Combining ability, heterosis and stability for yield and fibre quality traits in cotton: Breeding approaches and future prospects

Paper Details

Review Paper 16/08/2025
Views (1251)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Combining ability, heterosis and stability for yield and fibre quality traits in cotton: Breeding approaches and future prospects

Rohit Kumar Tiwari, Krishan Pal, R. P. Saharan, Ram Avtar, Mahendra Kumar Yadav
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(2), 109-116, August 2025.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2025; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Cotton breeding has progressed significantly with the integration of conventional and molecular approaches aimed at enhancing yield, fiber quality, and adaptability to biotic and abiotic stresses. In order to create superior cotton hybrids, heterosis, or hybrid vigor, is essential. Both intraspecific and interspecific crossings exhibit notable improvements in component characteristics and seed cotton production.  Finding prospective parental lines and cross combinations requires evaluating both general combining ability (GCA) and specialized combining ability (SCA).  While SCA denotes non-additive gene effects, namely dominance and epistasis, which contribute to heterotic performance in particular crossings, GCA represents additive gene effects, which are frequently associated with the accumulation of advantageous alleles across generations. Heterosis exploitation is widely used in cotton hybrid breeding projects to evaluate GCA and SCA through top-cross, line × tester, and systematic diallel studies. The accuracy of detecting high GCA parents and better SCA hybrids has increased because to developments in genomic selection, marker-assisted selection, and biotechnological treatments.  In order to maximize heterosis expression, increase genetic variety, and maintain production in the face of climatic unpredictability, future opportunities lay in combining genomic methods with traditional breeding.  The next stage of cotton enhancement may be fueled by a smart mix of utilizing molecular breakthroughs, optimizing combining ability, and taking use of heterosis.

Basu AK, Paroda RS. 1995. Hybrid cotton in India: A success story. Asia-Pacific Association of Agricultural Research Institutions, FAO Regional Office for Asia & the Pacific, Bangkok, 38.

Giri RK, Verma SK, Yadav JP. 2021. Study of heterosis, combining ability and parental diversity for seed cotton yield and contributing traits using diallel data in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Indian Journal of Agricultural Research 55(5), 556–562.

Gnanasekaran J, Padmavathi S. 2017. Studies on heterosis and combining ability in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.). Plant Archives 17(1), 594–596.

Keerthivarman K, Mahalingam L, Premalatha N, Boopathi NM, Senguttuvan K, Manivannan A. 2022. Combining ability and heterosis studies in cotton (Gossypium hirsutum L.) for yield and fibre quality traits. Electronic Journal of Plant Breeding 13(2), 697–704.

Kempthorne O. 1957. An introduction to genetic statistics. John Wiley and Sons Inc., New York; Chapman and Hall Ltd., London, 468–470.

Khan MA, Iqbal Z, Ahmad S. 2021. Advances in hybrid cotton breeding: Global perspectives and future strategies. Plant Breeding Reviews 45, 113–145.

Khan Z, Khan SH, Ahmed A. 2023. Genome editing in cotton: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cotton Research 6, 3.

Liu Y, Zhang L, Huang J. 2022. Sustainable cotton production: The role of hybrid cotton in reducing environmental impact. Agricultural Sustainability 5(3), 180–192.

Majeed M, Rana IA, Mubarik MS. 2021. Heat stress in cotton: A review on predicted and unpredicted growth-yield anomalies and mitigating breeding strategies. Agronomy 11(9), 1825.

Manivannan A. 2024. Combining ability studies in desi cotton (Gossypium arboreum L.) genotypes. Journal of Cotton Research 37(7), 2–11.

Nimbalkar RD, Jadhav AC, Mehetre SS. 2004. Combining ability studies in cotton (G. arboreum and G. herbaceum). Journal of Cotton Research and Development 18, 50–55.

Patel KG, Patel RB, Patel MI, Kumar V. 2009. Studies on heterosis and combining ability through introgression in diploid cotton. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 23, 23–26.

Patel NA, Patel BN, Bhatt JP, Patel JA. 2012. Heterosis and combining ability for seed cotton yield and component traits in inter-specific cotton hybrids (Gossypium hirsutum L. × Gossypium barbadense L.). Madras Agricultural Journal 99(10–12), 649–656.

Patel R, Sharma V, Singh P. 2022. Breeding strategies for developing drought tolerant cotton varieties: Challenges and opportunities. Journal of Cotton Research and Development 36(4), 195–202.

Patil SS, Maga NMR, Pawar VY. 2014. Heterosis and combining ability for yield and its components in desi cotton (Gossypium arboreum L.). Journal of Cotton Research and Development 28(2), 211–213.

Rasheed Z, Anwar MR, Hanif K, Adrees A, Karim WA, Amjad K, Hassan A, Mazhar HSU, Tipu ALK, Khan TM. 2023. Evaluating combining abilities and heterotic effects for enhanced cotton yield. Biological and Clinical Sciences Research Journal, 384.

Shull GH. 1914. Duplicate gene for capsule in Bursa bursa-pastoris of heterosis. Iowa State College.

Shull GH. 1952. Beginnings of the heterosis concept. In: Heterosis. Iowa State College Press, Ames, 14–48.

Soni RK, Shekhawat SS, Kumar M. 2018. Character association studies in cowpea [Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp.] for green fodder yield and related traits. Indian Research Journal of Genetics and Biotechnology 10(3), 74–83.

Sorour FA, Abdel-Aty MS, Yehia WMB, Kotb HMK. 2013. Heterosis and combining ability in some cotton crosses in two different environments: Yield and yield component traits. Journal of Plant Production, Mansoura University 4(11), 1707–1723.

Sprague GF, Tatum LA. 1942. General versus specific combining ability in single crosses of corn. Journal of the American Society of Agronomy 34, 923.

Subhan M, Qasim M, Ahmad R. 2003. Diallel analysis for estimating combining ability of quantitatively inherited traits in cotton. Asian Journal of Plant Sciences 2(11), 853–857.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.