Aparri townsmen online portal: Sustaining access and improving delivery of key information services
Paper Details
Aparri townsmen online portal: Sustaining access and improving delivery of key information services
Abstract
This study assessed the user acceptability and level of usability of the Aparri Townsmen Online Portal (ATOP)- a locally developed digital platform designed to enhance public access and the delivery of key information services in the Municipality of Aparri, Cagayan. Despite increasing adoption of e-governance systems, many local government portals still face challenges related to usability, reliability, and sustained user engagement. This study addressed this gap by systematically evaluating the ATOP’s performance using the System Usability Scale (SUS) and the ISO 25010 software quality framework to determine user perceptions across usability constructs, including reliability, security, maintainability, and portability. A mixed-methods design was employed involving purposively selected participants who utilized the portal’s core services. Quantitative data were analyzed through descriptive statistics, while qualitative feedback was thematically coded to identify best features and areas needing improvement. Results revealed a composite SUS score of 75.17, corresponding to a “Good” usability rating (Grade B), and strong agreement in usability constructs, particularly portability (mean=3.98) and usability (mean=4.22). However, lower mean ratings were observed for maintainability (mean=3.20) and reliability (mean=3.73), indicating areas requiring enhancement. Qualitative insights highlighted system accessibility, clarity, and responsiveness as key strengths, while users recommended faster loading times, improved design aesthetics, and broader service coverage. In conclusion, the ATOP demonstrated high usability and user acceptability but requires optimization in performance efficiency and technical stability. It is recommended that the system undergo continuous usability testing, periodic maintenance updates, and interface redesign guided by user feedback and ISO 25010 principles to ensure sustained adoption and improved digital service delivery.
Aldrees A, Gračanin D. 2023. UX in e-government services for citizens: A systematic literature review. Journal of User Experience 18(3), 133–169. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3605526.3605529
Amar JC. 2025. Development and evaluation of a technology-based barangay management system. International Journal of Science and Research 14(3), 104–107. https://www.ijsr.net/getabstract.php?paperid=SR25303115701
Bangor A, Kortum P, Miller J. 2009. Determining what individual SUS scores mean: Adding an adjective rating scale. Journal of Usability Studies 4(3), 114–123. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2835587.2835589
Digital.gov. n.d. Usability. https://digital.gov/topics/usability
Fonseca D, García-Peñalvo FJ, Camba JD. 2020. New methods and technologies for enhancing usability and accessibility of educational data. Universal Access in the Information Society. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10209-020-00776-x
Hyzy M, Bond R, Mulvenna M, Bai L, Dix A, Leigh S, Hunt S. 2022. System usability scale benchmarking for digital health apps: Meta-analysis. JMIR Mhealth Uhealth 18(2). https://doi.org/10.2196/37290
ISO. 2023. Systems and software engineering—Systems and software quality requirements and evaluation (SQuaRE) – Product quality model. Switzerland: ISO Copyright Office. https://cdn.standards.iteh.ai/samples/78176/13ff8ea97048443f99318920757df124/ISO-IEC-25010-2023.pdf
Ivanovs S. 2025. Nielsen’s usability heuristics: 10 principles to enhance the user experience. https://www.testdevlab.com/blog/nielsens-usability-heuristics-10-principles
Jornadal ML, Forca AF, Putra GR. 2025. Evaluation of developed alumni information management system (AIMS) using ISO 25010:2015. Jurnal Informatika dan Rekayasa Perangkat Lunak (JATIKA) 6(2). https://doi.org/10.33365/jatika.v6i2.134
Khan Q, Hickie IB, Loblay V, Ekambareshwar M, Zahed IU, Naderbagi A, LaMonica HM. 2025. Psychometric evaluation of the system usability scale in the context of a childrearing app co-designed for low- and middle-income countries. Digit Health. https://doi.org/10.1177/20552076251335413
Krol K. 2024. Retrospective analysis of municipal geoportal usability in the context of the evolution of online data presentation techniques. ISPRS International Journal of Geo-Information 13(9). https://doi.org/10.3390/ijgi13090307
Lnenicka M, Nikiforova A, Wang D, Bernardini F. 2025. UX competitive analysis of smart city open data portals: Usability framework, design recommendations, and a roadmap for sustainable data ecosystems. Telematics and Informatics. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tele.2025.102284
Maqbool B, Herold S. 2024. Potential effectiveness and efficiency issues in usability evaluation within digital health: A systematic literature review. Journal of Systems and Software 208. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jss.2023.111881
Marikyan D, Papagiannidis S. 2025. Unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT): A review. TheoryHub Book. https://open.ncl.ac.uk
Molodtsov F, Nikiforova A. 2024. An integrated usability framework for evaluating open government data portals: Comparative analysis of EU and GCC countries. 5th Annual International Conference on Digital Government Research (DGO 2024), 10. Taipei. https://doi.org/10.1145/3657054.3657159
Nielsen J. 1994. Enhancing the explanatory power of usability heuristics. CHI ’94: Proceedings of the SIGCHI Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, 152–158. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.1145/191666.191729
Nikolopoulou K, Nikolopoulou K, Lavidas K. 2021. Habit, hedonic motivation, performance expectancy and technological pedagogical knowledge affect teachers’ intention to use mobile internet. Computers and Education Open 2. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.caeo.2021.100041
Pribeanu C, Marinescu RD, Iordache DD, Gheorghe-Moisii M. 2010. Exploring the usability of municipal web sites: A comparison based on expert evaluation results from four case studies. Informatica Economica.
Raman A, Don Y. 2013. Preservice teachers’ acceptance of learning management software: An application of the UTAUT2 model. International Education Studies 6(7), 157–167. https://doi.org/10.5539/ies.v6n7p157
Ranganathan PS, Karun RS, Alawadi AM, Khamdamova VS, Rajalakshmi B. 2023. Human-computer interaction: Enhancing user experience in interactive systems. E3S Web of Conferences 399, 04037. https://doi.org/10.1051/e3sconf/202339904037
Sauro J, Lewis JR. 2012. Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/2222513
Sauro J, Lewis JR. 2016. Quantifying the user experience: Practical statistics for user research (2nd edition). ScienceDirect. https://www.sciencedirect.com/book/9780128023082/quantifying-the-user-experience
Shneiderman B, Plaisant C, Cohen M, Jacobs S, Elmqvist N, Diakopoulos N. 2016. Designing the user interface: Strategies for effective human-computer interaction. Pearson. https://dl.acm.org/doi/10.5555/3033040
Sørum H, Andersen KN, Vatrapu RK. 2012. Public websites and human-computer interaction: An empirical study of measurement of website quality and user satisfaction. Behaviour & Information Technology 31(7), 697–706. https://doi.org/10.1080/0144929X.2011.577191
Venkatesh V, Thong JY, Xu X. 2012. Consumer acceptance and use of information technology: Extending the unified theory of acceptance and use of technology (UTAUT2). MIS Quarterly 31(6), 157–178.
Marie Khadija Xynefida P. Ontiveros, Billy S. Javier, Corazon T. Talamayan, Jhunrey C. Ordioso, Estela L. Dirain, 2025. Aparri townsmen online portal: Sustaining access and improving delivery of key information services. J. Biodiv. Environ. Sci., 27(5), 35-50.
Copyright © 2025 by the Authors. This article is an open access article and distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 (CC BY 4.0) license.