Evaluation of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetic patient

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2019
Views (470)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluation of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetic patient

Bahrul Amin, Mukhtiar Ahmad, Asad Khan, Naqash Ahmad, Ayesha Jehad
Int. J. Biosci. 15(6), 450-455, December 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Difficult airway is the critical phase in which well-trained anesthesiologist unable to visualize any part of vocal cords facing hurdles in upper airway to ventilate the patient with facemask or with endotracheal tube to secure the patient ventilation. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of difficult intubation and difficult laryngoscopy in diabetic patients undergoing general anesthesia. A cross sectional study was conducted at Mardan medical complex for which convenient sampling, which is a type of non-random sampling techniques, was used for collection of data from the subjects. A total 50 diabetic patients undergoing general anesthesia were preoperatively assessed for their airway manipulation using different airway indices and physical examination. Out of 50 participants, (84%) n = 42 were female and only (16%) n = 8 were male. The mean age of the subjects was 51.9 ± 11.3. After observing all the 50 participants for difficult intubation, among them (32%) n = 16 participants faced the difficult laryngoscopy while rests of the (64%) n = 34 were easily intubated. From this study, we observed that diabetic patients were more prone to difficult laryngoscopy and the only reason we found was limited mobility of the neck and less mouth opening in them. We also assumed from this study that a short term diabetic patient has no such changes in their neck mobility and mouth opening due to they were less exposed to the disease.

Basaranoglu G, Columb M, Lyons G. 2010. Failure to predict difficult tracheal intubation for emergency caesarean section. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 27(11), 947–949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833e2656.

Bellhouse CP, Dore C. 1988. Criteria for estimating likelihood of difficulty of endotracheal intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 16(3), p 329–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0310057×8801600315.

Benumof JL. 1991. Management of the difficult adult airway. With special emphasis on awake tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology, p 1087–1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199112000-00021.

Brismar B, Hedenstierna G, Lundquist H, Strandberg A, Svensson LTL. 1985. No TPulmonary densities during anesthesia with muscular relaxation. A proposal of atelectasis itle’, Anesthesiology 62 (422), p 422–8.

Chang K, Uitto J, Rowold EA, Grant GA, Kilo C, Williamson JR. 1980. Increased collagen cross-linkages in experimental diabetes. Reversal by β-aminopropionitrile and D-penicillamine’, Diabetes 29(10), p 778–781. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.10.778.

Eleborg L, Norberg Å. 1988. Are diabetic patients difficult to intubate?, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 508–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13996576.1988.tb02776.x.

Hogan K, Rusy D, Springman SR. 1989. Difficult laryngoscopy and diabetes mellitus. Anesthesia and analgesia 69(3), 419–20. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2672897.

Hogan K, Rusy D, Springman SR. 1988. Difficult laryngoscopy and diabetes mellitus. Anesthesia and analgesia 67(12), 1162–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3057934.

Katz JA. 2012. 4th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Anesthesiology. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 116(2), 496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e31823cf122.

Kim WH, Ahn HJ, Lee CJ, Shin BS, Ko JS, Choi SJ. 2011. Neck circumference to thyromental distance ratio: a new predictor of difficult intubation in obese patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 106(5), p 743–748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer024.

Leasher JL, Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Naidoo K. 2016. Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by diabetic retinopathy. A meta-analysis from 1990 to 2010 Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association Inc 39(9), p 1643–1649. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc15-2171.

Nadal JLY, Fernandez BG, Escobar IC, Black M, Rosenblatt WH. 1998. The palm print as a sensitive predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetics’, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Blackwell Munksgaard 42(2), p 199–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13996576.1998.tb05109.x.

Reissell E, orko R, maunuksela EAL, lindgren l. 1990. Predictability of difficult laryngoscopy in patients with long-term diabetes mellitus. Anaesthesia 45(12), p 1024–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13652044.1990.tb14879.x.

Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. 2013. Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway An Updated Anesthesiology 118(2), p 251–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2.

Shorten GD, Opie NJ, Graziotti P, Morris I, Khangure M. 1994. Assessment of upper airway anatomy in awake sedated and anaesthetised patients using magnetic resonance imaging Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 22(2), p 165–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0310057×9402200208.

Stevanovic K, Sabljak V, Toskovic A, Kukic B, Stekovic J, Antonijevic V. 2015. Anaesthesia and the patient with diabetes’, Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews 9(3), p177–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2015.04.001.

WHO. Global report on diabetes. WHO. Available at: https://www.who.int/diabetes/global-report/en/

Wyatt LH, Ferrance RJ. 2006. ‘The musculoskeletal effects of diabetes mellitus. J Can Chiropr Assoc 50(1), p 43–50.

Yildiz TS, Korkmaz F, Solak M, Toker K, Erciyes N, Bayrak F. 2007. Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation in Turkish patients: A multi-center methodological study. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 24(12), p 1034–1040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026502150700052X

Related Articles

Implications of aberrant glycosylation on age-related disease progression

Tahmid Ahmad Patwary, Mukramur Rahman, Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 176-188, August 2025.

Design and development of solar powered water sprayer: A green technology innovation

Lorenzo V. Sugod, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 159-175, August 2025.

Knowledge, attitudes, practices, and social awareness regarding SARS-CoV-2 infection in the kyrgyz population in the post-pandemic period

Mirza Masroor Ali Beg, Haider Ali, Yahya Nur Ahmed, Yavuz Gunduz, Hafsa Develi, Tilekeeva UM, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 151-158, August 2025.

Tumor suppressing ability of myrtenal in DMBA-induced rat mammary cancer: A biochemical and histopathological evaluation

Manoharan Pethanasamy, Shanmugam M. Sivasankaran, Saravanan Surya, Raju Kowsalya, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 141-150, August 2025.

Assessing tree diversity in cashew plantations: Environmental and agronomic determinants in buffer zones of Mont Sangbé National Park, western Côte d’Ivoire

Kouamé Christophe Koffi, Kouakou Hilaire Bohoussou, Serge Cherry Piba, Naomie Ouffoue, Sylvestre Gagbe, Alex Beda, Adama Tondossama, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 122-133, August 2025.

Anthelmintic potential of powdered papaya seed Carica papaya in varying levels against Ascaridia galli in broiler chicken

Roniemay P. Sayson, Mylene G. Millapez, Zandro O. Perez, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 114-121, August 2025.

Valorization of fish scale waste for the synthesis of functional gelatin-based biopolymers

N. Natarajan Arun Nagendran, B. Balakrishnan Rajalakshmi, C. Chellapandi Balachandran, Jayabalan Viji, Int. J. Biosci. 27(2), 102-113, August 2025.