Relationships among morpho-phenological traits using principal components analysis in safflower

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2014
Views (486)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Relationships among morpho-phenological traits using principal components analysis in safflower

M. Bahmankar, D.A. Nabati, M. Dehdari
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 4(2), 89-93, February 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) is an oilseed crop which is adapted to semi-arid region of the world. The objective of this study was to use statistical method of principal components analysis to evaluate the relationship between morphological, phenological traits and yield performances of 20 different safflower genotypes. Plant characters such as day to initiate flowering (DIF), day to 50% flowering (50% DF), day to maturity (DM), plant height (PH), main head diameter (MHD), heads per plants (HP), seeds per head (SH), 1000-seed weight (SW) and seed yield per Plants (SYP) were main selected measurements for the data analysis. The information derived from principal components analysis could classify these characters into three groups based on the amount of variables among plant characters. These events enable to justify 80% of the all of variability within the genotypes. Number of head per plant, SW, SH, DF as well as DM are putative morphological markers which can be considered as the desirable tools for screening elite safflower genotypes for yield improvement in breeding of safflower.

Ahmadzade AR, Majidie E, Alizade B, Omidi AH. 2010. Study the yield, yield components and morphological traits in the spring safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.) using multivariate statistical approaches. Journal of New Agriculture Science 6, 1-8.

Abd El-Latteif EA. 2012. Evaluation of 25 safflower genotypes for seed and oil yields under arid environment in Upper Egypt. Asian Journal of Crop Science, 1-8.

Esendal E. 2001. Safflower production and research in Turkey. Proceedings of the 5th International safflower Conferrence.Williston North Dakuta and Sidney, Montana USA.

Golkar P, Arzani A, Rezaei AM. 2011. Determining relationships among seed yield, yield components and Morpho-phenological traits using multivariate analyses in safflower (Carthamus tinctorious L.). Annals of Biological Research 2,162-169.

Jaradat AA, Shahid M. 2006. Patterns of phenotypic variation in a germplasm collection of Carthamus tinctorius L. from the Middle East. Genetic Resource Crop Evolution 2,129–140.

Khan MA, Ehbrecht SVW, Maass BL, Becker HC. 2009. Relationships among different geographical groups, agro-morphology, fatty acid composition and RAPD marker diversity in Safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Genetic Resource Crop Evolution 56, 19-30.

Knowles PF. 1969. Centers of plant diversity and conservation of crop germplasm Safflower. Economic Botany 23, 324-329.

Majidi MM, Tavakoli V, Mirlohi A and Sabzalian MR. 2011. Wild safflower species (Carthamus oxyacanthus Bieb.) A possible source of drought tolerance for arid environments. Australian Journal of Crop Science 5, 1055-1063.

Mokhtassi A, Akbar GA, Mirhadi MJ, Zand E and Soufizade S. 2006. Path analysis of the relationships between seed yield and some morphological and phenological traits in safflower (Carthamus tinctorius L.). Euphytica 148,261-268.

Mozzafari K, Asad AA. 2006. Relationships among traits using correlation, principal components and path analysis in safflower mutants sown in irrigated and drought stress condition. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 5,977-983.

Salamati MA, Zeinali H and Yousefi E. 2011. Investigation of genetic variation in Carthamus tinctorius L. genotypes using Agro-Morphological traits. Journal of Research in Agricultural Science 7, 101-108.

Samonte  SO,  Wilson LT and  McClung AM. 1998. Path Analyses of yield and yield-related traits of fifteen diverse rice genotypes. Crop Science 38, 1130– 1136.

Shabana R, Abd El Mohsen AA, Gouda HAH, Hafez HS. 2013. Impact of temperature fluctuation on yield and quality traits of different safflower genotypes. Scientific Research and Review Journal 1, 74-87.

Weiss EA. 2000. Oil seed Crops. 2nd edn. Blackwell Science Ltd, Oxford, UK, 364.

Related Articles

Assessing public awareness and knowledge of drinking water safety in Carmen, Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines

Ronnie L. Besagas, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 80-85, October 2025.

Baseline floristics and above-ground biomass in permanent sample plots across miombo woodlands in different land tenure systems in Hwedza, Zimbabwe

Edwin Nyamugadza, Sara Feresu, Billy Mukamuri, Casey Ryan, Clemence Zimudzi, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 65-79, October 2025.

Adapting to shocks and stressors: Aqua-marine processors approach

Kathlyn A. Mata, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 57-64, October 2025.

Design and development of a sustainable chocolate de-bubbling machine to reduce food waste and support biodiversity-friendly cacao processing

John Adrian B. Bangoy, Michelle P. Soriano, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 41-47, October 2025.

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.

Noise pollution in the urban environment and its impact on human health: A review

Israa Radhi Khudhair, Bushra Hameed Rasheed, Rana Ihssan Hamad, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 28-31, October 2025.

Prevalence of Anaplasma marginale and Ehrlichia ruminantium in wild grasscutter’ specific ticks in southern Côte d’Ivoire

Zahouli Faustin Zouh Bi, Alassane Toure, Yatanan Casimir Ble, Yahaya Karamoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 21-27, October 2025.