Estimation of soil sodium adsorption ratio without soluble sodium Na+ on sandy clay loam soil, Khartoum, Sudan

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2016
Views (704)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Estimation of soil sodium adsorption ratio without soluble sodium Na+ on sandy clay loam soil, Khartoum, Sudan

Mohammed M. A. Elbashier, Albashir A. S. Ali, Mohammed M. M. Osman, Ayman M. Elameen
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 8(4), 120-124, April 2016.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Prediction of sodium adsorption ratio using available soil properties and simple empirical models have become particularly urgent to reduce the time and cost of some complex soil properties. The aim of this study is to estimate the sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) from soil electrical conductivity (EC), soluble calcium (Ca++) and magnesium (Mg++) to this end, a new equation was modified from soil SAR equation (MSAR). For this purpose, 30 soil samples were collected from the field of experiment, Jabal Awliya, south of Khartoum state, Sudan. Sodium adsorption ratio (SAR) was estimated as a function of soil EC, soluble Ca++ and Mg++ in order to compare the predicted results with measured SAR using laboratory tests. The results show that on saline soil samples, the standard error of mean (SEM) of predicted SAR obtained by MSAR was (0.8029) and the p-value was (0.6433). On non-saline soil samples, the standard error of mean (SEM) of predicted SAR acquired by MSAR was (0.4203) and the p-value was (0.2197). The statistical results indicated that MSAR has a high performance in predicting soil SAR and it can be recommended for both saline soil and non-saline soil samples.

Elbashier MM, Ebrahim MH, Musa AA, Ali AA, Mohammed MA. 2016. Efficiency of Two Models for Prediction of Exchangeable Sodium Percentage from Sodium Adsorption Ratio on Saline and Non Saline Soil. Universal Journal of Agricultural Research 4 (1), 32-36.

Graaff R, Patterson RA. 2001. Explaining the Mysteries of Salinity, Sodicity, SAR and ESP in On-site Practice in Proceedings of On-site ‘01 Conference: Advancing On-site Wastewater Systems, Lanfax Laboratories, Armidale 361- 368.

Kalkhajeh YK, Arshad RR, Amerikhah H, Sami M. 2012. Comparison of multiple linear regressions and artificial intelligence-based modeling techniques for prediction the soil cation exchange capacity of Aridisols and Entisols in a semiarid region. Australian Journal of Agricultural Engineering 3, 39-46.

Keshavarzi A, Sarmadian F. 2012. Mapping of Spatial Distribution of Soil Salinity and Alkalinity in a Semi-arid Region, Annals of Warsaw University of Life Sciences, Land Reclamation 44, 3-14.

Moasheri SA, Foroughifar H. 2013. Estimation of the values of soil absorption ratio using integrated geostatistical and artificial neural network methods. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 5, 2423-2433.

Plant Science Department, South Dakota State University, Agricultural Experiment Station. 2006. Soil Testing and Plant Analysis 76-78.

Rashidi M, Seilsepour M. 2008. Sodium Adsorption Ratio Pedotransfer Function for Calcareous Soils of Varamin Region, International Journal of Agriculture & Biology 10, 715-718.

Richards LA. 1954. Diagnosis and Improvement of Saline and Alkali Soils, Determination of the properties of saline and alkali soils United States Department of Agriculture, Washington DC 26, 72.

Robbins CW. 1993. Coefficients for Estimating SAR from Soil pH and EC Data and Calculating pH from SAR and EC Values in Salinity Models. Arid Soil Research and Rehabilitation 7, 29-38.

Robert F, Ulery A. 2011. An Introduction to Soil Salinity and Sodium Issues in New Mexico, las cruces, circular 656, 1-6.

Sudduth KA,  Drummond ST, Kitchen NR. 2001. Accuracy issues in electromagnetic induction sensing of soil electrical conductivity for precision agriculture. Computers and Electronics in Agriculture 31, 239-264.

Valente DS, Queiroz DM, Pinto FD, Santos NT, Santos FL. 2012. The relationship between apparent soil electrical conductivity and soil properties. Revista Ciencia Agronomica 43(4), 683-690.

Related Articles

Botanical-based strategies for sustainable whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) management and tomato leaf curl virus suppression

P. G. Maina, R. K. Birithia, G. N. Kamotho, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(2), 1-11, August 2025.

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.