Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Paper Details

Research Paper 09/10/2025
Views (472)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2025; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Wetlands play significant roles in the environment as filters of water, storehouses of carbon, flood-control zones, and habitat providers of wildlife- and they continue to be degraded. An example is Rugezi Wetland in north Rwanda: this is a Ramsar site that feeds into downstream lakes but was significantly degraded by both agriculture and drainage. This paper examines the progress of recent restoration there with an eye towards biodiversity and the structuring of the food web. A mixed-methods research approach was employed by the research team: systematic field surveys in and after the restoration, metrics of water quality (water nutrient concentrations, dissolved oxygen, turbidity) and maps of the habitats using GIS analysis were developed. They also tallied important figures of biodiversity (species richness, Shannon-Wiener index) and monitored the presence of the species in case of plants, birds, fish, amphibians, and invertebrates. Results show marked improvements post-restoration. The Shannon-Wiener index for wetland vegetation rose from ~1.0 to >2.0, and overall plant species richness increased (e.g. the return of diverse aquatic plants such as Lemna spp. and Vossia spp.). Bird species count climbed from 35 (in 2007) to 85 (in 2023), including recoveries of specialists like the Grey Crowned Crane (Balearica regulorum) and Shoebill (Balaeniceps rex). Fish populations (notably Oreochromis and Barbus spp.) rose from ~15,000 (in 2017) to 22,000 (in 2024), and invertebrate species richness expanded by 72 species. Hydrological and habitat restoration increased the open water area by ~12% and improved water quality: dissolved oxygen rose from ~4.2 to 7.8 mg/L, while nitrogen and phosphorus concentrations fell by ~56% and ~63%, respectively, reducing eutrophication risk. Illegal extraction of wetland resources declined, and over 3,500 community members adopted sustainable activities (beekeeping, ecotourism). The restoration of Rugezi Wetland has markedly enhanced biodiversity and strengthened food web interactions. Increases in diversity indices and higher trophic populations demonstrate recovery of ecological functions. Sustained conservation measures, including protection of habitat, invasive species control, and community engagement, will be essential to maintain these gains.

Davidson NC, Dinesen L, Fennessy S, Finlayson CM, Grillas P, Grobicki A, McInnes RJ, Ruben H, Stroud DA. 2019. A review of the adequacy of reporting to the Ramsar Convention on change in the ecological character of wetlands. Marine and Freshwater Research 71(1), 117–126.

Gaspard N, Ogwal H, Habinshuti JB, Musoni P, Munganyinka JP, Mburu DM, Maniriho F. 2022. Assessment of the impact of environment protection in Rwanda: A case study of Rugezi Marshland. NASS Journal of Agricultural Sciences 4(1), 49–59. https://doi.org/10.36956/njas.v4i1.464

Hobbs RJ, Harris JA. 2001. Restoration ecology: Repairing the Earth’s ecosystems in the new millennium. Restoration Ecology 9(2), 239–246.

Turner RK, Bergh JCJM, Barendregt A, Straaten J van der, Maltby E. 2000. Ecological-economic analysis of wetlands: Scientific integration for management and policy. Ecological Economics 35(1), 7–23.

Zedler JB, Kercher S. 2005. Wetland resources: Status, trends, ecosystem services, and restorability. Annual Review of Environment and Resources 30, 39–74.

Related Articles

General characteristics of the mycobiota of vegetable and melon plants cultivated in Azerbaijan

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, A. Kh. Rajabli, E. I. Allahverdiyev, A. G. Eyvazov, S. F. Azadaliyeva, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 139-145, April 2026.

Comparative assessment of plant biomass in the climatic zones of Burkina Faso

Alimata Zorom*, Yélézouomin Stéphane Corentin Somé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 129-138, April 2026.

Ethnomedicinal plant knowledge of the Manobo indigenous people in Agusan del Sur, Philippines

Ferdinand A. Dumalagan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 117-128, April 2026.

Exploitation and threat traits of the Hoplobatrachus occipitalis community, an economically important frog in the Poro region, Northern Côte d’Ivoire

Kien Kouassi Brahiman*, Aka Sesseho Guy Roger, Ndiaye Awa, Kouamelan Essetchi Paul, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 108-116, April 2026.

Species richness and conservation status of ferns (Pteridophyta) in Barangay New Casul, Mutia, Zamboanga del Norte

Jay Anne B. Mejos, Aljun P. Pusod, Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 100-107, April 2026.

Dietary Aloe vera improves growth and hematology in Nile tilapia (Oreochromis niloticus)

Fatima Khan*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 89-99, April 2026.

Intercropping camphor basil shrubs with selected food crops for ecosystem services in the upper midland agroecological zone of Western Kenya

Reuben K. B. Chumba*, Alex Awiti, Francis Namasaka Muyekho, Vitalis Ogemah, Jacob Omollo, Yosef Kidane Gebrehawariat, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 73-88, April 2026.

Surveillance and detection of African swine fever on abbatoir in different municipalities of third district of Cagayan, Philippines

Maricel F. Campanano, John Michael M. Melad, Mary Ann M. Santos*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 65-72, April 2026.