How are our protected areas doing? management effectiveness of three protected areas in Ghana

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/06/2012
Views (793)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

How are our protected areas doing? management effectiveness of three protected areas in Ghana

Benjamin Yeboah Ofori, Daniel Korley Attuquayefio
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 2(6), 1-11, June 2012.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2012; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The management effectiveness of three protected areas, Mole National Park (MNP) in the Northern Region, and the Shai Hills Resource Reserve (SHRR) and the Densu Delta Ramsar Site (DDRS) both in the Greater-Accra Region of Ghana, were assessed. Park managers, wildlife officers and guards, and conservation practitioners were interviewed using the World Bank-WWF Alliance Management Effectiveness Tracking Tool Questionnaire (METT). Management effectiveness varied across the three protected areas (PAs). In general, the PAs were effective in conserving biodiversity, and ecological and cultural values. However, their contribution to improving standards of living of fringe communities remained a major management challenge, even though livelihood support programme existed in some communities surrounding the MNP and SHRR. A total of 21 threat factors were recorded for the PAs, with five of them, poaching, livestock grazing, bushfire, erosion and flooding being common to all the three PAs. The most severe and persistent threats varied from site to site. In all the PAs, management were constrained by inadequate funding, trained field personnel, and equipment and facilities. Addressing these constraints, therefore, may enhance the management effectiveness of these PAs.

Allotey J. 2007. Status of biodiversity and impact assessment in Ghana. Biodiversity and IA. Doc/ED’sDoc/26/04/2007.

Aryeetey E, Carret J, Penrose JP. 2005. Ghana: Natural resources management and growth sustainability draft. Economic sector work, World Bank.

Bruner AG, Gullison RE, Rice RE, da Fonseca, GAB. 2001. Effectiveness of parks in protecting tropical biodiversity. Science, 291, 125-127.

Chape S, Harrison J, Spalding M, Lysenko I. 2005. Measuring the extent and effectiveness of protected areas as an indicator for meeting global biodiversity targets. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B, 360, 443– 455.

Ervin J. 2003. Rapid assessment of protected area management effectiveness in four countries. BioScience, 53(9), 833-841.

Earth Trends (2003) Available online at http://earthtrends.wri.org.

Ferraro PJ, Pattanayak SK. 2006. Money for nothing? A call for empirical evaluation of biodiversity conservation investment. PloS Biology, 4 (4), 482-488.

Goodman SP. 2003. Assessing management effectiveness and setting priorities in protected areas in KwaZulu-Natal. BioScience, 53 (9), 843-851.

Hockings M. 2003. Systems for assessing the effectiveness of management in protected areas. BioScience, 53 (9), 823-832.

Lu D, Chou Y, Yuan H. 2005. Paradigm shift in the institutional arrangement of protected areas management in Taiwan: A case study of Wu-Wei-Kang Waterfowl Wildlife Refuge in Ilan, Taiwan. Environmental Science and Policy, 8, 418-430.

Mole National Park Management Plan (MNPMP). 1994. Ghana Wildlife Division (Forestry Commission) Accra, Ghana.

Oteng-Yeboah AA. 1999. Development of a Management Plan for the Densu Delta Ramsar Site for Wildlife Division of Forestry Commission, Ministry of Lands and Forestry, Ghana, GET TF 28619 GH.

Phillips A. 2001. Mining  and  Protected  Areas. Mining, Minerals and Sustainable Development No. 62, October, 2001.

Shai Hills Resource Reserve Management Plan (SHRRMP). 1992. Ghana Wildlife Division of the Forestry Commission. Accra, Ghana.

Conservation Success in Protected Areas and Biosphere    Reserves    (CSPABR).    2006. Discussion Paper 01 of the GoBi Research Group, Berlin, June, 2006.

Struhsaker TT, Struhsaker PJ, Siex KS. 2005. Conserving  Africa’s  rain  forest:  problems  and possible solutions. Biological Conservation, 123, 45-54.

Wilson K, Pressey RL, Newton A, Burgman M,Possingham H, Weston C. 2005. Measuring and incorporating vulnerability into conservation planning. Environmental Management, 35 (5), 527-543.

Related Articles

Assessing public awareness and knowledge of drinking water safety in Carmen, Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines

Ronnie L. Besagas, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 80-85, October 2025.

Baseline floristics and above-ground biomass in permanent sample plots across miombo woodlands in different land tenure systems in Hwedza, Zimbabwe

Edwin Nyamugadza, Sara Feresu, Billy Mukamuri, Casey Ryan, Clemence Zimudzi, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 65-79, October 2025.

Adapting to shocks and stressors: Aqua-marine processors approach

Kathlyn A. Mata, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 57-64, October 2025.

Design and development of a sustainable chocolate de-bubbling machine to reduce food waste and support biodiversity-friendly cacao processing

John Adrian B. Bangoy, Michelle P. Soriano, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 41-47, October 2025.

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.

Noise pollution in the urban environment and its impact on human health: A review

Israa Radhi Khudhair, Bushra Hameed Rasheed, Rana Ihssan Hamad, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 28-31, October 2025.

Prevalence of Anaplasma marginale and Ehrlichia ruminantium in wild grasscutter’ specific ticks in southern Côte d’Ivoire

Zahouli Faustin Zouh Bi, Alassane Toure, Yatanan Casimir Ble, Yahaya Karamoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 21-27, October 2025.