Composition and variation of milk from Djallonké goats fed with different diets in Burkina Faso

Paper Details

Research Paper 17/11/2025
Views (123)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Composition and variation of milk from Djallonké goats fed with different diets in Burkina Faso

Alice Gisèle Sidibé-Anago, Vinsoun Millogo, Assouan Gabriel Bonou, Remadji Rufine Djikoldingam, Mariétou Sissao, Michel Kéré, Guy Apollinaire Mensah
Int. J. Biosci. 27(5), 173-181, November 2025.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2025; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

In Burkina Faso, feed availability for animals throughout the year remains a major problem. The study aimed to determine the chemical composition and variation of Djallonké goat milk according to diet. Therefore, Pennisetum pedisellatum Trin silage, maize bran, and groundnut haulm were tested in the diet of twelve goats divided into four (4) groups. Group 1 was fed exclusively on natural rangeland (PN), Group 2 on natural rangeland + 0.197 g of maize bran per goat per day (PNM), Group 3 in a barn + 1.88 g of silage, 0.115 g of groundnut haulm, and 0.099 g of maize bran per goat per day (SPEAM), and Group 4 in a barn with 1.820 g of silage + 0.197 g of maize bran per goat per day (SPEM). Milk density and the dry matter (DM), fat, protein, and lactose content of milk were determined over four fortnights of days, and an analysis of variance was performed in R software with the factors ration and fortnight. Milk chemical composition did not vary according to the ration. SPEAM goats had a lower fat content in the third fortnight (3.53%) than in the other fortnights (4.57%–5.19%) (p < 0.05), which were similar. In PNM goats, the lactose content increased (from 3.27% to 3.72%). In both PN and SPEAM goats, milk density in the fourth fortnight (1.21 g/L) was higher than that from the first to the third fortnight (1.02–1.03 g/L). Thus, rations based on Pennisetum pedisellatum silage, maize bran, and groundnut haulm, whether fed on natural rangeland or in barns, did not influence the density or major chemical components of milk, but time did modify some milk components.

Amroun TT, Taleb-Ait Menguellet K, Assmani KL. 2023. Influence de la saison sur la qualité du lait de chèvres Kabyles en montagne en Algérie. http://www.lrrd.org/lrrd35/4/3530thil.html

Centre Technique de Coopération Agricole et rurale (CTA). 2015. L’élevage des chèvres-Conseils pratiques pour les petits éleveurs”, Agrodok.

Cirad.  2002. Memento de l’agronome, CIRAD-GRET, Ministère des Affaires étrangères, France.

Gnanda IB, Zoundi JS, Nianogo AJ, Le Masson A, Meyer C. 2005. Performances laitières et pondérales de la chèvre du Sahel burkinabé en régime de complémentation basé sur l’utilisation des ressources alimentaires locales. Revue d’élevage et de médecine vétérinaire des Pays Tropicaux 58 (3), 175–182. https://doi.org/10.19182/remvt.9930

INSD. 2021. Annuaire statistique 2018 de la région du Centre-Nord. Annuaires statistiques, Institut.

Koudougou H. 2018. Processus de production d’un ensilage à base de plantes entières de maïs (Zea mays L.), de sorgho (Sorghum bicolor L.) et de mil (Pennisetum glaucum (L.) R. Br) et évaluation de sa valeur nutritive. Mémoire de fin d’ingénieur du développement rural. IDR. Burkina Faso. 65p.

Millogo V, Kéré M, Sissao M, Sidibé-Anogo AG, Koudougou H, Burdick R, Harrigan T. 2021. A chopper as appropriate tool for livestock production and effects on silage nutritive characteristics based-maize-sorghum and millet in Burkina Faso. International Journal of Applied Science and Research, 2581-7876.

MRA. 2007. Diagnostic des filières bétail-viande et petits ruminants du Burkina Faso, Rapport final, AGRER-Statistika, 144p.

Onzima RB, Upadhyay MR, Doekes HP, Brito LF, Huson HJ. 2018. “Genome-wide characterization of selection signatures and runs of homozygosity in Ugandan goat breeds.” Frontiers in Genetics 9, 1-13. https://doi.org/10.3389/fgene.2018.00318.

Sanon HO, Traoré L. 2014. Typologie d’ateliers d’embouche ovine au Burkina Faso (Ouest) et performances des unités pilotes. Livestock Research for Rural Development 26 (10) 2014.

Sanou KF, Ouédraogo S, Nacro S, Ouédraogo M, Kaboré-Zoungrana C. 2016. Durabilité de l’offre et valeur nutritive des fourrages commercialisés en zone urbaine de Bobo Dioulasso, Burkina Faso. Cahiers Agriculture 25, 15002.

Schmidely P, Morand-Fehr P.  Sauvant D. 2005. Influence of Extruded Soybeans With or Without Bicarbonate on Milk Performance and Fatty Acid Composition of Goat Milk. Journal of Dairy Science 88, 757-765.

Sissao M, Millogo V, Sidibé AG, Djikoldingam RR, Kéré M. 2024. Valeurs bromatologiques des fourrages ensilés en fûts plastiques et consommation volontaire chez les chèvres Djallonké au Burkina Faso. Sciences Naturelles et Appliquées 43(1), 9-27.

Sow F. 2021. Characteristics of goat farming and efficiency of digestive use of fodder in two breeds of goats, local (Sahelian) and imported (Majorera) in the Fatick area (Senegal). Thèse de Doctorat en Médecine Vétérinaire, Ecole Inter-Etats des Sciences et Médecine Vétérinaires de Dakar, Université Cheikh Anta Diop de Dakar, Dakar, Sénégal, 120p.

Zahraddeen D, Butswat ISR, Mbap ST. 2009. A note on factors influencing milk yield of local goats under semi-intensive system in Sudan savannah ecological zone of Nigeria. Livestock Research for Rural Development 21(3), 34.

Zantar S, Boujnah M, Toukour EA, Hassani ZM, Bakkali M, Laglaoui A. 2016. Caractérisation du lait de chèvre du Nord du Maroc. In : Napoléone M. (ed.), Ben Salem H. (ed.), Boutonnet J.P. (ed.), LópezFrancos A. (ed.), Gabiña D. (ed.). The value chains of Mediterranean sheep and goat products. Organisation of the industry, marketing strategies, feeding and production systems. Zaragoza : CIHEAM, p. 509-515 (Options Méditerranéennes: Série A. Séminaires Méditerranéens; n. 115).

Related Articles

Extraction of biologically active substances of fungi isolated from various ecosystems and evaluation of their effect

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, G. A. Tomuyeva, A. R. Hasanova, V. Y. Hasanova, A. M. Hasanov, S. E. Nagiyeva, A. G. Eyvazov, G. T. Huseynova, G. A. Qasimova, V. K. Isayeva, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 143-150, February 2026.

Integrative role of yeast culture metabolites in aquatic health and productivity

Sajjad Ur Rahman, Dur E Nayab, Rabia Kanwar*, Muhammad Mukarram Bashir, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 126-142, February 2026.

Land use efficiency and performance of sweet corn-cowpea intercropping influenced by temporal planting and methods of fertilizer application

Bryan Cristian M. Demolar, Marissa C. Hitalia*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 101-125, February 2026.

Illuminating the deficiency: Public awareness of vitamin- D in Lahore, Pakistan

Muhammad Zeeshan Arif*, Muhammad Arslan Shahid, Zeerak Laila, Ahmad Ali Shabbir, Farrukh Nadeem, M Muazzam Khan, Yousuf Shahjahan, Rajab Ali, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 91-100, February 2026.

Characteristics of symbiotic relationships between plants and bacteria and the influence of stress factors on them

Konul F. Bakhshaliyeva, Navai D. İmamquliyev, Mehpara İ. Gasımova, Sevda M. Muradova, Panah Z. Muradov*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 75-90, February 2026.

In the line of fire: Unmasking the institutional challenges in the bureau of fire protection

Mhelen Grace F. Libre, Nancy E. Aranjuez*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 53-74, February 2026.

One health approch: Diversity of domestic larval habitats and human responsibility in mosquito proliferation in Bobo-Dioulasso (Burkina Faso)

Zouéra Laouali, Kouamé Wilfred Ulrich Kouadio, Moussa Namountougou*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 38-52, February 2026.

Linkages between land use change, flooding, and water quality in the Pallikaranai Marshland, Chennai, India

Arunpandiyan Murugesan, Roshy Ann Mathews, Aarthi Mariappan, J. Ranjansri, Rajakumar Sundaram, Prashanthi Devi Marimuthu*, Int. J. Biosci. 28(2), 28-37, February 2026.