The impact of nano Fe-chelate, Fe-EDDHA Non-nano and FeSO4 on the growth and physiological index in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) varieties grown in NFT

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2014
Views (861)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

The impact of nano Fe-chelate, Fe-EDDHA Non-nano and FeSO4 on the growth and physiological index in lettuce (Lactuca sativa L.) varieties grown in NFT

Musa Jalali, Mehri Zargani
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 4(2), 434-442, February 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

It is one of the micronutrients Fe, there is enough for plant growth and chlorophyll formation it is necessary. Element for many physiological processes, including the manufacture of chlorophyll and the biochemical reactions of oxidation and reduction, photosynthesis, respiration and enzyme systems is essential. In this regard, this study examines the impact of Nano Fe-chelate, Fe-EDDHA Non-Nano and FeSO4 on some indices of growth and the amount of chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll, Varieties Ovak Leaf Green, Ovak Leaf Violet, Betarige and Ayserg N.F.T grown lettuce in a factorial randomized complete block design with three replications deals. The results suggest that changes in the performance of all averages and indices physiological treatments studied were significant at the one percent level and the number of traits, there were significant differences. So that the maximum mass of the whole plant and shoot fresh mass Ovak Leaf green respectively 253.33 and 216.28 mg, respectively. Fe fertilizers significant effect on chlorophyll a, b and total chlorophyll “a”. Nano Fe-chelate fertilizer plant than other treatments led to an increase in the amount of chlorophyll “b” and total chlorophyll was. According to the test results to improve the performance of Nano Fe-chelated 9% and Ovak Leaf green varieties grown in NFT system is advisable.

Bron JC, Amblers JE, change RL, Foy CD. 2003. The differential response of plant genotype to micronutrients. 389-418. Inj. J. mortvedt et al. (ed) Micronutrients in agricalture soil science society of America incorporation, Medison, Wisconsin.

Cakmack I. 2002; Plant nutrition research: Priorities to meet human needs for food in sustainable ways. Plant and Soil. 247, 3-24.

Jafarnia S, Daey M, Safaiy M. 2007. Hydroponic growing systems. Publishing Training Green farm Mashhad, Iran. 194.

Koksal I, H-DumanoUlu NT Akta M. 1999. The effects of different amino acid chelate foliar fortilisers on yield, fruit quality, shoot growth and Fe, Zn, Cu, Mn concentration of leaves in Williams pear cultivar (Pyrunus communis L.) Tr. Journal of Agriculture and Forestry. 23, 651-658.

Peyvandi M, Parandeh H, Mirza M. 2010. Comparison of nano Fe-chelate with Fe-chelate on growth parameters and antioxidant enzyme activities basil (Ocimum basilicum). New Journal of Cellular Biotechnology – Molecular, Volume I, Number IV. 11 pages.

Ronaghi A, Chakrol-hosseini M, Karimian N. 2002. Growth and chemical composition of corn as affected by phosphorus and iron. Journal of Science and Technology of Agricultural and Natural Resources 6, 91-102.

Schoen C, De Weerdt M, Hillhorst R, Boender P, Szemes M, Bonats P. 2003. Multiple detection of plant (quarantine) pathogens by micro-arrays: an innovative tool for plant health management. Page 108 in: Abstracts of the 19th International Symposium on virus and virus-like diseases of temperate fruit crops.

Tabatabai  J.  2008.  Mineral  Nutrition  of  Plants. Tabatabai S.J. Tabriz publication. 389.

Taiz L, Zeiger A. 2002. Plant Physiology. Environmental Iranian publishing house (Third Edition), Tehran. 780.

Translation of Naseri A. 2013. Systems hydroponics (growing plants in water, nutrients). Institute of Technology, Department of Mechanical Engineering, the field of water technology. 6.

Vankhadeh S. 2002. Response of sunflower to applied Zn, Fe, P, N. NEs s.zz: 1, 143. 144.

Related Articles

Using chitosan made from modified chitosan (Crab shells) for dye adsorption, equilibrium, kinetic, and response surface methods

M. Priyanga, V. Gomathi Priya, P. Bhuvaneswari, T. Shanmuga Vadivu, S. Viswanathan, G. Annadurai, R. Soranam*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 85-98, February 2026.

Effects of logging regimes on woody species diversity and stand structure in community forests adjacent to the Dja biosphere reserve, Cameroon

Nanga Charnelle Prudence*, Angoni Hyacinthe, Menyene Etoundi Laurent Florent, Ifo Averti Suspense, Nkemnkeng Francoline Jong, Mbolo Marie Marguerite, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 76-84, February 2026.

Analysis of soil physicochemical characteristics and heavy metal concentrations in Lourdes, Alubijid, Misamis Oriental

Prosibeth G. Bacarrisas*, Romeo M. del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 49-58, February 2026.

Tick-borne blood parasites in small ruminants: An epidemiological study of Anaplasma sp. and Babesia sp. in Cagayan, Philippines

Kathlyn B. Cruz*, Jhaysel G. Rumbaoa, Mary Ann M. Santos, Bryan Jerome R. Bassig, John Michael U. Tabil, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 34-48, February 2026.

Diversity, spatial and seasonal distribution of gastropod molluscs in Taï national park (Côte d’Ivoire): Influence of environmental factors

Doue Obin*, Memel Jean-Didié, Kouadio Behegbin Habib Herbert, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 20-33, February 2026.

Assessment of heavy metal levels in spring water of Dansolihon, Cagayan de Oro City

Faith M. Guimary*, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 12-19, February 2026.

Evaluating curriculum alignment, accuracy, and readability of ‘environmental disaster, sanitation, and waste management

Analyn I. Diola*, Priscilla R. Castro, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.