Capability of the different sizes of ginger (Zingiber officinale) rhizome setts in producing plantlets as planting materials

Paper Details

Research Paper 11/05/2024
Views (736)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Capability of the different sizes of ginger (Zingiber officinale) rhizome setts in producing plantlets as planting materials

Junifer Rey E. Tabafunda, Genaro D. Omo
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 24(5), 124-129, May 2024.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2024; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) plants are perennials and the rhizomes have a pungent taste which is very important for flavoring various food products specifically in Asian cuisine. In ginger production, the matured rhizomes are commonly used as planting materials, which contributes to the highest total production cost. Therefore, other kinds of planting materials could be considered, such as using plantlets. The most common method of rapid propagation in many crops is the tissue culture method, usually done in the laboratory. On the other hand, the use of certain plant parts has also the potential for rapid propagation. Moreover, they could be adopted by any farmer because it does not require expensive facilities and special skills, lower cost of production and the propagated plantlets can be directly transplanted in the field due to their quick adaptability to varied climatic conditions. Hence, this study aims to; evaluate the effects of the different sizes of rhizomes on the propagation of plantlets to be used as planting materials, and to determine the most productive size of rhizomes to produce plantlets. The result revealed that the 150g rhizome sett had the highest number of plantlets produced per sett (8.53) and the highest net income from recovered rhizome setts. (PhP 53,590.00) after gathering the plantlets, while the 50g sett has the highest number of plantlets produced per kilogram of rhizome sett with 85.67 plantlets.

Adegbola OD, Olufunmilola AA. 2017. Comparative study of the effect of dry and wet ginger (Zingiber officinale Roscoe) spice on the proximate and microbial safety of soybean beverage. Croatian Journal of Food Science and Technology 9(2), 130 – 135.

Bartley J, Jacobs A. 2000. Effects of drying on flavor compounds in Australian-grown ginger (Zingiber officinale). Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture 80(2), 209-215.

Bhagyalakshmi B, Shanthi N, Singh N. 1994. The yield and quality of ginger produced by micropropagated plants as compared with conventionally propagated plants. Journal of Horticultural Science 69 (4), 645-651. https://doi.org/10. 1080/14620316.1994.11516496

Blay ET, Danquash EY, Anim-Kwapong G. 1998. Influence of set size and spacing on yield and multiplication ratio of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). Ghana Journal of Agriculture and Sciences 31, 175-180.

Flores S, Retana-Cordero M, Fisher PR, Freyre R, Gómez C. 2021. Effect of Photoperiod, Propagative Material, and Production Period on Greenhouse-grown Ginger and Turmeric Plants. HortScience 56(12), 1476–1485. https://doi.org/10.21273/HORTSCI16025-21.

Food and Agriculture Organization. 2021. Ginger production in 2019. Crops/ Regions/World/Production/Quantity (from pick lists)FAOSTAT. FAO, Statistics Division. 2021.

Freyre R, Flores S, Gómez C, Fisher PR. 2019. Evaluation of edible ginger as a greenhouse crop. Acta Horticulturae 1251, 119-124. https://doi.org/10.17660/ActaHortic. 2019.1251.16

Gupta RK, Verma VS. 2011. Quality Planting Material Production through Efficient and Low-Cost Micro Propagation Protocol in Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.). http://www.indianjournals.com/ijor.aspx?target=ijor:vetos&volume=24&issue=1&article=016

Hossain MA, Ishimine Y, Akamine H, Motomura K. 2005. Effects of seed rhizome size on growth and yield of turmeric (Curcuma longa L.). Plant Prod. Sci. 8, 86-94.

Mahender B, Reddy PSS, Sivaram GT, Balakrishna M, Prathap B. 2015. Effect of seed rhizome size and plant spacing on growth, yield and quality of ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) under coconut cropping system. Plant Archives 15, 769-774.

Moghaddasi MS, Kashani HH. 2012. Ginger (Zingiber officinale): A review. Journal of Medicinal Plants Research 6(26), 4255-4258. DOI: 10.5897/JMPR11.787 ISSN 1996-0875

Nair KP. 2019. “Ginger as a Spice and Flavorant”, Turmeric (Curcuma longa L.) and Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) – World’s Invaluable Medicinal Spices, Springer International Publishing. pp. 541–554. DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-29189-1_26

Rahman H, Alam M, Nishi NJ, Islam MS. 2022. Influences of Transplanting Approaches of Propagation on Growth, Yield and Economics of Ginger (Zingiber officinale Rosc.) Cultivation. ISPEC Journal of Agricultural Sciences 6(4), 752-76.

Rhode J, Fogoros S, Zick S, Wahl H, Griffith KA, Huang J, Liu JR. 2007. Ginger inhibits cell growth and modulates angiogenic factors in ovarian cancer cells. BMC Complementary and Alternative Medicine 7, 44. https://doi.org/10.1186/1472-6882-7-44

Sengupta DK, Dasgupta B. 2011. Effect of weight of planting material on growth and yield of ginger (Zinger officinale Rosc.)  in the hilly region of Darjeeling district. Environment and Ecology 29(2), 666-669.

Related Articles

Household socio-agricultural profiles and the adoption of crop protection strategies in human-wildlife conflict contexts: Insights from western Côte d’Ivoire around mount Sangbé National Park

Koffi Kouamé Christophe, Ouffoue Affoué Eugénie Naomie, Gagbé Dalié Sylvestre, Beda Alex, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(5), 91-103, November 2025.

Influence of biosynthesized silver nanoparticles on pollen germination and tube growth in Catharanthus roseus (L.) G. Don

Abhijit Limaye, Shreya Mulay, Jidnyasa Jangale, Rasadnya Joshi, Swapna Sathe, Kishor Bhosale, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(5), 85-90, November 2025.

Genetic diversity of parasitoids and entomopathogenic nematodes of Spodoptera frugiperda Smith, 1797 (Lepidoptera: Noctuidae) in Senegal

Farma Fall Babou, Toffène Diome, Mama Racky Ndiaye, Mbacké Sembene, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(5), 69-84, November 2025.

Environmental and socio-economic impacts of pollution by Eichhornia crassipes (Mart.) Solms in the waters of Dams No. 2 and No. 3 in the city of Ouagadougou, Burkina Faso

Florent Y. Lankoande, Jerome T. Yameogo, Asseta Tabsoba, S. E. I. Bama, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(5), 59-68, November 2025.

Evaluation of grains and haulms production of soybean varieties in production areas with high livestock potentiality in Benin

Assouan Gabriel Bonou, Alain Sèakpo Yaoitcha, Serge Aklinon, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(5), 51-58, November 2025.

Aparri townsmen online portal: Sustaining access and improving delivery of key information services

Marie Khadija Xynefida P. Ontiveros, Billy S. Javier, Corazon T. Talamayan, Jhunrey C. Ordioso, Estela L. Dirain, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(5), 35-50, November 2025.

Assessment of physicochemical properties of various sources of water and their impact on human health

S. Rizwana Begum, T. A. K Mumtaz Begum, Mrs. Nousheen Irfana, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(5), 25-34, November 2025.

Assessment of macroinvertebrate diversity and water quality of the Malaprabha river near Munavalli, Belagavi district, Karnataka state, India

Mr. Shama Shavi, Rajeshwari D. Sanakal, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 27(5), 12-24, November 2025.