Yield performance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) under the application of different herbicides
Paper Details
Yield performance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) under the application of different herbicides
Abstract
The study was aim to find out the suitable herbicides and their performance on controlling weeds in mungbean field. Three varieties (V1 = BARI Mung-5, V2 = BARI Mung-6, V3= BARI Mung-4) and four herbicides (T1 = Whipsuper, T2 = Panida 33 EC, T3 = Paraxon, T4 = Topstar 40 WP) were used in this experiment with a Randomized Complete Block Design (RCBD) design using three replications. The results indicated that both the varieties and herbicides and also their interactions significantly affected all observed parameters. The highest number of pods plant-1 (23.44), number of seeds pod-1 (15.41), 1000-seed weight (54.54 g), pod yield (2827.63 kg ha-1), seed yield (1893 kg ha-1) and harvest index (24.98%) were found from the combine effect of BARI Mung-6 with Topstar 40 WP. From the results it was concluded that herbicide Topstar 40 WP showed the best performance by maximum reduction of weed population in BARI Mung-6 and further this experiment may be carry out in different locations of Bangladesh in different season.
Aktar S, Hossain MA, Amin MR, Khatun F, Begum A. 2016. Efficacy of herbicides in controlling weeds in Mungbean (Vigna radiata L. Wilczek) Field. The Agriculturist 13, 127- 132. https://doi.org/10.3329/agric.v13i1.26556
Ali S, Patel JC, Desai LJ, Singh J. 2011. Effect of herbicides on weeds and yield of rainy season green gram (Vigna radiatal L. Wilczek). Legume Research 34, 300- 303.
Arif M, Khan MA, Habib A, Sajjad A. 2006. Prospects of wheat as a dual purpose crop and its impact on weeds. Pakistan Journal of Weed Science and Research 12, 13- 17.
Asante SK, Tamo M, Jackai LEN. 2002. Integrated management of cowpea insect pests using elite cultivars date of planting and minimum insecticide application. African Crop Science Journal 3, 23– 25.
BARI. 2013. Hand book of agricultural technology. Bangladesh Agricultural Research Institute, Joydebpur, Gazipur, Bangladesh, 01- 215.
Bibi S, Khan IA. 2016. Impact of weed control techniques on intercropping of mungbean with maize under agro climate condition of Peshawar. Sarhad Journal of Agriculture 32, 62-69. http://dx.doi.org/10.17582/journal.sja/2016/32.2.62.69
Chaudhari VD, Desai LJ, Chaudhari SN, Chaudhari PR. 2016. Effect of weed management on weeds, growth and yield of summer green gram. The Bioscan 11, 531- 534.
Cheema ZA, Khaliq A, Akhtar S. 2001. Use of sorgaab (sorghum water extract) as a natural weed inhibitor in spring mungbean. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 3, 515– 518.
Duncan DB. 1955. Multiple range and multiple F-tests, Biometrica, II. 11, 1- 42.
FAO (Food and Agriculture Organization). Agriculture, pesticides, food security and food safety, 140- 151.
Ghafoor A, Ahmad Z, Quyyum A. 2003. Black grain (Vigna mungo L. Hepper) germplasm catalogue, plant genetic resources programme, PARC/JIGA, Ohio, 17.
Gupta OP. 2003. Weed management: Principles and Practices. 2nd edition. Agribios India, 11- 24 & 77- 101.
Heap. 2014. International survey of herbicide resistant weeds. Accessed November 1, 2014. www.weedscience.org.
Hoorman JJ, Islam R, Sundermeier A. 2009. Sustainable crop rotations with cover crops, Ohio State University, Extension.
Khaliq A, Matloob A, Mahmood S, Abbas RN, Khan MB. 2012. Seeding density and herbicide tank mixtures furnish better weed control and improve growth, yield and quality of direct seeded fine rice. International Journal of Agriculture and Biology 14, 499-508.
Khan RU, Rashid A, Khan MS. 2011. Impact of various rates of pendimethalin herbicide on weed control, seed yield and economic returns in mungbean under rainfed conditions. Journal of Agricultural Research 49, 491- 498.
Lambridges CJ, Godwin ID. 2006. Mungbean’, in K. Chittarajan (ed.), Genome mapping and molecular breeding in plants. Wagenigen 3, 69– 90.
Lertmongkol S, Sarobol E, Premasthira CU. 2011. Allelopathic effects of mungbean (Vigna radiata) on subsequent crops. Witthayasan Kasetsart (Sakha Witthayasat). Kasetsart Journal- Natural Science 45, 773- 779.
Punia SS, Malik RS, Yadav A, Rinwa RS. 2004. Effect of varying density of Cyperus rotundus, Echinochloa colona and Trianthemaportula castrum on mungbean. Indian Journal of Weed Science 36, 280– 281.
Raman R, Krishnamoorthy R. 2005. Nodulation and yield of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) influenced by integrated weed management practices. Legume Research 28, 128– 130.
Shafique M, Nadeem S, Hamed M, Atta BM, Shah TM. 2009. Performance of some advance desi chickpea genotypes against pod borer, Helicoverpa armigera (Hubner) resistance. Pakistan Journal of Zoology 41, 277- 280.
Soltani N, Shropshire C, Sikkema PH. 2013. Tolerance of mungbean to post emergence herbicides. Agricultural Science 4, 558- 562. http://dx.doi.org/10.4236/as.2013.410075
Sumalapao DEP, Tuppil CG, Urtula AAC, Valdestamon DM, Villanueva LMD, Ledesma NAA. 2018. Tolerance of mung bean (Vigna radiata (L.) wilczek) to lactic acid, a potential herbicide: growth and morphology. Journal of Animal and Plant Science 28, 138- 145.
Tamang D, Nath R, Sengupta K. 2015. Effect of herbicide application on weed management in green gram [Vigna radiata (L.) Wilczek]. Advances in Crop Science and Technology. http://dx.doi.org/10.4172/2329-8863.1000163.
Walsh MJ, Powles SB. 2007. Management strategies for herbicide-resistant weed populations in Australian dry land crop production systems. Weed Technology 21, 332- 338. https://doi.org/10.1614/WT-06-086.1
Md. Anisur Rahman, Md. Monabber Hossain, Mir Istiak Ahmed Rokib, Md. Jafar Ullah, Md. Saidur Rahman, 2019. Yield performance of mungbean (Vigna radiata L.) under the application of different herbicides. Int. J. Biosci., 14(3), 325-334.
Copyright © 2019 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.