Yield quality response (YQR) of pepper under variable water application using micro-sprinkler system

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2012
Views (715)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Yield quality response (YQR) of pepper under variable water application using micro-sprinkler system

F. Alao, A.J. Oloruntade, K.O. Mogaji
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 2(6), 23-27, June 2012.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2012; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Yield quality response of pepper (Capsicum annum) under variable water application was examined during two off-seasons of 2007/08 and 2008/09 at the Agricultural Engineering Research Farm of the Federal University of Technology, Akure, Nigeria. The crop was irrigated using micro-sprinkler system that allowed three treatments 1, 2, 3 at 0.5 WR (water requirements) of pepper, 0.75 WR, and 1 WR respectively. The experiment was repeated twice and irrigation was carried out at 3-day interval. Soil and agronomic measurements were carried out at each treatment during the experiments while moisture content was monitored weekly using gravimetric method. Measurements made included leaf area index (LAI) and crop yield (results not shown), plant height (PH), fruit number (FN), fruit length (FL) and Fruit Width (FW). Results showed that the growth of pepper were not statistically different among treatments at the 5% level of significance. Plant height responded positively to increased water application and thus influencing yield positively. Yield of pepper was highest at the highest water application, ranging from 20.1 t/ha (2007/08) to 21.1 t/ha (2008/09); fruit number ranged between 21 to 19 for the highest treatment in 2007/08 and 2008/09 respectively while fruit length and fruit width also increased with increasing water application. It was then concluded that variations in water application might significantly influence yield quality such as fruit number, fruit length and fruit width at harvest. Variable irrigation water application for field grown pepper is therefore recommended for higher and better quality yields.

AVRDC. 1989. Tomato and the pepper production in the tropic. AVRDC; Taiwan. P. 585.

Dagdelen N, Yilmaz E, Sezgin F, Gurbuz T. 2004. Effects of Water Stress at Different growth Stages on Processing Pepper (Capsicum annum Cv. Kapija) Yield Water use and Quality Characteristics. Pakistan Journal of Biological Sciences 7(12), 2167-2172.

Olalla F, Valero JA. 1994. Growth and production of bell pepper under different irrigation intervals. Research series Arkansas – Agric Experimental Station. P. 125 -128.

Ngouajio M, Wang G, Goldy RG. 2008. Timing of Drip Irrigation Initiation Affects Irrigation Water Use Efficiency and Yield of Bell Pepper Under Plastic Mulch. Journal of HorticulturalTechnology 18(3), 397-402.

Pitts DJ, Clarke GA. 1991. Comparison of drip irrigation to sub- irrigation for tomato production in southwest Florida. Applied Engineering Agric 7(2), 117 -184.

Sezen SM, Yazar A, Eker S. 2006. Effect of drip irrigation regimes on yield and quality of field grown bell pepper. Agric. Water Manage 81, 115– 131.

Sezen SM, Yazar A, Eker S. 2011. Yield and quality response of drip-irrigated pepper under Mediterranean climatic conditions to various water regimes. African Journal of Biotechnology 10(8), p. 1329-1339.

Tekinel O, yazar A, Cevik B, Kanber R. 1989. Ex-post evaluation of the Lower Seyhan Project in Turkey. In: Irrigation Theory and Practice (Eds. J. R. Rydzewski and C.F. Ward). Pentech Press. London. p. 145-152.

Related Articles

Agronomic performance of erect and semi-erect cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.) genotypes in the Bragantina Region of Pará, Brazil

João Elias Lopes Fernandes Rodrigues*, Sônia Maria Botelho Araújo, Maria Carolina Sarto Fernandes Rodrigues, Mauricio Willians de Lima, Eraldo Ferreira Rodrigues, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(4), 6-10, April 2026.

Colorimeter determination of starch damaged in flour in Juba, South Sudan

Jackson Venusto Modi Lado*, Charles Majak Kuot, Adhar Lonagr Awich, Dominic Wol Athian, Lazarus Pirentino Lugoi, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(4), 1-5, April 2026.

The effectiveness of interest-free loans as startup capital: Empirical evidence from poultry farmers in Tubah Sub-Division, North West Region, Cameroon

Nyamka Milton Kibebsii*, Bime Mary Juliet Egwu, Anguh Ngenwie Sandrine, Tsi Evaristus Angwafo, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(3), 15-21, March 2026.

Effects of access to agricultural microcredit on the multidimensional well-being of households in Borgou, Benin

Tahirou Koda Adam*, Alexis Hougni, Jacob Afouda Yabi, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(3), 7-14, March 2026.

Optimization of LED light traps enhances pest selectivity and energy efficiency in shallot agroecosystems

Sulkifli*, Afdal, Andi Bonewati, Eka Sudartik, Andi Cakra Yusuf, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(3), 1-6, March 2026.

Diagnosis of soil fertility and market gardening systems in the department of Sinématiali (Lokoli and Pegnankaha), northern Ivory Coast

Siaka Coulibaly*, Krogba Yves Nangah, Kouamé Firmin Konan, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 39-50, February 2026.

Analysis of soil fertility status based on pH, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium parameters across different land locations in south Kalimantan

Hastirullah Fitrah*, Agung Cahyo Legowo, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 34-38, February 2026.

Evaluation of the distribution of Irvingia gabonensis in the peripheral zone of Taï national park (South-West, Ivory Coast)

Ybo Marc Gboazo*, Coulibaly Siendou, Traoré-Ouattara Karidia, Diarrassouba Abdoulaye, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 23-33, February 2026.