Assessment the results of QSPM in opportunities strength for electronically waste of environmental management by SWOT method in Pira Iranian drilling company

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/04/2015
Views (680)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Assessment the results of QSPM in opportunities strength for electronically waste of environmental management by SWOT method in Pira Iranian drilling company

Ali Kazemi, Leila Ebrahimi Ghavam Abadi
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 6(4), 524-532, April 2015.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2015; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Electronic and electrical equipment production growth and development along with their short life has led to production of enormous amount of electronic and electrical waste. The aim of the current research is to evaluate the results of QSPM matrix using SWOT analysis in aggressive strategy to environmentally manage electronic waste of Pira Iranian Drilling Company. Statistical population to answer the questionnaire included all employees (90 people) in staff department. Sample size was determined 73 people through Cochran formula while the random sampling was conducted. The results revealed that the company with the score of 2.35 has weak internal position regarding electronic and electric waste management whereas its score of 2.55 indicates its strong external position. Ultimately, primary strategies were prioritized in 3 categories the most important of which were determined as interacting with relevant organizations in order to repair and donate defective electronic and electrical equipment as well as separating them prior to the final disposal with the score of 8.8 plus using instructions in order to optimize not only collecting but also conserving electronic waste with the score of 8.11.

Ching-Hwa L, Chang-Tang Ch, Kuo-Shuh F, Tien-Chin Ch. 2004. An overview of recycling and treatment of scrap computers. Journal of Hazardous Materials B114, 93-100.

Khetriwal DS, Kraeuchi P, Widmer R. 2009. Producer responsibility for e-waste management: key issues for consideration – Learning from the Swiss experience. Journal of Environmental Management 90(1), 153-156.

Kiddee P, Maidu R, Wong MH. 2013. Electronic waste management approaches: An overview. Waste Management 33(2), 1237-1250.

Neyland D. 2008. Electronic waste: ResIST case study report. James Martin Institute ResIST Working Paper 10 April.

Posada E. 2010. Strategic analysis of alternatives for waste management. Waste Manaement. INTECH Croatia 232.

Srivastava PK, Kulshreshtha K, Mohanty CS, Pushpangadan P, Singh A. 2005. Stakeholder-based SWOT analysis for successful municipal solid waste management in Lucknow, India. Waste Management 25(1), 531-537.

Torretta V, Ragazzi M, Istrate IA, Rada EC. 2013. Management of waste electrical and electronic equipment in two eu countries: a comparison. Waste Management 33(3), 117-122.

Yang J, Lu B, Xu Ch. 2008. WEEE flow and mitigating measures in China. Waste Management 28(2), 1589-1597.

Yla-Mella J, Poikela K, Lehtinen U, Keiski RL, Pongracz E. 2014. Implementation of waste electrical and electronic equipment directive in Finland: evaluation of the collection network and challenges of the effective WEEE management. Resources. Conservation and Recycling 86(2), 38-46.

Yuan H. 2013. A SWOT analysis of successful construction waste management. Journal of Cleaner Production 39(1), 1-8.

Related Articles

Impact of sewage sludge on plant diversity in the Nomayos area, in the central regions of Cameroon

Valerie Njitat Tsama, Yanick Borel Kamga, Valerie Guy Wafo Djumyom, François Victor Nguetsop, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 95-105, October 2025.

An investigation of phytochemical constitutents and pharmacological activities of Strobilanthes andamanensis leaf extract

Deepika, V. Ambikapathy, S. Babu, A. Panneerselvam, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 86-94, October 2025.

Assessing public awareness and knowledge of drinking water safety in Carmen, Cagayan De Oro City, Philippines

Ronnie L. Besagas, Romeo M. Del Rosario, Angelo Mark P. Walag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 80-85, October 2025.

Baseline floristics and above-ground biomass in permanent sample plots across miombo woodlands in different land tenure systems in Hwedza, Zimbabwe

Edwin Nyamugadza, Sara Feresu, Billy Mukamuri, Casey Ryan, Clemence Zimudzi, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 65-79, October 2025.

Adapting to shocks and stressors: Aqua-marine processors approach

Kathlyn A. Mata, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 57-64, October 2025.

Design and development of a sustainable chocolate de-bubbling machine to reduce food waste and support biodiversity-friendly cacao processing

John Adrian B. Bangoy, Michelle P. Soriano, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 41-47, October 2025.

Ecological restoration outcomes in Rwanda’s Rugezi wetland: Biodiversity indices and food web recovery

Concorde Kubwimana, Jean Claude Shimirwa, Pancras Ndokoye, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(4), 32-40, October 2025.