Socio-economical effects of land consolidation in North of Iran (Case study: farms of Masal County)

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2013
Views (907)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Socio-economical effects of land consolidation in North of Iran (Case study: farms of Masal County)

G. Moradi, A. R. Eslami, S. Firouzi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 3(2), 61-67, February 2013.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2013; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

One of the important issues that come up in recent decades has been the fragmentation of agricultural land and frequency of plots. Fragmentation of plots and being small is one of the challenges and major obstacles in the way of increasing production and ultimately the development of agriculture. In recent years, agricultural production has not been commensurate with the growth of population. On the other hand, small size of agricultural units and their fragmentation had been created some limitations in agricultural production. Limitations such as to equip and prepare the production surface, infrastructure performance and utilization of machines, increasing the quantity and quality of products and increase the efficiency in various fields. Farmlands consolidation means integrating or coordinating all agricultural activities such as land preparation, seeds preparation, fertilizers, pesticides and farm machinery, maintenance and use them correctly, proper farm management and marketing of agricultural products, so that we can lead cultivation and crops type in accordance with the needs of the community while raising power of production. This study used a descriptive – analytical method to investigate the consolidation agricultural land plan in the Masal city and the results show that dispersion of plots and being small is one of the challenges and major obstacles in the way of increasing production and ultimately the development of agriculture. To determine the factors affecting the adoption of land consolidation by rice farmers, the logit regression model was used.

Agele S. 2011. Biotic and Abiotic Constraints to Revegetation and Establishment of Functional Ecosystem in Degraded Lands in a Tropical Environment. International Journal of Forest, Soil And Erosion (IJFSE), 1(1), 5-10.

Ahukaemere C, Ndukwu B, Agim L. 2012. Soil Quality and Soil Degradation as Influenced by Agricultural Land Use Types in the Humid Environment. International Journal of Forest, Soil and Erosion (IJFSE), 2(4), 175-179.

Backman M. (2001). Land Consolidation in Sweden,  Lecture  at  the  National  Land  Survey  in Helsinki.

Crecentea R , Alvareza C, Frab U. 2002. Economic, Social and Environmental Impact of Land Consolidation in Galicia, Land Use Policy, 19(2), 135–147.

Ebrahimi MS, Kalantri Kh, Asadi A. 2012. Factor Analysis of Paddy-Field Consolidation: Case Study of Iran. Sustainable Agriculture Research; Vol. 1(2), 108-114.

Eftekhari  A,  Rokno-Aldin.  2006.  Agricultural Development (Concepts, Principles, Research Methods, Planning in the Agricultural Land Consolidation) SAMT Publication: Tehran. P.345.

Gajendra S Niroula, Gopal B Thapa. 2005. Impact and Causes of Land Fragmentation ,and Lessons Learned From Land Consolidation In South Asia, Land Use Policy, 22(4), 358–372.

Obrie AS. 1991. Migration, Urbanization and Development, Translation of Guidance culture, Institute of Labour and Social Security, First Publication, Tehran. p. 215.

Pietro O, Marson D. 1991. Different approaches in rural development, No.4, Research and Rural Issues, Ministry of Jihad, First Edition, Tehran.

Sarker RA, Quaddus MA. 2002. Modeling a Nationwide Crop Planning Problem Using a Multiple Criteria Decision Making Tool, Computers & Industrial Engineering, 42(2–4), 541–553.

Singh J, Dhillon SS. 1995. Agricultural Geography, Translated by: Siavosh Dehghanian et al., Mashhad, Publications Ferdowsi University of Mashhad. P. 288.

Todaro M. 1985. Economic Development in the Third World. Translated by Gholamali Farjadi, Ministry of Planning and Budget, Vol.1, First Publication, Tehran.

Related Articles

Value chain analysis and business model development of the Rizal mango growers agriculture cooperative

Macluven T. Gonzales, Diana O. Lim*, Karen Joy A. Abalos, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 186-198, July 2026.

Susceptibility of Culex quinquefasciatus to insecticides in the industrial areas of Koumassi, Vridi, and Yopougon in Abidjan, Ivory Coast, during the rainy season

Gahapie Urbain Silue*, Koffi Ladji Yao, N’tamon Romeo N’tamon, Edmond Charles Basseli, Genevieve Lydie Acapovi-Yao, Yao Lucien Konan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 175-185, July 2026.

Optimization of maltodextrin as a bulking agent in mango (Mangifera indica) fruit bar: Physical, sensory, and nutritional evaluation

Macluven T. Gonzales*, Diana O. Lim, Jocelyn D. Tuliao, Hitler C. Dangatan, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 150-163, July 2026.

An assessment of the effect of wind flow on the indoor thermal condition of some buildings in Benin City, Nigeria

Tashok, Yusuf Haruna*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 136-149, July 2026.

Analyzing roadside tree diversity reveals dominance, shadow diversity, and management archetypes: The case of Tagbilaran City, Bohol, Philippines

Johnuel Tac-on, Jesie Diola, Noel T. Lomosbog, Jairyl B. Oclarit, MA. Aneli A. Lanzaderas*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 122-135, July 2026.

Floristic diversity of major river systems in Zamboanga del Norte

Ma. Dulce C. Guillena*, Maria Rio A. Naguit, Ethel T. Cata-al, Tessie G. Pulido, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 29(1), 101-111, July 2026.