Analysis of agricultural land carrying capacity and food availability using a grid system in the Hulu Sungai Tengah district

Paper Details

Research Paper 05/06/2023
Views (505) Download (45)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Analysis of agricultural land carrying capacity and food availability using a grid system in the Hulu Sungai Tengah district

Muhammad Riswan, Syarifuddin Kadir, Mijani Rahman, Ahmad Jauhari
Int. J. Biosci.22( 6), 35-46, June 2023.
Certificate: IJB 2023 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

An imbalance between the carrying capacity of land and the availability of water and food will have a negative impact and may even result in an environmental disaster if the carrying capacity of the environment is exceeded. For this reason, it is necessary to carry out an analysis of the carrying capacity of agricultural land by measuring food availability using a grid system as input for policies, plans and programs as the basis for preparing sustainable development planning documents. The carrying capacity of agricultural land in Hulu Sungai Tengah Regency in 2021 is 76,739.07 ha, while the availability of agricultural land is 72,708.02 ha, indicating an exceeded status of 5.25%. There are five sub-districts whose agricultural carrying capacity status is exceeded, namely, Barabai, South Batang Alai, North Batang Alai, Batu Benawa and South Labuan Amas Districts. Hulu Sungai Tengah Regency, with an area of 177,077 ha, has an area that has not been exceeded by its food carrying capacity of 94,768.33 ha. The carrying capacity of food with the status of having been exceeded is in Barabai Sub-District because it is the capital of the district with the consequence of the large conversion of agricultural land into settlements and offices, besides having the highest population.

VIEWS 97

Bhaduri B, Bright E, Coleman P, and Urban ML. 2007. LandScan USA: a Hight-Resolution Geospatial and Temporal Modeling Aproach for Population Distribution an Dynamics. GeoJurnal, 69 (1–2), 103–117.

BPS. 2020a. Hulu Sungai Tengah District in Figures.

2020b. South Kalimantan Province in Figures 2020. South Kalimantan BPS.

2020c. Central Hulu Sungai District Statistics 2020.

2022. Hulu Sungai Tengah Regency in Figures 2022.

BPS R. 2010. Grain to Rice Conversion Survey 2018 (SKGB) .2019. Consumption of Staples.

2021. Gross Regional Domestic Product of Hulu Sungai Tengah Regency by Business Field 2017-2021 . BPS Central Hulu Sungai District.

FAO. 1996. World Food Summit 1996: Rome Declaration on World Food Security.

Groffman PM, Baron JS, Blett T, Gold AJ, Goodman I, Gunderson LH, Levinson BM, Palmer MA, Paerl HW, Peterson GD, Poff NLR, Rejeski DW, Reynolds JF, Turner MG, Weathers KC, Wiens J. 2006. Ecological thresholds: The key to successful environmental management or an important concept with no practical application. Ecosystems 9(1), 1–13. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10021-003-0142-z

Hardjasoemantri. 1989. Environmental Management Law (Edition). Gadjah Mada University Press.

Implementing the Water – Energy – Food – Ecosystems Nexus and achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. nd.

Irsan R, Muta’ali L, Sudrajat S. 2018. the Carrying Capacity on Ecosystem Services of Land Use Change At Border Entikong . Geosphere Indonesia, 3(2), 11. https://doi.org/10.19184/geosi.v3i2.7896

KLH R. 2014. Guidelines for Determining the Carrying Capacity and Capacity of the Environment. Ministry of Environment.

MOEF. 2019a. Guidelines for Determining the Carrying Capacity and Accommodation Capacity of the Regional Environment.

KLHK R. 2019b. Guidebook for Determining Regional DDDTLH.

Kusumawardhani NP. 2020. Analysis of Water Carrying Capacity for Regional Planning Development in Malang Regency. Jaur (Journal of Architecture and Urbanism Research) 3(2), 166–174. https://doi.org/10.31289/jaur.v3i2.3331

Karabulut A, Egoh BN, Lanzanova D, Grizzetti B, Bidoglio G, Pagliero L, Bouraoui F, Aloe A, Reynaud A, Maes J, Vandecasteele I, and Mubareka S. 2016. Mapping water provisioning services to support the ecosystem-water-food-energy nexus in the Danube river basin. Ecosystem Services, 17(2011), 278–292. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ecoser.2015.08.002

Khorsandi M, Homayouni S, Van Oel P. 2022. The edge of the petri dish for a nation: Water resources carrying capacity assessment for Iran. Science of the Total Environment 817, 153038. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.scitotenv.2022.153038

Mirajiani. 2021. Environmental Carrying Capacity for Food Availability in Pandeglang Regency, Banten Province . IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 715(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/715/1/012007

Mulawarman A, Paddiyatu NBS, Haupea RA. 2020. Carrying Capacity of Water and Food Availability in Sukamaju District. Journal of Linears, 2(2), 92–99. https://doi.org/10.26618/j-linears.v2i2.3126

Muta’ali L. 2012. Environmental Carrying Capacity for Regional Development Planning. Gadjah Mada UniversityPress.

Nengsih SR. 2015. Development of a High Resolution Population Distribution Model for Indonesian Regions Using a Variety Scale Grid System. Geomatics 21(1), 31–36.

Norvyani DA, Taradini J. 2016. Mapping of Food Supporting Capacity Thresholds in West Bandung Regency Using a Variety Scale Grid System. Geo-Environment Student Challenge 1(1), 1–8.

Permenkes. Number 28 of 2019 concerning Recommended Nutrition Adequacy Rates for

Ramlan M, Soerjani M, Rofiq A, Rozi M. 1987. Environment: Natural Resources and Population in Development (M. Soerjani, A. Rofiq, and M. Rozy, Eds.; 1992 ed.). University of Indonesia (UI-Press).

Riqqi A. 2008. Development of Geographic Mapping based on a Variety Scale Approach for Coastal Area Management. Bandung Institute of Technology.

RPPLH South Kalimantan. 2017. Environmental Protection and Management Plan for South Kalimantan Province.

Salvatore M, Pozzi F, Ataman E, Huddleston B, Bloise M. 2005. Mapping Global Urban and Rural Population Distribution. Environment and Natural Resources Series 24 (FAO).

Shui W, Wu K, Du Y, Yang H. 2022. The trade-offs between supply and demand dynamics of ecosystem services in the bay areas of metropolitan regions: A case study in quanzhou, China. Land, 11 (1). https://doi.org/10.3390/land11010022

Tian P, Li J, Cao L, Pu R, Gong H, Zhang H, Chen H, Yang X. 2021. Assessing matching characteristics and spatial differences between supply and demand of ecosystem services: A case study in Hangzhou, China. Land 10(6). https://doi.org/10.3390/land10060582

Law of the Republic of Indonesia Number 4 of 2011 concerning Geospatial Information. 2011.

Yanti R. 2018 . The Sustainable of Environmental Carrying Capacity to Support on Food Security (Nagari Difficult Water, X Koto Diatas District, Solok, West Sumatra) . IOP Conference Series: Earth and Environmental Science, 197(1). https://doi.org/10.1088/1755-1315/197/1/012030

Zhang S, Hu W, Li M, Guo Z, Wang L, Wu L. 2021. Multiscale research on spatial supply-demand mismatches and synergic strategies of multifunctional cultivated land. Journal of Environmental Management, 299(8), 113605. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jenvman.2021.113605