A comparative analysis of phosphorus fertilizer regimes on seed production of Lablab in East and Central Africa

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2011
Views (818)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

A comparative analysis of phosphorus fertilizer regimes on seed production of Lablab in East and Central Africa

Mugerwa Swidiq, Sara Babiker, Habonayo Glorios, Nijimbere Aloys, Kayiwa Stephen, Zziwa Emmanuel, Njarui Donald
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 1(2), 20-27, December 2011.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2011; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Lablab purpureus is an important forage legume in smallholder crop-livestock systems of East and Central Africa. Seed yields of L. purpureus are generally low owing to limited phosphorus levels in most soils. Amendment of soil with phosphorus fertilizers is thus critical in enhancing lablab seed production. The objective of this study was to investigate the effect of varying levels of Phosphorus fertilizers on seed yields and the resulting net benefits associated with each level. The paper examines results from three studies conducted in Uganda (treatments: 0, 15, 30, 40, 60, 80 and 100 kgP205 ha-1), Sudan (treatments: 0, 94 and 188 kg SSP/ha) and Burundi (treatments: 0, 20, 40, 60 and 80 kgDAP/ha). Generally, amendment of soil with P enhanced seed yield by 27, 18.4 and 4% in Uganda, Burundi and Sudan respectively. The highest increments in seed yield of 40, 27 and 5.3% were obtained at 30 kgP2O5, 60 kgDAP and 188 kgSSP Uganda, Burundi and Sudan respectively. Results from dominance analysis indicated that treatments 80 and 100 kgha-1 were dominated and their net benefits were lower than that of the control. In Uganda, marginal analysis showed that the marginal rate of return (MRR) from 0 to 15 and 30 kgP2O5 was 500 and 700% respectively, while moving from 15 to 30 kgP2O5 resulted into a MRR of 274%. The study concluded that the rate of 30kg P205ha-1 was the most economically viable rate for seed production in Uganda.

Berg RK, Lynd JQ. 1985. Soil fertility effects on growth, yield, nodulation and nitrogenase activity of Austrian winter pea. J. Plant Nutr. 8, 131—145.

Bolland DA, Riethmuller GP, Siddique HM, Loss SP. 2001. Methods of phosphorus application and row spacing on grain yield of Faba bean (Vicia faba L.) Aust. J. Exp. Agric. 41, 227—234.

Brady CN. 1990. The nature and properties of Soils. Tenth Edition. Collier Macmillan Publishers, London. 621p.

CIMMYT. 1988. From agronomic data to farmer recommendations: An economic training manual. Completely revised edition. Mexico. D.F.

French RJ. 1990. The contribution of pod numbers to field pea (Pisum sativum L.) yields in a short growing season environment. Aust. J. Agric. Res. 41, 853—862.

Kasturikrishna S, Ahlawat PS. 1999. Growth and yield response of pea (Pisum sativum) to moisture stress, phosphorus, sulphur and zinc fertilizers. Indian J. Agron. 44, 588—596.

Maobe SN, Dyek EA, Mureithi SG. 1998. Screening of soil improving herbaceous legumes for inclusion into smallholder farming systems in Kenya. In: Soil fertility research for maize based farming systems in Malawi and Zimbabwe. Soil Fertility Network. S.R.Waddington, H.K.Murwira, J.D.T.Kumwenda, D.Hikwa and F.Tagwira (Editors). Pp 105-112.

Pacovsky RS, Bethlenfalvay GJ, Paul EA. 1986. Comparisons between P-fertilized and mycorrhizal plants. Crop Sci. 26, 151—156.

Scaaffhausen RV. 1963. Economical methods for using the legume (Dolichos lablab) for soil improvement, food and feed. Turialba 13, 172-178.

Yemane AAO, Skjelva˚ g. 2003. Effects of Fertilizer Phosphorus on Yield Traits of Dekoko (Pisum sativum var. abyssinicum) Under Field Conditions. J. Agronomy & Crop Science 189, 14—20.

Related Articles

Diagnosis of soil fertility and market gardening systems in the department of Sinématiali (Lokoli and Pegnankaha), northern Ivory Coast

Siaka Coulibaly*, Krogba Yves Nangah, Kouamé Firmin Konan, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 39-50, February 2026.

Analysis of soil fertility status based on pH, nitrogen, phosphorus, and potassium parameters across different land locations in south Kalimantan

Hastirullah Fitrah*, Agung Cahyo Legowo, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 34-38, February 2026.

Evaluation of the distribution of Irvingia gabonensis in the peripheral zone of Taï national park (South-West, Ivory Coast)

Ybo Marc Gboazo*, Coulibaly Siendou, Traoré-Ouattara Karidia, Diarrassouba Abdoulaye, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 23-33, February 2026.

Integration of smart irrigation with AI-based disease detection: A field-based agro-technical evaluation for tomato (Solanum lycopersicum L.)

Mvondo Nganti Dorothée*, Nchange Kouotou Adamou, Mefire Nchouwat Youssouf, Nana Modeste, Lombeko Tomo Obe Victorine, Manga Essouma François, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 12-22, February 2026.

Spatial distribution and pest pressure on key crops in Nyeri county, Kenya using agro-ecological zone -based sampling

M. Muriithi*, J. W. Wakagwa, P. G. Maina, D. Gatahi, A. Njeri , Maina Mwangi, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(2), 1-11, February 2026.

Analysis of the factors influencing the adoption of improved rice seeds on farm resilience to climate change in the Tandjile Province of Chad

Mahamat Mallah Choukou*, Salomon Kelgue, Gauthier Biaou, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 28(1), 6-18, January 2026.

Phenotypic and molecular screening for resistance in elite cassava clones against cassava brown streak disease (CBSD) in Kenya

Geofrey S. Ombiro, George N. Mose, Elijah M. Ateka, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(6), 1-8, December 2025.