Water productivity and sensitivity tolerance stress indices in five soybean cultivars (Glycine max L.) at different levels of water deficit

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2015
Views (237) Download (9)

Water productivity and sensitivity tolerance stress indices in five soybean cultivars (Glycine max L.) at different levels of water deficit

Jafar Azizi, Hassan Masoumi, Rashed Alavi, Mahmoud Reza Khorshidian
J. Bio. Env. Sci.6( 6), 144-155, June 2015.
Certificate: JBES 2015 [Generate Certificate]


In order to measure the water deficit stress effects on seed yield and water productivity of soybean cultivars, a two field experiments wad conducted out via split plot in a randomized complete block design with four replications in 2010-2011 and 2011-2012. Irrigation treatments were three levels (S1; 50, S2; 62.5 and S3; 150 mm) that applied based on evaporation from the ‘class A’ pan. Cultivars were L17, Clean, T.M.S, Williams x Chippewa and M9, too. The results showed that, only extreme water deficit stresses (S3) was reduced number of pods per plants, dry weight, seed yield and also water productivity and water economic productivity, significantly. Among cultivars and at the first and second levels of irrigation (S1, S2) cultivar of L17 and at the third level (S3) cultivar of Wiiliams x Chippwea had the highest seed yield, water productivity and water economic productivity. There were observed a positive and significant correlation between seed yield with number of pods per plants and plants dry weight, too. Also, despite the reduction in water consumption at level of S2 than S1 and due to the lack of a significant reduction in seed yield, water productivity and water economic productivity was also increased, significantly (P<0.01). All indices of sensitivity and tolerance (SSI, STI and GMP) investigated in this study showed that at the moderate and extreme water deficit stresses (S2, S3), the cultivars of L17 and Wiiliams x Chippwea had the highest tolerance and lowest sensitivity among the cultivars.


Abdullaev I, Molden D, Bakhtyar P, Matyakubov K. 2012. Best water conservation practices and their impact on water productivity in the Syr Darya river basin. Draft IWMI Research Report 37 pp.

Ali M, Talukder MS. 2012. Increasing water productivity in crop production. Agriculture Water Management (95), 1201–13.

Arwoth N, Supachi K, Petterlik K, Anek C. 2011. Application of drought index in soybean improvement for north east Thailand. Thailand Agriculture Research Journal 5(1), 500-520.

Asadi M, Aghili N. 2007. Water conservation-best practices. Journal of Hydro technical 12(1), 123-128.

Board JE. 2012. A regression model to predict soybean cultivar yield performance soybean cultivar yield performance at late planting dates. Agronomy Journal 94, 483-492.

Bokaei AS, Babaee HR, Habibi D, Javidfar F, Mohammadi F. 2011. Path analysis for grainyield in soybean under different irrigation conditions. Procce-ding of the 10th Iranian Congress of Crop Science. Karaj. Iran.

Chaudhuri N, Kanemasa H. 2007. Effects of water gradient on sorghum growth, water relations and yield. Canadian Journal of Plant Sciences 62, 599-607.

Clark J, Richer M, Condok A. 2013. Effect of drought stress on transpiration of wheat and soybean. Field Crop Research 86, 185-198.

Farahani H, Oweis T. 2008. Agricultural water productivity in Karkheh river basin. In: Improving On-farm Agricultural Productivity in Karkheh River Basin”, A Compendium of Review Papers. CGIAR challenge program on water and food. Research Report No 1.

Farooq M, Vahid A, Kobayashi N, Fujita D, Basra S. 2009. Plant drought stress: effects, mecha-nisms and management. Agronomy and Sustainable Development 29, 185–212.

Fernandez GC. 1992. Effective selection criteria for assessing stress tolerance. Proceedings of the Interna-tional Symposium on “Adaptation of vegetables and other food crops in temperature and water stress. AVRDC Publication. Tainan. Taiwan.

Fisher RA, Maurer R. 1987. Drought resistance in spring wheat cultivars. Australian Journal of Agricul-tural Research 29, 197-210.

Gao WR, Wang XHS, Liu P, Chen CH. 2009. Comparative analysis of ESTs in response to drought stress in chickpea (Cicer arietinum L.). Biochemical and Biophysical Research 376, 578-583.

Gharib Eeshghi A, Razmi R, Adelzadehm F. 2012. Study of the efficiency of some drought tolerance indices in selection of soybean lines and cultivars under moisture deficit conditions in Caspian region using principal component analysis. Procce-ding of the 10th Iranian Congress of Crop Science. Karaj Iran.

Gomez D, Martinez O, Arona M, Castro A. 2009. Generation a selection index for drought tolerance in sunflower. Water Resources Manage-ment 14(15), 65-70.

Guttieri MJ, Stark JC, Brien K, Souza E. 2010. Relative sensitivity of soybean grain yield and quality parameters to moisture deficit. Crop Sciences 41, 327-335.

Habibi D, Naderi R, Kanbar A, Shakiba MR. 2010. Response of spring canola cultivars to sodium chloride stress. Annual Biology Research 2(5), 312-322.

Khajoeenezhad D, Ruhul Amin Ak, Jahan S, Hasanulzzaman M. 2008. Yield components and yield of three soybean varieties under different irrigation management. American Journal of Sciences Research 4(1), 40-46.

Kumar A, Turner NC. 2012. Growth and sucrose synthase activity of developing soybean seeds under field conditions. Australian Journal of Crop Sciences 3, 20-27.

Loveli S, Perniola M, Ferrara A, Di Tommaso T. 2007. Yield response factor to water (Ky) and water use efficiency of Carthamus tinctorius L. and Solanum melongena L. Agricultural Water Manage-ment 92, 73-80.

Majnooni A, Nazemi AH, Sadraddini A. 2014. Effects of deficit irrigation on the yield, yield components, water and irrigation water use efficiency of spring canola. Journal of Biology and Environment Sciences 5(2), 44-53.

Manavalan LP, Guttikonda SK, Tran LSP, Nguyen HT. 2009. Physiological and Molecular Approaches to Improve Drought Resistance in Soybean. Plant Cell Physiology 50(7), 1260-1276.

Mitra J. 2011. Genetics and genetic improvement of drought resistance in crop plants. Journal of Plant Sciences (80), 758-762.

Mohagheghin A, Rabee B, Kafi Ghasemi A, Jvaherdashti M. 2012. Correlation between morp-hological traitd and grain yield in soybean. Procce-ding of the 10th Iranian Congress of Crop Science. Karaj. Iran.

Ohashi Y, Nakayama N, Saneoka H, Mohapatra, Fujita K. 2010. Differences in the responses of stem diameter and pod thickness to drought stress during the grain filling stage in soybean plants. Acta Physiology Plant 31(2), 271-277.

Pandey RKL, Henera W, Pendleton JW. 2011. Drought response of grain legumes under irrigation gradient: Yield and yield components. Agronomy Journal 76, 549-553.

Pfister S, Koehler A, Hellweg S. 2010. Assessing the environmental impacts of freshwater consumption in LCA Environ. Sciences and Technologies journal (43), 4098–104.

Pourmousavi SM, Gelavi M, Daneshian J, Ghanbari A, Basirani P. 2010. Effect of cattle manure on quantitative and qualitative yield of Soybean  L17  line  under  drought  stress  condition. Iranian Crop Sciences 40(1), 133-146.

Rosielle AA, Hamblin J. 2010.Theoretical aspects of selection for yield in stress and non-stress environments. Crop Sciences 21, 943-946.

Sepahvand M. 2012. Comparison of water require-ment, water productivity and economical water productivity in what at the west of Iran. Field Crop Research 86(1), 67-80.

Sionit N, Kramer PJ. 2007. Effect of after stress during different stages of growth of soybean. Agronomy Journal 69, 274-278.

Sneller CH, Dombek D. 2009. Use of Irrigation in selection for soybean yield potential under drought. Crop Sciences 37, 1141-1147.

Talebi R. 2011. Effective selection criteria for assessing drought stress tolerance in durum wheat (Triticum durum Desf.). Genetic and Plant Physiology (35), 64-74.

Tilman D, Balzer C, Hill J, Befort B. 2011. Global food demand and the sustainable intensi-ication of agriculture Proc. National Academy Science (108), 202-212.

Zarea M, Zynalikhaneghah H, Daneshian J. 2009. An evaluation of tolerance of some soybean-enotypes to drought stress. Iranian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 35(4), 859-867.