Development and testing of mechanical pollinator for bell pepper in controlled environment agriculture

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/09/2019
Views (856)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Development and testing of mechanical pollinator for bell pepper in controlled environment agriculture

Zia-Ul-Haq, Muhammad Rehan Jamil, Yasir Khalil, Muhammad Arslan Anwar, Yasir Mehmood, Muhammad Adnan Islam, Talha Mehmood, Sohail Raza Haidree, Hamza Muneer Asam
Int. J. Biosci. 15(3), 528-532, September 2019.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2019; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Off-season production of sweet pepper (Capsicum annuum L.) can achieve recommended consumption with high profit. The process of transfer of pollen grains from the male anther of a flower to the female stigma is known as pollination process. Usually it requires greenhouses construction. Many crops rely on insect pollination. However, insects are commonly not possible in greenhouses due to their control environment, which is a major pollination problem that can decrease fruit size and yield by directly reducing pollen deposition. To avoid this issue, a handy mechanical pollinator was developed with main components; DC motor, rod, battery (4 volts), cam on DC motor, oscillating device, switch, wires, battery connectors and rubber band at Faculty of Agricultural Engineering and Technology. For testing of machine an experiment was conducted at Institute of Hydroponic Agriculture, PMAS-Arid Agriculture University Rawalpindi in cropping season of 2018-19. It was experimentally manipulated artificial/mechanical pollination and its performance was compared with self-pollination. Data were recorded on diameter of fruits (cm), fruit weight per plant (kg), yield (t/ha). For statistical analysis, Statistix. 8.1 software was used by selecting Complete Randomized Design (CRD) with five repeats. All the parameters measured differed significantly. Artificial pollination increased fruit size, suggesting hypothesis that sufficient pollination increases plant fitness.

Abrol DP. 2013. Pollination biology: biodiversity conservation and agricultural production. New York.

Aliyu L. 2000. The effects of organic and mineral fertilizer on growth, yield and composition of pepper. Biological Agriculture and Horticulture 18, 29-36

Benjamin FE, Winfree R. 2014. Lack of pollinators limits fruit production in commercial blueberry (Vaccinium corymbosum). Environ. Entomol 43, 1574-1583.

Cuellar J, Cooman A, Arjona H. 2001. Increase of the productivity of a greenhouse tomato crop improving the pollination. Agronomia Colombiana 18(3), 39-45.

Eriksson O. 2013. A comparative study of seed number, seed size, seedling size and recruitment in grassland plants. Oikos 88, 494-502.

Hanna HY. 2004. Air blowers are less effective pollinators of greenhouse tomatoes than electric vibrators but cost less to operate. Hort. Technology 14(1), 104-7.

Kelley WT, Boyhan G. 2009. Commercial Pepper Production Handbook. The University of Georgia, Cooperative Extension.

Klein AM. 2009. Nearly rainforest promotes coffee pollination by increasing spatio-temporal stability in bee species richness. Forest Ecology and Management 258, 1838-1845.

Sabir N, Singh B. 2013. Protected cultivation of vegetables in global arena: A review. Indian Journal of Agricultural Sciences 83(2), 123-35.

Sinsinwar S, Teja K. 2012. Development of a cost effective, energy sustainable hydroponic fodder production device. Agri. Engineering Interns. III, Kharagpur p 335.

Sreedhara DS, Kerutagi MG, Basavaraja H, Kunnal LB, Dodamani MT. 2013. Economics of capsicum production under protected conditions in Northern Karnataka. Karnataka Journal of Agricultural Sciences 26, 217-219.

Tesfaw A. 2013. Benefit-cost analysis of growing pepper: A trial at west Gojjam, near the source of blue Nile. International Journal of Agriculture and Crop Sciences 6, 1203-1214.

Related Articles

Diversity of insects related to maize (Zea mays) production in Ferkéssédougou region, Côte d’Ivoire

Fondio Drissa, Dao Hassane, Soro Lacina*, Sib Ollo, Kouadio Roger Hosphade Kouassi, Soro Senan, Yeboue N’guessan Lucie, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 75-81, June 2026.

Diuretic activity assessment of an aqueous extract of Zanthoxylum gilletii (Rutaceae) stem bark in rats

Akoua Jeanne Kanga*, Essoi Kouametchi Hermann, Françoise Assamala Fossou, Kacou Jules Marius Djetouan, Kouao Augustin Amonkan, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 68-74, June 2026.

Phytochemical investigation and in vitro evaluation of cholinesterase inhibitory and antioxidant properties of Aglaonema hookerianum stems

K. M. Monirul Islam, Simin Shabnam Lopa, Joya Rani, Md. Aslam Sheikh, Md. Golam Sadik*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 60-67, June 2026.

Comparative responses of rice (Oryza sativa L.) to iron toxicity, drought and salinity stress: Morphological, physiological, biochemical and molecular regulation mechanisms

Yaya Touré*, Brahima André Soumahoro, Arthur Martin Affery, Tchoa Koné, Mongomaké Koné, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 37-50, June 2026.

Biocontrol potential of indigenous fungal antagonists from soils naturally suppressive to Fusarium oxysporum f. sp. cubense tropical race 4

Arnel V. Somolostro*, Carolina D. Amper, Mellprie B. Marin, Darwin M. Apistar, Myrna G. Ballentes, Ailyn Q. Daniel, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 27-36, June 2026.

Basal stem rot of oil palm in Africa: Emerging epidemiology, pathogen diversity and future management challenges

Emmanuel Fumbuka Mabula*, Agatha Aloyce, Alfonce Leonard, Pavithravani B. Venkataramana, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 13-26, June 2026.

The role of aberrant glycosylation in autoimmune disease development and progression

Md. Nafis Fuad Prottoy, Sayad Md. Didarul Alam*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(6), 1-12, June 2026.