Water quality assessment in various land use and land cover of Muleta Watershed Bukidnon, Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/03/2018
Views (1873)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Water quality assessment in various land use and land cover of Muleta Watershed Bukidnon, Philippines

Scarlet Wine L. Dumago, George R. Puno, Sheena S. Ingotan
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 12(3), 201-209, March 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Changes in the land cover and land management practices in Muleta watershed have been considered as one of the key influencing factors behind threats affecting the water quality. The study aims to assess and analyze useful evidence on the influence of various land use/cover on the stream physico-chemical properties of Muleta River based on water quality monitoring data with the water quality guidelines for classification of the DENR Administrative Order No. 2016-08 (DAO 2016-08). Major LULC was delineated using satellite data specifically Landsat 8 OLI of year 2015 and was downloaded from USGS Earth Explorer. The watershed has six (6) existing land cover: forest, agricultural land, bareland, built-up area, grassland and water. The upstream was found to be covered with perennial vegetation; the midstream is used for agriculture and covered with least forest; the downstream was mainly used for residential and utilized for different forms of agriculture. The results obtained from the water quality were compared with existing land use/cover of the watershed at α=0.01 significance level. The result shows that temperature, TSS, nitrates and phosphates are significantly different water quality result in parallel to the LULC of the sampling site. On the other hand, the pH, turbidity, dissolved oxygen, and TDS are not significantly different from each other regardless land cover/land use surrounding the water system. Generally, the result is of great help in developing and implementing watersheds plans to protect land and water resources and improve the overall quality of the watersheds.

Boesch D, Burreson E, Dennison W, Houde E, Kemp M, Kennedy V, Newell R, Paynter K, Orth R, Ulanowicz R. 2001. Factors in the Decline of Coastal Ecosystems. Article of Science. Vol 293, Issue 5535, p.1589-1591.

Chu HJ, Liu CY, Wang CK. 2013. Identifying the Relationship between Water Quality and Land Cover Changes in the Tseng-Wen Reservoir Watershed of Taiwan. 2013. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health. ISSN 1660-4601. p 478-489.

Department of Environment and Natural Resources Administrative Order No. 2016-08 (DENR-DAO No. 2016-08). 2016. Water Quality Guidelines and General Effluent Standards of 2016. Department of Environment and Natural Resources Visayas Avenue, Diliman, Quezon City.

Duxbury B, Eaton K, Kitchen R, Springman K. 2011. Exploration of Land Cover Correlations to Water Quality within the Antietam Creek Watershed: A Case Study. Science of Land Use Change.

Kebede W, Tefera M, Habitamu T, Tolera Alemayehu T. 2014. Impact of Land Cover Change on Water Quality and Stream Flow in Lake Hawassa Watershed of Ethiopia. Agricultural Sciences 5, 647-659. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2014.58068

Michaud JP. 1991. A Citizens Guide to Understanding and Monitoring Lakes and Streams. Publ. # 94-149. Washingston State Department of Ecology, Olympia, USA (360), 407-7472.

United States Environmental Protection Agency (USEPA). 2017. Healthy Watersheds Protection. Ecosystem Benefits and Services.

Related Articles

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.

Carbon sequestration potential of napier (Pennisetum purpureum) grass applied with varying classifications of livestock excrement

Alliah B. Balaba*, Niña Mae R. Villar, Ana Celina T. Soriano, Myrna G. Pabiona, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 50-55, June 2026.

Effects of environmental stressors on morphological traits of Glycine max (L.) Merr. and microbial diversity of soil treated with cadmium and lead

Fortune Onyeuka Otumunye*, Tobore Roseline Agbosa, Boniface Edegbai, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 42-49, June 2026.

SWAT+-based water balance assessment of Ipil watershed in Bohol, Philippines: Spatial and temporal patterns of water availability

Anselmo M. Aurestila*, Proceso M. Castil, Manolito C. Macalolot, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 30-41, June 2026.