Comparative economic analysis between commercial aquaculture and selected mangrove ecosystems along Macajalar Bay, Philippines

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2021
Views (1304)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Comparative economic analysis between commercial aquaculture and selected mangrove ecosystems along Macajalar Bay, Philippines

Florianne T Consolacion, Maria Rizalia Y Teves, Peter D Suson, Wella Tiu-Tatil, Frandel Louis S Dagoc, Ruben F Amparado Jr.
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 19(1), 80-87, July 2021.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2021; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This paper aims to compare the cost and benefit values of commercial aquaculture and mangrove ecosystems situated in three municipalities namely; Laguindingan, Alubijid, and El Salvador, Northern Mindanao, Philippines. Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA) has been used for value determination and comparison of mangrove forests and commercial aquaculture farm. The results revealed that the annual total economic values of the three selected mangrove study areas are estimated to be Php 1,496,345.55 (Laguindingan) Php 1,448,160.19 (Alubijid) and Php 1,444,172.53 (El Salvador per hectare, respectively). The highest value contribution is derived from the direct use value, 90.54 %, 90.40 % & 89.31%, respectively. Findings suggest that all households in all study sites are dependent on the direct benefits provided by mangroves in terms of their fishery products. In Cost-Benefit Analysis (CBA), the results revealed that at 10% discount rate mangrove restoration provides a better outcome as the net present value of mangroves is relatively three times higher than that of the commercial aquaculture project. Moreover, the outcomes at 15% discount rate showed a negative net present value for the aquaculture project (Laguindingan: Php -7,382,064.07, Alubijid: Php -7,357,714.64, El Salvador: Php -7,504,192.52) while the mangroves remained to have a positive net present value. This means that the conversion of mangrove forests into commercial aquaculture is not economically efficient. Mangrove restoration investment draws more equity (better social welfare) for communities than aquaculture as aquaculture development benefits accrue mainly to private operators with much higher incremental social costs than intact mangrove ecosystems.

Acharya G. 2002. Life at the margins: The social, economic and ecological importance of mangroves. Madera y Bosques 8(1),  53-60.

Canoy ME, Quiaoit HA. 2011. Ridge to Reef in the Philippines: A Showcase of Nine Emerging and Merging Initiatives. Xavier University Press, Cagayan de Oro City, pp 9-10. ISBN 978-971-9094-17-3.

Consolacion F. 2018. Economic Valuation of Selected Mangrove Ecosystems along Macajalar Bay, Misamis Oriental, Philippines – Chapter 1 & 2. Mindanao State University-Iligan Institute of Technology. Unpublished Masteral Thesis.

Dierberg FE, Kiattisimkul W. 1996 Issues, impacts, and implications of shrimp aquaculture in Thailand. Environmental Management 20, 649-666.

Dixon J. 2012. Economic Cost – Benefit Analysis (CBA) of Project Environmental Impacts and Mitigation Measures: Implementation Guideline. Inter – American Development Bank Technical Note, No. IDB – TN – 428.

Gunawardena M, Rowan JS. 2005. Economic Valuation of a Mangrove Ecosystem Threatened by Shrimp Aquaculture in Sri Lanka. Journal of Environmental Management 36(4), 535-550.

Janssen R, Padilla JE. 1999. Preservation or conversion: Valuation and evaluation of a mangrove forest in the Philippines. Environmental and Resource Economics 14, 297-331.

Khor M. 1995. Protests over shrimp farms spread throughout India. Third World Resurgence 59, 11-12.

Malik A, Fensholt R, Mertz O. 2015. Economic Valuation of Mangroves for Comparison with Commercial Aquaculture in South Sulawesi, Indonesia. Forests 6(9), 3028-3044.

Narayan T, Foley L, Haskell J, Cooley D, Hyman E. 2017. Cost-Benefit Analysis of Mangrove Restoration for Coastal Protection and an Earthen Dike Alternative in Mozambique. Washington, DC: Climate Economic Analysis Development, Investment, and Resilience (CEADIR) Activity, Crown Agents USA and Abt Associates. Prepared for the U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID).

Nickerson DJ. 1999. Trade-offs of mangrove area development in the Philippines, Ecological Economics 28(2), 279-298.

Ronnback P. 1999. The ecological basis for economic value of seafood production supported by mangrove ecosystems. Ecological Economics 29(2), 235-252.

Sathirathai S. 1998. Economic Valuation of Mangroves and the Roles of Local Communities in the Conservation of Natural Resources: Case Study of Surat Thani, South of Thailand. EEPSEA Research Report rr1998061, Economy and Environment Program for Southeast Asia (EEPSEA), revised Jun 1998.

Tuan T, Tinh Bui. 2013. Cost–benefit analysis of mangrove restoration in Thi Nai Lagoon, Quy Nhon City, Vietnam.

Tuan TH, Xuan MV, Nam D, Navrud S. 2009. Valuing direct use values of wetlands: A case study of Tam Giang – CauHai lagoon wetland in Vietnam. Ocean and Coastal Management 52, 102-112.

United Nations Environment Programme (UNEP). 2011. Economic Analysis of Mangrove Forests: A case study in Gazi Bay, Kenya, UNEP, iii+42 pp.

Yap WG. 2001. Developments in marine and brackishwater fish culture in Southeast Asia. In L. M. B. Garcia (Ed.), Responsible Aquaculture Development in Southeast Asia. Proceedings of the Seminar-Workshop on Aquaculture Development in Southeast Asia organized by the Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center, 12-14 October 1999, Iloilo City, Philippines (pp. 45-66). Tigbauan, Iloilo, Philippines: Aquaculture Department, Southeast Asian Fisheries Development Center.

Related Articles

General characteristics of the mycobiota of vegetable and melon plants cultivated in Azerbaijan

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, A. Kh. Rajabli, E. I. Allahverdiyev, A. G. Eyvazov, S. F. Azadaliyeva, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 139-145, April 2026.

Comparative assessment of plant biomass in the climatic zones of Burkina Faso

Alimata Zorom*, Yélézouomin Stéphane Corentin Somé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 129-138, April 2026.

Ethnomedicinal plant knowledge of the Manobo indigenous people in Agusan del Sur, Philippines

Ferdinand A. Dumalagan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 117-128, April 2026.

Exploitation and threat traits of the Hoplobatrachus occipitalis community, an economically important frog in the Poro region, Northern Côte d’Ivoire

Kien Kouassi Brahiman*, Aka Sesseho Guy Roger, Ndiaye Awa, Kouamelan Essetchi Paul, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 108-116, April 2026.

Species richness and conservation status of ferns (Pteridophyta) in Barangay New Casul, Mutia, Zamboanga del Norte

Jay Anne B. Mejos, Aljun P. Pusod, Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 100-107, April 2026.

Dietary Aloe vera improves growth and hematology in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Fatima Khan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 89-99, April 2026.

Intercropping camphor basil shrubs with selected food crops for ecosystem services in the upper midland agroecological zone of Western Kenya

Reuben K. B. Chumba*, Alex Awiti, Francis Namasaka Muyekho, Vitalis Ogemah, Jacob Omollo, Yosef Kidane Gebrehawariat, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 73-88, April 2026.

Surveillance and detection of African swine fever on abbatoir in different municipalities of third district of Cagayan, Philippines

Maricel F. Campanano, John Michael M. Melad, Mary Ann M. Santos*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 65-72, April 2026.