Evaluation of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetic patient

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2019
Views (857)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Evaluation of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetic patient

Bahrul Amin, Mukhtiar Ahmad, Asad Khan, Naqash Ahmad, Ayesha Jehad
Int. J. Biosci. 15(6), 450-455, December 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Difficult airway is the critical phase in which well-trained anesthesiologist unable to visualize any part of vocal cords facing hurdles in upper airway to ventilate the patient with facemask or with endotracheal tube to secure the patient ventilation. The aim of this study was to find out the incidence of difficult intubation and difficult laryngoscopy in diabetic patients undergoing general anesthesia. A cross sectional study was conducted at Mardan medical complex for which convenient sampling, which is a type of non-random sampling techniques, was used for collection of data from the subjects. A total 50 diabetic patients undergoing general anesthesia were preoperatively assessed for their airway manipulation using different airway indices and physical examination. Out of 50 participants, (84%) n = 42 were female and only (16%) n = 8 were male. The mean age of the subjects was 51.9 ± 11.3. After observing all the 50 participants for difficult intubation, among them (32%) n = 16 participants faced the difficult laryngoscopy while rests of the (64%) n = 34 were easily intubated. From this study, we observed that diabetic patients were more prone to difficult laryngoscopy and the only reason we found was limited mobility of the neck and less mouth opening in them. We also assumed from this study that a short term diabetic patient has no such changes in their neck mobility and mouth opening due to they were less exposed to the disease.

Basaranoglu G, Columb M, Lyons G. 2010. Failure to predict difficult tracheal intubation for emergency caesarean section. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 27(11), 947–949. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/EJA.0b013e32833e2656.

Bellhouse CP, Dore C. 1988. Criteria for estimating likelihood of difficulty of endotracheal intubation with the Macintosh laryngoscope, Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 16(3), p 329–337. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0310057×8801600315.

Benumof JL. 1991. Management of the difficult adult airway. With special emphasis on awake tracheal intubation. Anesthesiology, p 1087–1110. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/00000542-199112000-00021.

Brismar B, Hedenstierna G, Lundquist H, Strandberg A, Svensson LTL. 1985. No TPulmonary densities during anesthesia with muscular relaxation. A proposal of atelectasis itle’, Anesthesiology 62 (422), p 422–8.

Chang K, Uitto J, Rowold EA, Grant GA, Kilo C, Williamson JR. 1980. Increased collagen cross-linkages in experimental diabetes. Reversal by β-aminopropionitrile and D-penicillamine’, Diabetes 29(10), p 778–781. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/diacare.20.10.778.

Eleborg L, Norberg Å. 1988. Are diabetic patients difficult to intubate?, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica 508–508. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13996576.1988.tb02776.x.

Hogan K, Rusy D, Springman SR. 1989. Difficult laryngoscopy and diabetes mellitus. Anesthesia and analgesia 69(3), 419–20. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/2672897.

Hogan K, Rusy D, Springman SR. 1988. Difficult laryngoscopy and diabetes mellitus. Anesthesia and analgesia 67(12), 1162–5. http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/3057934.

Katz JA. 2012. 4th National Audit Project of the Royal College of Anaesthetists and the Difficult Airway Society. Anesthesiology. Ovid Technologies (Wolters Kluwer Health) 116(2), 496. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/aln.0b013e31823cf122.

Kim WH, Ahn HJ, Lee CJ, Shin BS, Ko JS, Choi SJ. 2011. Neck circumference to thyromental distance ratio: a new predictor of difficult intubation in obese patients. British Journal of Anaesthesia 106(5), p 743–748. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/bja/aer024.

Leasher JL, Bourne RRA, Flaxman SR, Jonas JB, Keeffe J, Naidoo K. 2016. Global estimates on the number of people blind or visually impaired by diabetic retinopathy. A meta-analysis from 1990 to 2010 Diabetes Care. American Diabetes Association Inc 39(9), p 1643–1649. http://dx.doi.org/10.2337/dc15-2171.

Nadal JLY, Fernandez BG, Escobar IC, Black M, Rosenblatt WH. 1998. The palm print as a sensitive predictor of difficult laryngoscopy in diabetics’, Acta Anaesthesiologica Scandinavica. Blackwell Munksgaard 42(2), p 199–203. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13996576.1998.tb05109.x.

Reissell E, orko R, maunuksela EAL, lindgren l. 1990. Predictability of difficult laryngoscopy in patients with long-term diabetes mellitus. Anaesthesia 45(12), p 1024–7. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.13652044.1990.tb14879.x.

Report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Management of the Difficult Airway. 2013. Practice Guidelines for Management of the Difficult Airway An Updated Anesthesiology 118(2), p 251–270. http://dx.doi.org/10.1097/ALN.0b013e31827773b2.

Shorten GD, Opie NJ, Graziotti P, Morris I, Khangure M. 1994. Assessment of upper airway anatomy in awake sedated and anaesthetised patients using magnetic resonance imaging Anaesthesia and Intensive Care 22(2), p 165–169. http://dx.doi.org/10.1177/0310057×9402200208.

Stevanovic K, Sabljak V, Toskovic A, Kukic B, Stekovic J, Antonijevic V. 2015. Anaesthesia and the patient with diabetes’, Diabetes & Metabolic Syndrome Clinical Research & Reviews 9(3), p177–179. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.dsx.2015.04.001.

WHO. Global report on diabetes. WHO. Available at: https://www.who.int/diabetes/global-report/en/

Wyatt LH, Ferrance RJ. 2006. ‘The musculoskeletal effects of diabetes mellitus. J Can Chiropr Assoc 50(1), p 43–50.

Yildiz TS, Korkmaz F, Solak M, Toker K, Erciyes N, Bayrak F. 2007. Prediction of difficult tracheal intubation in Turkish patients: A multi-center methodological study. European Journal of Anaesthesiology 24(12), p 1034–1040. http://dx.doi.org/10.1017/S026502150700052X

Related Articles

In vitro assessment of the anticancer activity of quinaldic acid against human breast cancer cells (MCF-7)

N. Medhavi, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, K. Harish, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(3), 1-10, September 2026.

In silico molecular docking analysis of quinaldic acid against cancer related targets

N. Medhavi, K. Harish, S. M. Sivasankaran, K. Selvakumar, B. Vidhyambigai, S. Manoharan*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 129-139, August 2026.

First records of Macrogyrodactylus clarii and six species of Quadriacanthus (Monogenea) infecting Clarias gariepinus (Burchell, 1822) across four localities in Senegal

Arfang Diamanka*, Abdou Toure, Sikhou Drame, Cheikh Diop, Ngor Faye, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 118-128, August 2026.

Comparative predictive performance of anthropometric indices and associated risk factors for obesity among Beninese adults: A cross-sectional study

Ganlaky D. Boris, Sègbo Julien A. Gaetan*, Dossou David, Sossa J. Charles, Akpovi D. Casimir, Agbangla Clement, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 105-117, August 2026.

Proximate, mineral and vitamin composition of Uvaria chamae P. Beauv. (Annonaceae) seed flour from Korhogo, northern Côte d’Ivoire

Nyamien Yves Bleouh Jean*, Anon Attoh Hyacinthe, Diallo Koffi, Biego Godi Henri, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 97-104, August 2026.

Acute toxicity of seeds from Sphenostylis stenocarpa (Hochst ex A. Rich.) Harms

Wilfried Zanmenou*, Razack Osseni, Mahouglo Barnabé Houessou, Chimène Agrippine Rodogune Yelouassi, Comlan Kintomagnimessè Célestin Tchekessi, Philippe Sessou, Anatole Laleye, Pierre Dossou-Yovo, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 89-96, August 2026.

Stabilization of cashew apple juice with chitosan: clarification and microbiological quality

Kokora Aya Philomène*, Coulibaly Adama, Cissé Mohamed, Coulibaly Bintou, Konan N’guessan Ysidor, Godi Henri Marius Biego, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 76-88, August 2026.

Implementation and evaluation of limited face to face classes: basis for adoption of health and safety manual

Christian Jude B. Calunsag*, Int. J. Biosci. 29(2), 65-75, August 2026.