home icon user icon
Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNS Pub.
Home My Account
Submit Manuscript
double_slash
breadcumb_bg

Comparative study of egg quality traits in local breeds and commercial lines of chickens

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/02/2017
Views (442) Download (14)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Comparative study of egg quality traits in local breeds and commercial lines of chickens

Ziaul Islam, Sarzamin Khan, Amin Ullah Jan, Zia Ur Rahman Khalil, Fida Muhammad Khan, Muhammad Inam, Asad Sultan
Int. J. Biosci.10( 2), 1-5, February 2017.
Certificate: IJB 2017 [Generate Certificate]
Key: Commercial eggsEgg qualityRural eggs

Abstract

Eggs are highly important food because of their high value of protein and richness of vitamins and minerals. Similarly to other types of food, eggs have become subject of discussions about food safety. Intensive production techniques, in which several chemical additives are used, are put into question by consumers. In this study, village eggs are compared with commercial eggs, which are produced under conditions of intensive agriculture in terms of egg quality characteristics. Rural eggs were collected from four different villages in District Dir Upper, while commercial eggs were collected from four different markets in same District. Significant difference was found in rural and commercial egg in egg quality parameters. Highest egg weight (52.3g) and albumen weight (33.71g) was noted for commercially produced eggs. Similarly, egg to albumin weight ratio was highest (64.40 g) for commercial eggs. Significantly, thicker shell (0.40 cm), higher egg yolk weight (15.47 g) and egg to yolk weight ratio (33.96 g) was recorded for rural eggs. Rural eggs had higher haugh unit (85.52) as compared to commercial eggs (84.71). It is concluded, that eggs produced in rural farming system had high nutritional value as compared to commercially produced eggs.

VIEWS 19
Cover PDF

Ahn DU, Kim SM, Shu H. 1997. Effect of egg size and strain and age of hens on the solids content of chicken eggs. Poultry Science 76, 914-919.

Boltumelo PT. 2005. Influence of limestone particle size in layer diets on shell characteristics at peak production. Erisim: Etd. Uovs. Edu.

Coutts JA, Wilson GC, Fernandez S, Rasales E, Weber G, Hernandez JM. 2006. Optimum Egg Quality – A Practical Approach. 5M Publishing: Shefield UK, p 63.

Hartmann C, Johansson K, Strandberg E, Wilhemson M. 2000. One-generation divergent selection on large and small yolk proportions in a White Leghorn Line. Poultry Science 41, 280-286.

Haugh R. 1937. The Haugh unit of measuring egg quality. US Eggs Poultry Managemen43, 522-555.

Hussein SM, Harms RH, Janky DM. 1993. Effect of age on the yolk to albumen ratio in chicken eggs. Poultry Science 72, 594–597.

Jones DR, Musgrove MMT. 2005. Effects of extended storage on egg quality factors. Journal of Poultry Science 84, 1774-1777.

Kondombo SR, Nianogo AJ, Kwakkel RP, Udo HYM, Slingerland M. 2003. Comparative analysis of village chicken production in to farming systems in Burkina Faso. Tropical Animal Health and Production35, 563-574.

Mertens K, Bamelis F, Kemps B, Kamers B, Verhoelst E, Deketelaere B, Bain M, Decuypere E,  Baerdemaeker JD.  2006. Monitoring of eggshell breakage and eggshell strength in different production chains of consumption eggs. Poultry Science 85, 1670-1677.

Mine Y, Kovacs-Nolan J. 2004. Biologically active hen egg components in human health and disease.Journal of Poultry Science 41, 1-29.

Nau F, Anton M, Nys Y. 2003. Lœuf de poule: une mine de moleculesa activités biologiques. In: Cinquièmes  Journées de la Recherche  Avicole, Tours.

Nys Y, Sauveur B. 2004. The nutritional value of eggs. INRA Production and Animal 17, 385-393.

Silversides FG. 2004. The Haugh unit correction for egg weight is not adequate for comparing eggs from chickens of different lines and ages. Journal of Applied Poultry Research 3, 120-126.

Steel RGD, Torrie JH. 1982. Principle and procedures of Statistics. International Student Edition. Mc Graw Hill. Koga Kusha Ltd. Tokyo Japan.

Suk YO, Park C. 2001. Effect of Breed and Age of Hens on the Yolk to Albumen Ratio in Two Different Genetic Stocks. Poultry Science 80, 855-858.

Tixier-Boichard M, Joffrin C, Gourichon D, Bordas A. 2006. Improvement of yolk percentage by crossbreeding between a commercial brown-Egg layer and a local breed, The fayoumi. In: 8th world congress on genetics applied to livestock production. Belo Horizonte, MG, Brasil.

Tugcu E. 2006. The village imagery created in commercial and integrated chickens produced by Avian Flu. Journal of Milli Folklar Dergis 18, 71-74.

Wang XL, Zheng JX, Ning ZH, Qu LJ, yang N. 2009.Laying performance and egg quality of blue-shelled layers as affected by different housing systems. Poultry Science 88, 1485-1492.

Washburn KW. 1982. Incidence, cause and prevention of egg shell breakage in commercial production. Poultry Science 61, 2005-2012.

Yakubu A, Ogah DM, Barde RE. 2008. Productivity and egg quality characteristics of free range Naked Neck and Normal Feathered Nigerian Indigenous Chickens. International Journal of Poultry Science 7, 579-585.

Yakubu PLM, Mtambo MMA, Minga UM, Gwakisa PS, Mdegela RH, Olsen JE. 2002. Productivity of natural disease resistance potential of free-ranging local chicken ecotypes in Tanzania. Livestock Research for Rural Development.

Zaman MA, Ahmed A, Sutradhar BC. 2005. Study on the egg quality of a breed and three crossbreds at various ages under semi scavenging system of management. Pakistan Journal of Biological Science 28, 211-214.

Submit Manuscript