Water status of cork oak seedlings (Quercus suber L.) in Tunisia

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2017
Views (323) Download (14)

Water status of cork oak seedlings (Quercus suber L.) in Tunisia

Abdessamad Abdessalem, Saidi Ahmed, Baraket Ghada, Chkioua Chaker, Berrabah Djamel, Salhi Hannachi Amel, Ksontini Mustapha
Int. J. Biosci.10( 2), 37-48, February 2017.
Certificate: IJB 2017 [Generate Certificate]


The Mediterranean forest constitutes a fragile ecosystem subjected to various aggressions closely linked to the conditions of the physical and human environment. A comparative study of the water and physiological responses of young cork oak plants which was carried out on the nursery of twelve sites of cork oak from the North West and North East of Tunisia. In nurseries in Tunis, seedlings were subjected to water stress. The analyzes focus on adapting to physiological water stress in Quercus suber L. show that osmotic adjustment increases considerably in Méjen Essef populations; Dj khroufa and Hammam Bourguiba, which explains why these populations have an important capacity for osmo-regulation allowing the tissues to develop a higher turgor and a strategy of resistance to water stress. Similarly, for populations of Keff El Rand; Oued Zeen; Bellif and Ain Zana; but this is limited in time. A greater decrease in the population of Hammam Jdidi; Dar Fatma, Djebel Zouza; El Feidja  and Beni Mtir  , indicating that they therefore exhibit stress sensitivity water. The differences revealed between the twelve provenances show that the importance of monitoring the physiology of young cork oak seedlings under semi-controlled conditions in order to control better their characteristics with respect to water stress.


Abid H, Selmi K. 1998. Tunisian suberia: Importance and orientation for sustainable management. In: Proceedings Mediterranean seminar on the regeneration of cork oak forests. Annals of INRGREF (National Institute of Research in Engineering, Rural, Water and Forestry), special issue 63-72.

Bejaoui Z, Albouchi A, Lamhamdi MS, El Aouni MH. 2008. Effect of soil drying on growth, biomass allocation and water relationships in casuarina glauca. Botany 86 1242-1251.

Boudy P. 1952. A Guide for Foresters in North Africa. The Rustic  house. Ed. Paris.

Chouchane S. 2003. Comparative study of the resistance to water stress of two provenances of cork oak (altitude and plain). FST (Faculty of Science, Tunis). P 58.

Department of Agriculture and Forest of the Eastern Pyrenees. 1992. Proceedings of the symposium “Mediterranean subarea”.

Ennageh A. 2004. Influence of sampling conditions on water parameters determined by the volume pressure curve technique, Mastère, FST (Faculty of Science, Tunis). P 106.

Fernandez  G,  Effern  A,  Grunwald T,  Pezer N,  Lehnertz K, Dumpelmann M, Van Roost D, Elger CE. 1999. Real-time tracking of memory formation in the human rhinal cortex and hippocampus. Science.

Ghouil H. 2004. Response of the cork oak to the constraints of the environment (Temperature, light and lack of water) Application to the problems of regeneration of the suberia, Doctoral thesis.

Haddad  I. 2002. Water status in the drought adaptation of 5 species of Eucalyptus most used in reforestation in Tunisia. University of Tunis El Manar. 62 p.

Hasnaoui  B. 1992. Northern oak groves of Tunisia. Ecology and Regeneration. Doctoral Thesis, Univ. From Provence to Aix-en-Provence.

Hasnaoui  B. 1998. Natural regeneration of cork oak: difficulties and proposals for solutions, Ann. INRGREF (National Institute of Research in Engineering, Rural, Water and Forestry), Special issue.

Henchi  B. 1987.  Effects of water stress on the ecology and ecophysiology of Plantago albicans L. Thesis Doc. State. Univ. Tunis. P 314.

Hessini K, Ghandour M, Albouchi A, Soltani A, Koyro HW, Abdelly C. 2008. Biomass production, photosynthesis, and leaf water relations of Spartina alterniflora under moderate water stress. Journal of Plant Research 121, 311–318.

Hireche  Y. 2006. Response of alfalfa (Medicago Sativa L) to  water stress and seeding depth. Al HadJ Lakdar University Hubac, C., Vieira, Da Silva, J. Metabolic indicators of mesological stresses. Vegetable Physiology, 18, 45-53.

Ksontini M. 1996. Eco-physiological studies of the responses to the water stress of the cork oak (Quercus suber) in Northern Tunisia: Comparison of the oak Kermès (Quercus coccifera) and the oak Zeen (Quercus canariensis), Thesis doctor of the University, 157.

Maier CE, Newton RJ, Puryear JD, Sen S. 1992. Physiological responses of loblolly pine (Pinus taeda L.) Seedling to drought stress, osmotic adjustment and tissue elasticity. Journal of plant physiology 140, 754-760 p.

Meloni DA, Oliva MA, Ruiz HA, Martinez CA. 2001. Contribution of proline and inorganic solutes to osmotic  adjustment in cotton under salt stress. Journal of Plant Nutrition 24, 599–612.

Mguis K, Albouchi A, Khadhri A, Abassi M, Yakoubi-Tej M, Mahjoub A, Ouerghi Z, Ben Brahim N. 2012. Adjustments in leaf water relations of wild wheat relative Aegilops geniculata Roth. and wheat (Triticum durum Desf.) plants grown in a salinity gradient. Australian Journal of Crop Science 6, 768–776.

Mougou  A. 1984. Evaluation of drought resistance by morphological, eco – physiological and biochemical parameters in several Tomato species, Ph.D Thesis. University of Gent, Belgium.

Nabil M, Coudret A. 1995. Effects of sodium chloride on growth tissue elasticity and solute adjustment in two: Acacia nilotica sub species. Physiology plant 93, 217-224. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j 1399-3054.1995tb 0222 o.x.

Patakas A, Noitsakis B. 1999. Mechanisms involved in diurnal changes of osmotic potential in grapevines under drought conditions. Journal of  Plant Physiology 154, 767–774.

Patakas A, Nikolaou N, Zioziou K, Radoglou K, Noitsakis B. 2002. The role of organic solute and ion accumulation in osmotic adjustment in drought-stressed grapevines. Plant Science 163, 361–367.

Rejeb MN. 1992. Study of the drought resistance mechanisms of carob (ceratonia siliqua L.). Doctoral Thesis in Natural sciences Faculty of Sciences of Tunis. P 199.

Ritchie GA, Dunham DL. 1979. Pressure volume curves. In: Theory, methods interpretation. Western Forestry Research center, Centralia, Washington.

ROY G. 1980. Rue Des Chambault, Montreal, Stanké, 303 p.

Scholander PF, Hammel HT, Bradstreet ED, Hemmingsen EA. 1965. Sap pressure in vascular plants. Science 148, 339–346.

Turner NC, Jones MM. 1980. Turgor maintenance by osmotic adjustment. A review and evaluation. In: Adaptation of plants to water and high temperature (Turner N.C. and Kramer P.J. Eds) 87 and 454 New York John Wiley and Sons.

Weatherley PE, Slatyer RO. 1957. Relationship between relative Physiol. 120: 391–399. Turgidity and diffusion pressure deficit in leaves. Nature (London). 179. 1080-1087 p.

Yaakoub  B. 1997. Hydric relations and formation of caulinary adventitious roots in black spruce seedlings (Picea mariana (Mili) Plant biology.

YESSAD  SA. 2000. Cork oak and oak in the countries of the Western Mediterranean. Edition ASBL Forest Wallonne. P 190.