Taxonomic account of dung beetles from Gujrat, Punjab (Pakistan)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2015
Views (925)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Taxonomic account of dung beetles from Gujrat, Punjab (Pakistan)

Nadia Noureen, Mubashar Hussain, Muhammad Faheem Malik
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 7(3), 20-26, September 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The study was aimed to explore the diversity, distribution and description of dung beetle fauna in Gujrat, Pakistan in 2014 – 2015. Samples were collected from natural forests, grazing pastures and agricultural areas of district Gujrat during the study period by using appropriate sampling techniques.Total of 349 specimens were collected and identified by using standard keys. The recorded specimens were identified into 4 tribes, 7 genera and 16 species including Gymnopleurus bicallosus, Heliocopris bucephalus, Catharsius pithecius, Catharsius molessus, Catharsius sagax, Catharsius platypus, Catharsius granulatus, Onthophagus gazelle, Onitis philemon, Onitis subopacus, Onitis singhalensis, Onitis castaneous, Onitis excavatus, Tiniocellus spinipes and Oniticellus cinctus of subfamily Scarabaeidae and Aphodius crenatus of subfamily Aphodiinae. It was concluded that Gujrat is a diverse area for dung beetle fauna but there is a need to study the population dynamics of Scarabaeidae at a comprehensive level to evaluate its ecological role.

Andresen E, Levey D. 2004. Effects of dung and seed onsecondary dispersal, seed predation, and seedling establishment of rain forest trees. Oecologica 139, 45–54.

Andresen E. 1999. Seed dispersal by monkeys and the fateof dispersed seeds in a Peruvian rain forest. Biotrop 31, 145–158.

Andresen E. 2002a. Primary seed dispersal by red howler monkeys and the effect of defecation patterns on the fate of dispersedseeds. Biotrop 34, 261–272.

Andresen E. 2002b. Dung beetles in a Central Amazonian rain forest and their ecological role as secondary seed dispersers. Ecol. Entomol. 27, 257– 270.

Arrow GJ. 1931. The Fauna of British India including Ceylon and Burma, Col. Lamella III (Coprinae). Taylor and Francis, London, 428 p.

FAO. 2001. Crop production statistics. (Online) http://www.fao.org

Grimaldi D, Engel MS. 2005. Evolution of the insects. Cambridge University Press. New York, 755 p.

Halffter G, Edmonds WD. 1982. The nesting behavior of dung beetles (Scarabaeinae)- an ecological and evolutive approach, Instituto de Ecologia. Mexico DF, 1–176 p.

Halffter G, Matthews EG. 1966. The natural historyof dung beetles of the subfamily Scarabaeinae (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae). Fol. Entomol. Mexi., 12(14), 1–312.

Hanski I, Cambefort Y. 1991. Dung Beetle Ecology. (eds. I. Hanski & Y. Cambefort). Princeton UniversityPress, New Jersey, 305–329 p.

Horgan FG. 2001. Burial of bovine dung by coprophagous beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae) from horse and cow grazingsites in El Salvador. E J Soil Biol. 37, 103–111.

Jessop L. 1986. Dung Beetles and Chafers, Coleoptera: Scarabaeoidae. 5, Part II. Hand books for the identification of British insects. Royal Entomological Society of London, 53 p.

Miller JC. 1993. Insect natural history, multi-species interactions and biodiversity in ecosystems. Biodiv. Conserv 2, 233–241.

Nichols E, Spector S, Louzada JNC, Larsen T, AmezquitaS, Favila ME. 2008. Ecological functions and ecosystemservices provided by Scarabaeinae dung beetles. Biol. Conserv., 141:1461– 1474.

Siddiqui H, Ahmed Z, Khatri I. 2014. Distributional Notes and New Records for the Dung Beetles (Coleoptera: Scarabaeidae: Scarabaeinae) of Pakistan. Pak J Zool., 46 (2): 295–307.

Vaz-De-Mello FZ. 2000. Haciaun Proyecto CYTED parael inventario y estimaci´on de la diversid ad Entomol´ogicaenI beroam´erica: PrIBES-2000 (eds. F. Martin-Piera, J.J.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.