Effects of nitrogen and phosphorous use efficiency on the growth and yield of tomato

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2019
Views (752)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effects of nitrogen and phosphorous use efficiency on the growth and yield of tomato

Md Shariful Islam, Fatema Akter, M. M Hossain, Md. Abu Sayem Jiku, Ashutus Singha, Muhiuddin Faruquee
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 14(4), 21-26, April 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The study was to evaluate the effect of nitrogen (N) and phosphorous (P) on the growth and yield component of tomato. The treatments were four levels of N (N0: 0kg N/ha, N100: 100kg N/ha, N150: 150kg N/ha and N200: 200kg N/ha) and four levels of P (P0: 0kg P2O5/ha, P50: 50kg P2O5/ha, P100: 100kg P2O5/ha and p150: 150kg P2O5/ha). The result of the study revealed that number of flowers per plant, number of fruits of plant and fruit weight per plant increased significantly with increasing N level up to 200kg N/ha, whereas fruit yield increased significantly up to 200kg N/ha. All these parameters also increased significantly with increasing the level of P up to 150kg P2O5 /ha. However, from this study it may be concluded that application of N200 and 150kg P2O5 per hectare maximize the higher yield of tomato.

BBS. 2010. Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 117.

BBS. 2012. Yearbook of Agricultural Statistics of Bangladesh, Bangladesh Bureau of Statistics, Statistics Division, Ministry of Planning, Government of the People’s Republic of Bangladesh, Dhaka. 108.

Begum MEA, Islam MN, Alam QM, Hossain SMB. 2011. Profitability of Some Bari Released Crop Varieties in Some Locations of Bangladesh. Bangladesh Journal of Agricultural Science.

Candilo MDL, Leoni C, Silvestri GP. 1993. Sulphur, phosphorus and potassium in processing tomato in high alkaline soil. Advanced Horticultural Sciences 7(2), 57-60.

Chung SJ, Seo BS, Lee BS. 1992. Effects of nitrogen, potassium levels and their interaction on the growth and development of hydroponically grown tomato. Journal of Korean Society of Horticultural Sciences 33(3), 244-251.

FAO. 2011. Production Yearbook, Food and Agricultural Organization of the United Nations, Rome, Italy 236.

Gomez KA, Gomez AA. 1984. Statistical Procedure for Agricultural Research (2ndedn.). Int Rice Res. Inst., A Willey of International Sciences., Publication 28-192.

Grela LM, Delgado NM, Jimenez RR, Huerres PC, Grela LH. 1988. Effect of different nitrogen rates and plant spacing on growth and development of commercial tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill.) cultivars. Cetro-Agricola 15(4), 55-62.

Gupta A, Shukla V. 1977. Response of tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum Mill) to plant spacing, nitrogen, phosphorous and potassium fertilization. Indian Journal of Horticultural Sciences 33, 270-276.

Manange EZ, Uriyo AP, Singh BR. 1982. Effects of fertilizer nitrogen and phosphorous on tomato. Beitriigezurtropischen land wirtschaft and veterinarmedizin Dares Salaam University, Morogoro, Tanzania 20(3), 247-253.

Mukhopadhyay D, Eunus M, Haque MM. 1986. Response of major crop to balanced fertilizer application. DA. E and FAO, Publication, Field Document 5, p-1.

Nassar HH. 1988. Effect of planting pattern, plant population and nitrogen level on yield and quality of tomato. Acta Horticultural 190, 435-442.

Razia S, Islam MS. 1980. The effect of phosphatic fertilizer on the yield of tomato. Bangladesh Horticultural Science 8(2), 29-31.

Samshunnahar M, Khanum R, Islam MS. 2016. Profitability of Small-Scale Tomato (Lycopersicon esculentum) Production in Some Selected Areas in Bangladesh. The Agriculturists. A Scientific Journal of Krishi Foundation 14(1), 73-82.

Sharma CB, Mann HS. 1971. Relative response of phosphatic fertilizers at varying levels of nitrogen and phosphorous in tomato. Indian Journal of Horticultural Science 28(1), 46-54.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.