Microbial content of pasteurized cattle milk at different packaging materials and storage duration

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2018
Views (622)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Microbial content of pasteurized cattle milk at different packaging materials and storage duration

Babylyn P. Canceran
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 13(3), 117-121, September 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Milk is an important source of nutrients to human and animals, but due to its high water activity and nutritional value it serves as an excellent medium for growth of many kind of microorganisms under suitable conditions. This study determined the presence and levels of microbial content of pasteurized cattle milk using three packaging materials: Polyethylene terephthalate (PET), tetra pack and glass and stored at different durations: six (6), twelve (12) and twenty (24) hours. Samples were subjected to microbiological analysis for Aerobic Plate Count at the Department of Science and Technology (DOST), Tuguegarao City. Results showed that PET packaging material produced the least mean microbial load and recorded the most delayed production and growth of microbes at different storage durations. Using ANOVA, analysis further showed that the combined effect of the packaging material and storage duration on the mean microbial load of dairy milk is significant (P>0.01). Results imply that the use of PET packaging material allows dairy milk to be stored for a longer period with the least growth of microorganisms compared to the use of glass and tetra pack packaging materials.

Abdelrahman SMA, AMM, Said Ahmed IEM, El Zubeir OAO, El Owni MKA, Ahmed. 2009. Microbiological and Physicochemical Properties of Raw Milk Used for Processing Pasteurized Milk in Blue Nile Dairy Company (Sudan). Australian Journal of Basic and Applied Sciences 3(4), 3433-3437.

Anderson, Melisa. 2011. “The Microbial Content of Unexpired Pasteurized Milk Selected Supermarkets in a Developing Country” Asian Pac J Trop Biomed. 205-211.

Batool, Syeda Afifa, Kalsoom, Razia, Rauf, Naseem, Tahir SS, Hussain, Fouzia. 2012. Microbial and Physico-Chemical Quality Assessment of the Raw and Pasteurized Milk Supplied In the Locality of Twin City of Pakistan. Internet Journal of Food Safety 14, p.17-22 .

Bertu WJ, Dapar M, Gusi AM, Ngulukun SS, Leo S, Jwander LD. 2010. Prevalence of brucella antibodies in marketed milk in Jos and environs. African Journal of Food Science 4(2), 062-064.

Brock TD, Madigan, Biology of microorganisms MT. 1991. 6th ed. New Jersey: Prentice Hall; 1991. p. 345.

Dey S, Krim MH. 2013. Study on Physicochemical and Microbial Quality of Available Raw, Pasteurized and UHT Milk during Preservation. Int. J. Sci. Invent. Today 2(2), 150-157.

Griffiths, Mansel W. 2010. Improving the Safety and Quality of Milk: Milk Production and Processing. Woodhead Publishing Limited.

Gunasekera TS, Sorensen A, Attfield PV, Sorensen J, Veal DA. 2002. Inducible gene expression by non-culturable bacteria in milk after pasteurization. Appl Environ Microbiol. 2002; 68(4), 1988-1993.

IDFA. 2016. Grade “A” Pasteurized Milk Ordinance, 2015 Revision. Retrieved March 30, 2018.Making a Difference for Dairy.https://www.idfa.org/news-views/headline-news/article/2016/03/31/2015-pmo-and-related-documents-now-available-online.

Koirala, Sushil. 2016. Quality and Safety Assessment ofMmilk Supply Chain: A Case Study. Asian Institute of Technology.

MAK BIOTEk. 2017. “Understanding Milk Adulterstion in India” iOrganic.Retieved Feb 10, 2018.

Mosalagae D, Pfukenyi DM, Matope G. 2011. Milk producer’s awareness of milk-borne zoonoses in selected smallholder and commercial dairy farms of Zimbabwe. Tropical Animal Health and Production 43, 733-739.

Olatunji EA1, Jubril AE1, Okpu EO1, Olafadehan OA1, Ijah UJ2, Njidda AA. “Bacterial Assessment and Quality Analysis of Raw Milk Sold in Gwagwalada Area Council of the Federal Capital Territory (FCT)” Abuja, Nigeria.

Padilla, Nathaly C. 2017. Foodborne Bacteria in Dairy Products: Detection by Molecular Techniques. Departamento de Cienciasanimales. Pontificia Universidad Católica de Chile. https//scielo.conicyt. cl/pdf/ciagr/v44n3/0304-5609-ciagr-44-03-0215.pd.

Sarkar S. 2015. Microbiological Considerations: Pasteurized Milk. International Journal of Dairy Science 10, 206-218.

Related Articles

Design and development of a sustainable chocolate de-bubbling machine to reduce food waste and support biodiversity-friendly cacao processing

John Adrian B. Bangoy, Michelle P. Soriano, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 41-47, October 2025.

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.

Noise pollution in the urban environment and its impact on human health: A review

Israa Radhi Khudhair, Bushra Hameed Rasheed, Rana Ihssan Hamad, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 28-31, October 2025.

Prevalence of Anaplasma marginale and Ehrlichia ruminantium in wild grasscutter’ specific ticks in southern Côte d’Ivoire

Zahouli Faustin Zouh Bi, Alassane Toure, Yatanan Casimir Ble, Yahaya Karamoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 21-27, October 2025.

Impact of social media campaigns on farmers awareness of environmental conservation practices

Preeti Raina, Rahul Kumar Darji, Rahul Mittal, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 1-8, October 2025.

Phytochemical analysis and antioxidant activity of ethanolic leaves extract of Psidium guajava

G. Saranya, K. Durgadevi, V. Ramamurthy, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 57-63, September 2025.

Physicochemical and phytochemical analysis of Glycyrrhiza glabra root extract

J. Ramalakshmi, P. Vinodhiniand, V. Ramamurthy, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 50-56, September 2025.