home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Agro-morphological and molecular evaluations of local cowpea varieties (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) at the Saria research station in Burkina Faso

Paper Details

Research Paper 04/04/2025
Views (42) Download (4)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Agro-morphological and molecular evaluations of local cowpea varieties (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp) at the Saria research station in Burkina Faso

Hamadou Sidibe, Fanta Razacswendé Ouedraogo, Boureima Sakande, Wend-Denda Firmin Ilboudo, Pierre Kabore, Pasteur Y. Etienne Bazie et Mahamadou Sawadogo
Int. J. Biosci.26( 4), 68-78, April 2025.
Certificate: IJB 2025 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Burkina FasoLocal varietiesSSR molecular markersVigna unguiculata

Abstract

Local varieties could be a source of genetic variability. For this reason, six varieties were evaluated for agro-morphological and molecular variability. A randomized Fisher’s complement block with three replications was used. Pod pigmentation, seed size, stem habit and hilum color showed a difference in at least one of the 5 varieties. Statistical analysis was highly significant for the 50% flowering date parameter at 54.00±3.00 days after sowing (DAS) and highly significant for the 95% maturity parameter at 81.33±3.17 DAS compared with the control, which were around 43.00±0.00 DAS and 68.67±1.67 DAS. The best pod weights of around 3087.33±498.49 g and 3042.83±338.96 g with seed weights of around 18.00±0.32 g and 19.43±0.31 g were obtained by the Bengringa flat and round brown hilum varieties respectively, while the seed weights of Komcallé were 1733.46±526.54 g and 16.13±0.31 g respectively. 2.02±0.19 t/ha of haylage was obtained by the Bengraga B variety, while Komcallé obtained 1.06±0.33 t/ha. The molecular markers used were unable to discriminate between the varieties.

Cover PDF

Carsky RJ, Vanlauwe B, Lyass EO. 2002. Cowpea rotation as a resource management technology for cereal Based systems in the savannas of west Africa. In Fatokun CA, Tarawali SA, Singh BB, Kormawa PM, Tamo M(eds) Challenge Sustainable Cowpea production. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture: Ibadan, Nigeria ;252-266.

Doumbia IZ, Akromah R, Aibuo JY.2013. Comparative study of cowpea germplasms diversity from Ghana and Mali using morphological characteristics. Journal of Plant Breeding and Genetics 01(03), 139-147.

Gbaguidi A, Assogba P, Dansi M, Yedomonhan H et Dansi A. 2015. Caractérisation agro-morphologique des variétés de niébé cultivées au Bénin. International Journal of Biological and Chemical Sciences 9(2), 1050-1066.

Gonne S, Wirnkar LV et Laminou A. 2013. Characterization of Some Traditional Cowpea Varieties Grown by Farmers in the Soudano-Sahelian Zone of Cameroon. International Journal of Agriculture and Forestry 3(4), 170-177.

Khan A, Bari A, Khan S, Shan et Zada I. 2010. Performance of cowpea genotypes at higher altitude of NWFP. Pakistan Journal of Botany 42(4), 2291-2296.

Makanur Deshpande VK, Vyakaranahal. 2013. Characterisation of cowpea genotype based on quantitative descriptors. Academy journals 8(4), 1183-1188.

Mukhtar FB et Singh BB. 2006. Influence of photoperiod and Gibberellic acid (GA3) on the growth and flowering of cowpea (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp). Journal of food, Agriculture and Environment, 4(2), 201-203.

Nadjiam D, Doyam, AN et Bedingam LD. 2015. Etude de la variabilité agro morphologique de quarante-cinq cultivars locaux de niébé (Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp).de la zone soudanienne du Tchad. Afrique Science : Revue internationale des Sciences Technologiques 11(3), 138-151.

Nkongolo KK. 2003. Genetic characterization of Malawian Cowpea (Vigna Unguiculata (L). Walp.) landraces: diversity and gene flow among accessions. Euphitica 129, 219-228.

Nuhu Y, Mukhtar FB. 2013. Screening of some cowpea genotypes for photosensitivity. Bayero Journal of Pure and Applied Sciences 6(2), 31 – 34.

Ouedraogo JT, Sawadogo M, Tignegre JB, Drabo I, Balma D. 2010. Caractérisation agro morphologique et moléculaire de cultivars locaux de niébé (Vigna unguiculata) du Burkina Faso. Cameroon Journal of Experimental Biology 6(1), 31-40.

Padulosi S, NG NQ. 1997. Origin, taxonomy and morphology of Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. In: SINGH B. B., MOHAN D. R., DASHIELL K. E. et JACKAI L. E. N. (Eds.), Advances in Cowpea Research, IITA. International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Ibadan, Nigeria, 1–12.

Pasquet RS et Baudoin JP. 1997. Le niébé. Vigna unguiculata (L.) Walp. L’amélioration des plantes tropicales. Charrier A., Jacquot M., Hammon S., Nicolas D. (eds.). Cirad-Orstom, Montpellier, 483 – 505.

Stoilova T, Pereira G. 2013. Assessment of the genetic diversity in a germplasm collection of cowpeas (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp) using morphological traits. African journal of agricultural research 8(8), 208-215.

Quin FM. 1997. Introduction. In: Advances in Cowpea Research- Singh, B. B., Mohan Raj, Dashiell, K. E. et Jackai, L. E. N. (eds). 375p.

Taffouo VD, Ndongo DIN JE, Nguelemeni MP, Eyambe YM, Tayou RF, Akoa A. 2008. Effets de la densité de semis sur la croissance, le rendement et les teneurs en composés organiques chez cinq variétés de niébé (Vigna unguiculata (L) Walp). Journal of applied Biosciences, 12, 623-632.

Tarawali SA, Singh BB, Gupta SC, Tabo R, Harris F, NOKOE S, Fernandez-Rivera S Bationo A. MAnyoug VM, Makinde K Odion EC. 2002. Cowpea as a key factor for a new approach to integrated crop- livestock systems research in the dry savannas of West Africa. In challenges and opportunities for enhancing sustainable cowpea production, Fatokun CA, Tarawali SA, Kormawa PM, Tamo M (eds). International Institute of Tropical Agriculture Ibadan, Nigeria, 233-251.

Submit Manuscript