Development strategy of social forestry by the forest village community institution in the kayutangi forest management unit

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/07/2018
Views (725)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Development strategy of social forestry by the forest village community institution in the kayutangi forest management unit

Novia Novariani, Hamdani Fauzi, Basir
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 13(1), 93-101, July 2018.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2018; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Social forestry is the answer to poverty alleviation and also to mitigate climate change. Through the HKm (community forest), Village Forest, HTR (community forest plantation) and Partnership schemes, so we will get the implication and the community will gain economic benefits by proposing surrounded forest area to become a Social Forestry area in Rantau Bujur Village and Pakutik Village. The purpose of this research is to describe the implementation of social forestry, identify the role of forest village community institutions in social forestry, and also formulate a strategy of social forestry development in the kayutangi forest management unit. The method that has been used in this study is likert scale, qualitative descriptive analysis and SWOT analysis. This study had an identification of village communities by using 28 respondents and 4 key informants. Implementation of LMDH (Forest Village Community Organization) Asuhan murni is 77.14% and LMDH (Forest Village Community Organization) Sinar baru is only 56.42% because of the lack of information on social forestry and the lack of counseling from the Office/KPH to the community, and also the lack of community experience in organization. .The strategy that was chosen in the Rantau Bujur Village is Strength-Opportunities/SO (Strength-opportunities), which the strengths that we have can be used optimally, while in the Pakutik Village used Weakness-Opportunities /WO (Strength-opportunities), to maximize the opportunity factors to reduce weakness. This study produced each of three social forestry development strategies.

Awang, S. 2010. Politik Kehutanan Masyarakat. Kreasi Wacana, Yogyakarta.

Bappeda Kalsel. 2006. Rencana Pembangunan Jangka Panjang Provinsi Kalimantan Selatan Tahun 2005-2025. Badan Perencanaan Pembangunan Daerah Kalimantan Selatan. Banjarmasin.

BPDAS Barito. 2009. Evaluasi Pelaksanaan Gerakan Rehabilitasi Hutan dan Lahan di Kalimantan Selatan. Balai Pengelolaan DAS Barito, Banjarbaru.

Fauzi H. 2010. Pembangunan Hutan Berbasis Kehutanan Sosial. Karya Putra Darwati, Bandung https://www.pengertianmenurutparaahli.net (Diakses 6 Juni 2017).

Fauzi, H. 2010. Kehutanan masyarakat (1st ed., p. 274). Pustaka Banua. Banjarmasin.

Mardikanto et al. 1996. Penyuluhan Pembangunan Kehutanan. Pusat Penyuluhan Kehutanan Departemen Kehutanan RI dan Fakultas Pertanian UNS. Jakarta.

Rangkuti F. 2005. Analisis SWOT Teknik Membedah Kasus Bisnis Reorientasi Konsep Perencanaan Strategis untuk Menghadapi Abad 21. PT. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta.

Saputra, Mulyana A. 2010. Pengelolaan Hutan Bersama Masyarakat Studi Modal Sosial dan Partisipasi Masyarakat dalam Program Pemberdayaan Masyarakat di Desa Karang Tengah Kecamatan Madang Kabupaten Bogor.Tesis tidak diterbitkan. Fakultas Ilmu Sosial dan Ilmu Politik Universitas Gadjah Mada. Yogyakarta  Sukardayati, (2006). Strategi Perhutanan Sosial.

Related Articles

Diagnosis of soil fertility and market gardening systems in the department of Sinématiali (Lokoli and Pegnankaha), northern Ivory Coast

Siaka Coulibaly*, Krogba Yves Nangah, Kouamé Firmin Konan, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 39-50, February 2026.

Analysis of soil fertility status based on pH, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium parameters across different land locations in south Kalimantan

Hastirullah Fitrah*, Agung Cahyo Legowo, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 34-38, February 2026.

Evaluation of the distribution of Irvingia gabonensis in the peripheral zone of Taï national park (South-West, Ivory Coast)

Ybo Marc Gboazo*, Coulibaly Siendou, Traoré-Ouattara Karidia, Diarrassouba Abdoulaye, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 23-33, February 2026.

Integration of smart irrigation with AI-based disease detection: A field-based agro-technical evaluation for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Mvondo Nganti Dorothée*, Nchange Kouotou Adamou, Mefire Nchouwat Youssouf, Nana Modeste, Lombeko Tomo Obe Victorine, Manga Essouma François, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 12-22, February 2026.

Spatial distribution and pest pressure on key crops in Nyeri county, Kenya using agro-ecological zone -based sampling

M. Muriithi*, J. W. Wakagwa, P. G. Maina, D. Gatahi, A. Njeri , Maina Mwangi, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.

Analysis of the factors influencing the adoption of improved rice seeds on farm resilience to climate change in the Tandjile Province of Chad

Mahamat Mallah Choukou*, Salomon Kelgue, Gauthier Biaou, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(1), 6-18, January 2026.

Phenotypic and molecular screening for resistance in elite cassava clones against cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) in Kenya

Geofrey S. Ombiro, George N. Mose, Elijah M. Ateka, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(6), 1-8, December 2025.