Building strategy priority of blood cockle aquaculture development for conservation and welfare in Sub-districtof Central Kupang, West Timor, Indonesia

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/10/2015
Views (343) Download (8)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Building strategy priority of blood cockle aquaculture development for conservation and welfare in Sub-districtof Central Kupang, West Timor, Indonesia

Priyo Santoso, Marsoedi, Maftuch, Edi Susilo
J. Bio. Env. Sci.7( 4), 34-42, October 2015.
Certificate: JBES 2015 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

Blood cockle (Anadara granosa L., 1758) production in Sub-District of Central Kupang, West Timor, Indonesia, is the result of blood cockles catching business on an industrial scale household. Over-fishing of blood cockle has led to a drastic drop in blood cockles and encourage the catching of juvenile blood cockle, thus threatening blood cockle resource conservation and livelihood of fishermen community. This study aims to determine the priority of blood cockle aquaculture development strategy for the conservation and welfare. The research method applied is a survey method with the population is a blood cockle fishermen community. Data collection was used in depth-interview method with a guide questionnaire. Data was analyzed by SWOT–AHP combination (strengths, weaknesses, opportunities and threats combined with analytic hierarchy process). Results of SWOT-AHP combination analysis show that the global value of the strategies, i.e. development of cockle aquaculture blood with a participatory approach (3.856); building partnerships for the development of cockle aquaculture blood (3.712); and development of blood cockle aquaculture business integrated with its fishery business (3.693). This study has determined the priority of blood cockle aquaculture development strategy for the conservation and welfare is development of blood cockle aquaculture business integrated with its fishery business.

VIEWS 13

Armah FA, Yawson DO, Pappoe ANM, Afrifa EKA. 2010.Participation and sustainable management of coastal lagoon ecosystems: the case of the Fosu Lagoon in Ghana. Sustainability 2, 383- 399. http://dx.doi.org/10.3390/su2010383.

Berkes F. 2004. Rethinking community-based conservation. Conservation Biology 18, 621- 630. http://dx.doi.org/10.1111/j.1523-1739.2004.00077.x.

Chifamba E. 2013. Community participation in integrated water resources management in the save catchment, Zimbabwe. Journal of Environmental Science and Water Resources 2, 360-374.

Gimin R, Alyubi A, Susanti V. 2014.Studi reproduksi kerang darah (Anadara granosa) di Teluk Kupang. Research Report. Faculty of Fisheries and Marine, Nusa Cendana University. 96-103.

Lakitan B, Pada D, Sulistyaningrum W, Mongdong M. 2013.Kapasitas absorpsi masyarakat lokal dan upaya difusi teknologi perikanan di Kepulauan Raja Ampat, Papua Barat. Jurnal Teknovasi Indonesia 2, 1-29.

Ministry of Maritime Affairs and Fisheries-Indonesia. 2015. Statistik perikanan tangkap perairan laut. Information System of Statistical Data Dissemination of Marine and Fisheries (SIDATIK). Ministry of Fisheries and Marine, Republic of Indonesia. Accessed in May 26th2015. http://statistik.kkp.go.id.

Murdiyanto B. 2004. Pengelolaan sumber daya perikanan pantai. Jakarta: COFISH Project. 101- 184.

Mussadun A, Fahrudin, Kusumastanto T, Kamal MM. 2011. Analisis persepsi nelayan dalam pengelolaan sumberdaya perikanan berkelanjutan di Taman Nasional Karimunjawa. Jurnal Tata Loka 13, 70-81.

Njaya F. 2007.Governance challenges for the implementation of fisheries co-management. International Journal of the Commons 1, 137-153.

Osuna EE, Aranda A. 2007. Combining SWOT and AHP techniques for strategic planning. Article presented in The International Symposium on the Analytic Hierarchy Process (ISAHP). Viña del Mar, Chile. 1- 8.

Peterson CH, Costa-Pierce BA, Dumbauld BR, Friedman C, Hofmann EE, Kite-Powell HE, Manahan DT, O’beirn F, Paine RT, Thompson P, Whitlatch R. 2010. Ecosystem concepts for sustainable bivalve mariculture. Committee on Best Practices for Cockle Mariculture and the Effects of Commercial Activities in Drakes Estero, Pt. Reyes National Seashore. California National Research Council of the National Academies. The National Academies Press, Washington. 39- 67.

Pieraccini M. 2015. Rethinking participation in environmental decision-making: epistemologies of marine conservation in South-East England. Journal of Environmental Law 27, 45-67. http://dx.doi.org/10.1093/jel/equ035.

Plummer R. 2005. A review of sustainable development implementation through local action from an ecosystem management perspective. Journal of Rural and Tropical Public Health 4, 33-40.

Rangkuti F. 2011. Analisis SWOT teknik membedah kasus bisnis: reorientasi konsep perencanaan strategis untuk menghadapi abad 21. Gramedia Pustaka Utama, Jakarta. 8-30.

Rao GS, Somayajulu KR. 2006. Fishery and stock assessment of the blood cockle Anadara granosa (Linnaeus) from Kakinada Bay. Indian Journal Fisheries 53, 203-209.

Retnowati E. 2011. Nelayan Indonesia dalam pusaran kemiskinan struktural (perspektif sosial, ekonomi dan hukum). Jurnal Perspektif 16, 149-159.

Shofwan M, Khusaini, Badriyah N. 2008. Pengelolaan potensi sumberdaya kelautan sebagai upaya peningkatan pendapatan nelayan (studi kasus community-based management wilayah pesisir di Kabupaten Tuban). Journal of Indonesian Applied Economics 2, 102-112.

Shrestha U. 2011. Community participation in wetland conservation in Nepal. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment 12, 140-147.

Statistics Central Bureau of Kupang Regency. 2014. Kabupaten Kupang dalam Angka 2004-2014. Statistical Central Bureau of Kupang Regency, East Nusa Tenggara, Indonesia.199- 232.

Syahra R. 2012. Penanggulangan kemiskinan pasca bencana erupsi Merapi.Jurnal Masyarakat dan Budaya 14, 1-19.

Tamba IM, Cipta IW. 2011. Analisis partisipasi masyarakat dalam program pengentasan kemiskinan masyarakat pesisir diKarangasem, Bali. Jurnal Agrimeta 1, 1-19.

Wiber  M,  Berkes F,  Charles  A,  Kearney J. 2004. Participatory research supporting community-based fishery. Management. Marine Policy 28, 459-468. http://dx.doi.org/10.1016/j.marpol.2003.10.020.