Comparison of qualitative properties of eggs from hens reared in battery cages and free range system

Paper Details

Research Paper 01/12/2016
Views (645)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Comparison of qualitative properties of eggs from hens reared in battery cages and free range system

Monika Stojanova, Dragoslav Kocevski, Vlado Vukovic, Koco Porcu
Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 9(6), 77-83, December 2016.
Keywords: Cages, Egg, Free range, Hens
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2016; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

The aim of this research was to determine the differences of some quantity properties of eggs from hens reared in two farming methods: battery cages system and free range system of rearing. Total 200 eggs were analyzed or a 100 eggs separately from both ways of hens rearing. The research was done in 2016. The eggshell strength was determined using an automated measuring device and the other parameters (egg mass, yolk color and Haugh units) were determined using the apparatus for automatically determining the internal quality of eggs. The eggs getting from battery cages system of rearing hens are characterized with higher eggshell strength compared to analyzed eggs form free ranged hens, but there is no significantly difference. Values for the mass of whole eggs are inversely with values for the eggshell strength at both methods of hens rearing. For the property yolk color, there is significantly differences between eggs from caged and free ranged laying hens (t170.800 = 6.567; p < 0.05). There is significantly differences between eggs form analyzed systems of hens lying for the parameter Haugh Units, too (t194.786 = 6.767; p < 0.05). The eggs form battery cages rearing hens are characterized with higher eggshell strength, higher values for the yolk color as well as higher Haugh units that mean better overall quality. Simultaneously, controlled way of hens rearing in battery cages systems decreases the risk of getting unsafe eggs.

Anderson KE, Tharrington JB, Curtis PA, Jones T. 2004. Shell characteristics of eggs from historic strains of single comb white leghorn chickens and the relationship off egg shape to shell strength. J. Poult. Sci. 3(1), 17- 18.

Belayavin CG, Wells RG. 1987. Egg quality  current problems and recent advances. Sevenoaks, UK: Butterworths, 69- 72.

Clerici F, Casiraghi E, Hidalgo A, Rossi M. 2006. Evaluation of eggshell quality characteristics in relation to the housing system of laying hens. XII. European Poultry Conference, Verona, Italy, 98- 103 p.

Crosby TN. 1981. Food packaging materials. London: Applied Science Publishers Ltd.

Fellows P, Axel B. 1993. Appropriate food packaging. Geneva: Tool Publications for the ILO, 19- 25.

George JM, Carmen R, Parkhurst P. 1995. Poultry products technology, 3rd edition. Food product press. New York, London: an imprint to the Haworth Press, Inc, 123- 128.

Gleen,WF, Dianne P, Murianna P, Kent E, Travnicek D, Susan S. 2002. International egg pasteurization manual. England: United egg association, 29- 34.

Holland B, Unwin DI, Bus DH. 1989. Milk products and eggs. The composition of foods. Surrey, UK: Unwin Brothers Ltd, 85- 94.

Kocevski D, Nikolova N, Bunevski Gj, Dzabirski V, Vuković V, Porču K. 2015. Ouality of eggs for consumption from different producers in the markets in the Republic of Macedonia. 1: Egg  mass and egg shell strength. Maced. J. Anim. Sci., 5 (2), 63- 68 p.

Moges F, Abera M, Tadelle D. 2010. Assessment of village chicken production system and evaluation of the productive and reproductive performance of local chicken ecotype in Bure district, North West Ethiopia. Afr. J. Agric. Res. 5 (13), 1739- 1748 p.

Nys Y. 2000. Factors contributing to improvement in egg quality. Lucrări Ştiinţifice 52, Seria Zootehnie. INRA, France, 92- 95 p.

Pavlovski Z, Hopic S, Vracar S. 1994. The effect of housing system on interval egg quality traits in small layer flocks. Biotehnologija u stocarstvu, v. 10(5-6), 37- 47 p.

Pavlovski Z, Skrbic Z, Lukic M. 2004. Influence of husbandry system on the internal egg quality traits in small flocks hen layers. Zivinarstvo 39(6-7), p.19- 23.

Prabakaran R. 1998. Commercial chicken production. Chennai, India, P. Saranaya, 41- 47.

Sacharow S, Griffin RC. 1980. Principles of food packaging, 2nd edition. Westport: CT, AVI, 168- 174.

Sim SJ, Nakai S. 1994. Egg uses and processing technologies, new developments. Wallingford, UK, CAB International, 89- 96.

Stadelman WJ, Cotterill OJ. 1995. Egg science and technology, 4th edition. Food product press. New York, London: an imprint to the Haworth Press, Inc, 118- 125.

Related Articles

Botanical-based strategies for sustainable whitefly (Bemisia tabaci) management and tomato leaf curl virus suppression

P. G. Maina, R. K. Birithia, G. N. Kamotho, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(2), 1-11, August 2025.

Intertidal seagrass habitat and its macroinvertebrate assemblages in Baylimango, Dapitan City

MA. Dulce C. Guillena, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 16-26, July 2025.

Impact of moisture pit planting on growth and yield of upland Taro [Colocasia esculenta (L.) Schott]: A climate-smart strategy

J. K. Macharia, T. E. Akuja, D. M. Mushimiyimana, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 8-15, July 2025.

Effects of three essential oils on the phytohormones production against Magnaporthe oryzae B.C. Couch, A rice blast pathogen

Ouattara Souleymane, Sama Hemayoro, Sérémé Abdoulaye, Koita Kadidia, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 27(1), 1-7, July 2025.

Boro rice cultivation practices and adaptive strategies of farmers to flash floods in Sylhet haor basin

Nurunnaher Akter, Md. Rafiqul Islam, Md. Abdul Karim, Md. Giashuddin Miah, Md. Mizanur Rahman, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 7-18, June 2025.

Technology adoption and its impact on environmental and socioeconomic outcomes for vegetable producers in Svay Rieng Province, Cambodia

Hong Chhun, Chun Nimul, Buntong Borarin, Serey Mardy, Sao Vibol, Chan Bunyeth, Tum Saravuth, Ros Vanchey, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(6), 1-6, June 2025.

Effect of pigeon pea (Cajanus cajan) border crop on the control of cotton bollworms

Lovemore Mutaviri, Washington Mubvekeri, Int. J. Agron. & Agric. Res. 26(5), 122-127, May 2025.