Multi-criteria GIS-based place of Isfahan oil refinery for environmental impact assessment modeling in Iran

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/05/2014
Views (584)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Multi-criteria GIS-based place of Isfahan oil refinery for environmental impact assessment modeling in Iran

Mohammad Rezaie Narimisa, Manouchehr Rezaie Narimisa
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 4(5), 171-182, May 2014.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2014; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) for oil refineries in Iran is a major factor to environmental protection in oil industries. Geographical Information System (GIS) was used as a tool for understanding the effects of oil refineries activities on environmental parameters in case of Isfahan oil refinery as a research plan for other oil refineries in Iran. In this case 1024 maps were provided that overlapped on together for final EIA of Isfahan oil refinery plan. This EIA modeling tried to prepare as a plan for EIA to other parts of oil refinery industries in Iran. The Environmental Risk Assessment (ERA) methodology has been used as an evaluation tool for EIA plan. The reason was to make the correct possible risk points and areas for each phase of oil refinery activities as construction and operation. All parts of this research were based on field studies, laboratory tests, Geographical Information System (GIS) software, put the information on maps and made raster in maps by GIS and finally EIA plan were prepared for Isfahan oil refinery. The most important part of this study was the EIA plan for oil refinery in Iran that can be use in other oil refineries in Iran as a major EIA plan.

Khosravanie, Sh. 2001. A Guidance to Environmental Engineering in Oil Refinery. Nioc Publication.

Monavarie M. 2001. Environmental impact assessment. Department of Environmental Protection.

Park J H, Seo K. 2006. A knowledge-based approximate life cycle assessment system for evaluating environmental impacts of product design alternatives in a collaborative design environment, Journal of Advanced Engineering Informatics 20, 147–154.

Price JM, Johnson WR, Marshall CF, JI Z, Rainey GB. 2003. Overview of the Oil Spill Risk Analysis (OSRA) Model for Environmental Impact Assessment. Journal of Spill Science & Technology Bulletin 8(5-6), 529–533.

Pun K, Hui I, Lewis WG, Lau HCW. 2003. A multiple-criteria environmental impact assessment for the plastic injection molding process: a methodology. Journal of Cleaner Production 11, 41– 49.

Ramanathan R. 2001. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 63, 27–35.

Ramos TB, Cecı´lio T, Melo J. 2008. Environmental Impact Assessment in higher education and training in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 639-645.

Ramanathan R. 2001. A note on the use of the analytic hierarchy process for environmental impact assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 63, 27–35.

Ramos TB, Cecı´lio T, Melo J. 2008. Environmental Impact Assessment in higher education and training in Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production 16, 639-645.

Ruddy TF, Hilty LM, 2008. Impact assessment and policy learning in the European Commission. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 2, 90– 105.

Richardson T. 2005. Environmental assessment and planning theory: four short stories about power, multiple rationality, and ethics. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 341– 365.

Rodrigues GS, Rodrigues IA, Buschinelli CCDA, Barros ID. 2010. Integrated farm sustainability assessment for the environmental management of rural activities. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 30, 229– 239.

Sandham LA, Retief FP. 2010. The contribution of Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) to decision making for biological pest control in South Africa – The case of Lantana camara. Journal of Biological Control, Available online.

Sanchez-Trian E, Ortolano L. 2001. Feature article Organizational learning and environmental impact assessment at Colombia’s Cauca Valley Corporation. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 21, 223-239.

Sankoh OA. 1996a. An evaluation of the analysis of ecological risks method in environmental impact assessment. Journal Of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 16, 183-188.

Sankoh OA. 1996b. Making Environmental Impact Assessment Convincible to Developing Countries. Journal of Environmental Management 47, 185–189.

Say NP, Yucel M, Yılmazer M. 2007. A computer-based system for environmental impact assessment (EIA) applications to energy power stations in Turkey: C- EDINFO. Journal of Energy Policy 35, 6395–6401.

Schetke S, Haase D. 2008. Multi-criteria assessment of socio-environmental aspects in shrinking cities: Experiences from eastern Germany. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28, 483–503.

Schultink G. 2000. Critical environmental indicators: performance indices and assessment models for sustainable rural development planning. Journal of Ecological Modelling 130, 47–58.

Senthil KD, Ong SK, Nee AYC, Tan RBH. 2003. A proposed tool to integrate environmental and economical assessments of products. Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23, 51–72.

Sinclair AJ, Sims L, Spaling. 2009. Community-based approaches to strategic environmental assessment: Lessons from Costa Rica. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 29, 147– 156.

Singh A, Lou HH, Yaws CL, Hopper JR, Pike RW. 2007. Environmental impact assessment of different design schemes of an industrial ecosystem. Journal of Resources, Conservation and Recycling 51, 294–313.

Slotterback CS. 2008. Evaluating the implementation of environmental review mitigation in local planning and development processes. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 28, 546–561.

Snell T, Cowell R. 2006. Scoping in environmental impact assessment: Balancing precaution and efficiency. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26, 359– 376.

Tzoumis K. 2007. Comparing the quality of draft environmental impact statements by agencies in the United States since 1998 to 2004. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 27, 26– 40.

Tzoumis K, Finegold L. 2000. Feature article looking at the quality of draft environmental impact statements over time in the United States: Have ratings improved? Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 20, 557–578.

Uihlein A, Schebek L. 2009. Environmental impacts of a lignocelluloses feedstock biorefinery system: An assessment. Journal of Biomass and Bioenergy 33, 793-802.

Underwood AJ, Chapman. 2003. Power, precaution, Type II error and sampling design in assessment of environmental impacts. Journal of Experimental Marine Biology and Ecology 296, 49– 70.

Vanclay F. 2006. Principles for social impact assessment: A critical comparison between the international and US documents. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 26, 3 – 14.

Viikari LE. 2004. Environmental Impact Assessment and space activities. Journal of Advances in Space Research 34, 2363–2367.

Villarroya A, Puig J. 2009. Ecological compensation and Environmental Impact Assessment in Spain. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review. Available on line.

Vries M, Boer IJM. 2010. Comparing environmental impacts for livestock products: A review of life cycle assessments. Journal of Livestock Science 128, 1–11.

Wang Y, Morgan KR, Cashmore M. 2003. Environmental impact assessment of projects in the People’s Republic of China: new law, old problems. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 23, 543–579.

Wang Y, Yang J, Xu D. 2006. Decision Support Environmental impact assessment using the evidential reasoning approach. European Journal of Operational Research 174, 885–1913.

Wegner A, Moore SA, Bailey J. 2005. Consideration of biodiversity in environmental impact assessment in Western Australia: practitioner perceptions. Journal of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 25, 143–162.

Werf H, Kanyarushoki C, Corson SM. 2009. An operational method for the evaluation of resource use and environmental impacts of dairy farms by life cycle assessment. Journal of Environmental Management 90, 3643–3652.

Wiedmann T, Lenzen M, Turner K, Barrett J. 2007. Examining the global environmental impact of regional consumption activities — Part 2: Review of input–output models for the assessment of environmental impacts embodied in trade. Journal of Ecological Economics 61, 1 5 – 2 6.

Wilson L. 1998. A practical method for environmental impact assessment audits. Journal Of Environmental Impact Assessment Review 18, 59-71.

Xue X, Hong H, Charles AT. 2004. Cumulative environmental impacts and integrated coastal management: the case of Xiamen, China. Journal of Environmental Management 71, 271–283.

Related Articles

Agroforestry in woody-encroached Sub-Saharan savannas: Transforming ecological challenges into sustainable opportunities

Yao Anicet Gervais Kouamé, Pabo Quévin Oula, Kouamé Fulgence Koffi, Ollo Sib, Adama Bakayoko, Karidia Traoré, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 10-22, September 2025.

Extreme rainfall variability and trends in the district of Ouedeme, municipality of Glazoue (Benin)

Koumassi Dègla Hervé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(3), 1-9, September 2025.

Heterosis breeding, general and specific combining ability and stability studies in pearl millet: Current trends

Ram Avtar, Krishan Pal, Kavita Rani, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 117-124, August 2025.

Combining ability, heterosis and stability for yield and fibre quality traits in cotton: Breeding approaches and future prospects

Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Krishan Pal, R. P. Saharan, Ram Avtar, Mahendra Kumar Yadav, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 109-116, August 2025.

Bridging the COPD awareness gap in marginalized populations: Findings from a multicentre study in Khalilabad, Sant Kabir Nagar, Uttar Pradesh, India

Anupam Pati Tripathi, Jigyasa Pandey, Sakshi Singh, Smita Pathak, Dinesh Chaudhary, Alfiya Mashii, Farheen Fatima, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 97-108, August 2025.

Antioxidant and anti-inflammatory activity of Pleurotus citrinopileatus Singer and Pleurotus sajor-caju (Fr.) Singer

P. Maheswari, P. Madhanraj, V. Ambikapathy, P. Prakash, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 90-96, August 2025.

Mangrove abundance, diversity, and productivity in effluent-rich estuarine portion of Butuanon River, Mandaue City, Cebu

John Michael B. Genterolizo, Miguelito A. Ruelan, Laarlyn N. Abalos, Kathleen Kay M. Buendia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 77-89, August 2025.

Cytogenetic and pathological investigations in maize × teosinte hybrids: Chromosome behaviour, spore identification, and inheritance of maydis leaf blight resistance

Krishan Pal, Ravi Kishan Soni, Devraj, Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Ram Avtar, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 70-76, August 2025.