Zeeshan Arif*, Muhammad Arslan Shahid, Zeerak Laila, Ahmad Ali Shabbir, Farrukh Nadeem, M Muazzam Khan, Yousuf Shahjahan, Rajab Ali, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 91-100, February 2026.

Characteristics of symbiotic relationships between plants and bacteria and the influence of stress factors on them

Konul F. Bakhshaliyeva, Navai D. İmamquliyev, Mehpara İ. Gasımova, Sevda M. Muradova, Panah Z. Muradov*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 75-90, February 2026.

In the line of fire: Unmasking the institutional challenges in the bureau of fire protection

Mhelen Grace F. Libre, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 53-74, February 2026.

One health approch: Diversity of domestic larval habitats and human responsibility in mosquito proliferation in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

Zouéra Laouali, Kouamé Wilfred Ulrich Kouadio, Moussa Namountougou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 38-52, February 2026.