Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Paper Details

Research Paper 09/10/2025
Views (766)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2025; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Wetlands play significant roles in the environment as filters of water, storehouses of carbon, flood-control zones, and habitat providers of wildlife- and they continue to be degraded. An example is Rugezi Wetland in north Rwanda: this is a Ramsar site that feeds into downstream lakes but was significantly degraded by both agriculture and drainage. This paper examines the progress of recent restoration there with an eye towards biodiversity and the structuring of the food web. A mixed-methods research approach was employed by the research team: systematic field surveys in and after the restoration, metrics of water quality (water nutrient concentrations, dissolved oxygen, turbidity) and maps of the habitats using GIS analysis were developed. They also tallied important figures of biodiversity (species richness, Shannon-Wiener index) and monitored the presence of the species in case of plants, birds, fish, amphibians, and invertebrates. Results show marked improvements post-restoration. The Shannon-Wiener index for wetland vegetation rose from ~1.0 to >2.0, and overall plant species richness increased (e.g. the return of diverse aquatic plants such as Lemna spp. and Vossia spp.). Bird species count climbed from 35 (in 2007) to 85 (in 2023), including recoveries of specialists like the Grey Crowned Crane (Balearica regulorum) and Shoebill (Balaeniceps rex). Fish populations (notably Oreochromis and Barbus spp.) rose from ~15,000 (in 2017) to 22,000 (in 2024), and invertebrate species richness expanded by 72 species. Hydrological and habitat restoration increased the open water area by ~12% and improved water quality: dissolved oxygen rose from ~4.2 to 7.8 mg/L, while nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations fell by ~56% and ~63%, respectively, reducing eutrophication risk. Illegal extraction of wetland resources declined, and over 3,500 community members adopted sustainable activities (beekeeping, ecotourism). The restoration of Rugezi Wetland has markedly enhanced biodiversity and strengthened food web interactions. Increases in diversity indices and higher trophic populations demonstrate recovery of ecological functions. Sustained conservation measures, including protection of habitat, invasive species control, and community engagement, will be essential to maintain these gains.

Davidson NC, Dinesen L, Fennessy S, Finlayson CM, Grillas P, Grobicki A, McInnes RJ, Ruben H, Stroud DA. 2019. A review of the adequacy of reporting to the Ramsar Convention on change in the ecological character of wetlands. Marine and Freshwater Research 71(1), 117–126.

Gaspard N, Ogwal H, Habinshuti JB, Musoni P, Munganyinka JP, Mburu DM, Maniriho F. 2022. Assessment of the impact of environment protection in Rwanda: A case study of Rugezi Marshland. NASS Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.36956/njas.v4i1.464

Hobbs RJ, Harris JA. 2001. Restoration ecology: Repairing the Earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium. Restoration Ecology 9(2), 239–246.

Turner RK, Bergh JCJM, Barendregt A, Straaten J van der, Maltby E. 2000. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: Scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological Economics 35(1), 7–23.

Zedler JB, Kercher S. 2005. Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30, 39–74.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.