Effects of biochar on soil chemical properties in relation at different intervals

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2018
Views (1042)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Effects of biochar on soil chemical properties in relation at different intervals

Zafar Ullah, Aurang Zaib Jamali, Mohammad Ali, Bismillah Khan, Sarfraz Yousaf, Tariq Ziad
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 12(5), 271-276, May 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

A field study was conducted at research farm of Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi, to find the relation between biochar application rates and days after its application on soil pH, EC, TOC, Nitrate-Nitrogen, extractable phosphorus and available potassium. Samples were taken from 0-15 cm depth at 0 days, 60 days, and 120 days of biochar application. Biochar were made from wheat straw and sugarcane bagasse, and applied at the rate of 5 and 10 t/ha of both type. Results showed no significant change in soil pH, Nitrate, and Nitrogen. While soil electrical conductivity, total organic carbon, phosphorus and potassium showed significant increase. Soil EC increased by 24% in treatment sugarcane bagasse at 10 t/ha after 120 days of its application. 36% increase was observed in total organic carbon in soil treated with sugarcane bagasse biochar at 10 t/ha after 60 days of its application. Soils treated with 10 t/ha wheat straw biochar and sugarcane bagasse biochar showed 27% and 26% increase in extractable phosphorus respectively after 60 days of its application. Biochar (wheat straw) applied at 10 t/ha elevated soil extractable potassium 10.7% after 120 days of its application and 10.3% increase was observed after 60 days of its application.

Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S. 2007. Agronomic values of green waste biochar as a soil amendment. Australian Journal of Soil Research 45, 629-634.

Chan KY, Van Zwieten L, Meszaros I, Downie A, Joseph S. 2008. Using poultry litter biochars as soil amendments. Soil Research 46, 437- 444.

Chan KY, Xu Z. 2009. Biochar: nutrient properties and their enhancement. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science and Technology 1, 67- 84.

Gaskin JW, Speir RA, Harris K, Das KC, Lee RD, Morris LA, Fisher DS. 2010. Effect of peanut hull and pine chip biochar on soil nutrients, corn nutrient status, and yield. Agronomy Journal 102, 623- 633.

Gee GW, Bauder, JW. 1986. Particle size analysis. In: A. Klute, (ed.), Methods of soil analysis, American Society of Agronomy. No. 9. Madison, Wisconsin p. 383- 411.

Huang M, Yang L, Qin H, Jiang L, Zou Y. 2013. Quantifying the effect of biochar amendment on soil quality and crop productivity in Chinese rice paddies. Field Crops Research 154, 172-179.

Jeffery K, Suto K, Astumoto KM, Garcia C, Sonolci T, Sanchez­Monedero MA. 2011. Chemical and biochemical characterisation of biochar­blended composts prepared from poultry manure. Biological Research & Technology 110, 396-404.

Knicker M. 2007. Optimization of water using carbon-based adsorbents. Australian Journal of Soil Research 183, 249-255.

Laird DA. 2008. The Charcoal Vision: A Win–Win–Win Scenario for Simultaneously Producing Bioenergy, Permanently Sequestering Carbon, while Improving Soil and Water Quality. Agronomy Journal 100, 178-81.

Lehmann J, Joseph S. 2009. Biochar for environmental management: an introduction. In: Lehmann J, Joseph S. Eds. Biochar for Environmental Management: Science & Technology p. 1-12.

Mc Lean SE. 1982. Soil analytical methods. Advance Agronomy 105, 47-82.

Miller DE, Aarstad JS. 2012. Calculation of the drainage component of soil water depletion. Soil Science 118, 11-15.

Nelson DW, Sommers L. 1982. Total carbon, organic carbon, and organic matter1. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2. Chemical and microbiological properties 2, 539-579.

Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Watts DW, Busscher WJ, Schomberg H. 2009. Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals of Environmental society 19, 195-206.

Novak JM, Lima I, Xing B, Gaskin JW, Steiner C, Das KC, Ahmedna M, Rehrah D, Watts DW, Busscher WJ, Schomberg H. 2009. Characterization of designer biochar produced at different temperatures and their effects on a loamy sand. Annals of Environmental society 19, 195-206.

Olsen SR. 1954. Phosphorus. Methods of Soil Analysis Part 2: American Society of Agronomy. No. 9. Madison, Wisconsin, USA p. 403-427.

Rhoades JD. 1982. Soluble salts. Methods of soil analysis. Part 2, 167-178.

Shenbagavalli S, Mahimairaja S. 2012. Production and characterization of biochar from different biological wastes. International Journal of Plant, Animal and Environmental Sciences 2, 197-201.

Sohi SP, Krull E, Lopez-Capel E, Bol R. 2010. A review of biochar and its use and function in soil. Advances in Agronomy 105, 47-82.

Soltanpour PN, Workman S. 1979. Modification of NAHCO3, DTPA soil test to omit carbon black. Commun. Soil Science and Plant Analysis 10, 1411-1420.

Steel RG, Torrie JH, Dickey DA. 1997. Principles and procedures of statistics: a biometrical approach 1, 276-282.

Vendrell PF, Zupancic J. 1990. Determination of soil nitrate by transmitration of salicylic acid. Communications in Soil Science and Plant Analysis 21, 1705-1713.

Zhang A, Bian R, Pan G, Cui L, Hussain Q, Li L, Zheng J, Zheng J, Zhang X, Han X, Yu X. 2012. Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emission in a Chinese rice paddy: a field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles. Field Crops Research 127, 153-160.

Zhang A, Bian R, Pan G, Cui L, Hussain Q, Li L, Zheng J, Zheng J, Zhang X, Han X, Yu X. 2012. Effects of biochar amendment on soil quality, crop yield and greenhouse gas emission in a Chinese rice paddy: a field study of 2 consecutive rice growing cycles. Field Crops Research 127, 153-160.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.