Welcome to International Network for Natural Sciences | INNSpub

Paper Details

Research Paper | December 1, 2011

VIEWS 1
| Download

Conservation and ecological characteristic of Trees in Tehsil Karak Pakistan

Musharaf Khan, Zabta Khan Shinwari, Shahana Musharaf

Key Words:


J. Bio. Env. Sci.1(6), 155-164, December 2011

Certification:

JBES 2011 [Generate Certificate]

Abstract

The present study documents the conservation status and ecological characteristic of 22 trees belonging to 16 families. Among these 12 species were found to be rare, vulnerable (6 species), Infrequent (2 species), endangered (one specie) and dominant (2 species) in Tehsil Karak, Pakistan. The conservation status of plants is determined according to IUCN 2001, Red Data List Categories and Criteria. After two years extensive field studies on the basis of questioner including availability of plant, collection of plant, growth of plant, plant parts, population size, geographic range and habitat we have concluded that Salvadora oleoides Decne. is endangered (EN) specie in Tehsil Karak.

VIEWS 1

Copyright © 2011
By Authors and International Network for
Natural Sciences (INNSPUB)
http://innspub.net
This article is published under the terms of the Creative
Commons Attribution Liscense 4.0

Conservation and ecological characteristic of Trees in Tehsil Karak Pakistan

Alam J, Ali SL. 2009. Conservation status of Astraglus gilgitensis Ali (Fabaceae): a critically endangered species in Gilgit district, Pakistan. Phyton 48(2), 211-223.

Anonymous. 2001. IUCN Red List Categories: Version 3.1. Species Survival Commission. IUCN, Gland, Switzerland & Cambridge, UK.

Anonymous. 2008. IUCN Red List of threatened species, www.iucnredlist.org cited on December 27th 2009.

Baggs JE, Maschinski J. 2000. Annual report on the long-term research on Purshia subintegra in the Verde Valley for 1999. Report to Arizona Department of Transportation, Phoenix, Arizona, USA.

Chaudri MN, Qureshi RA. 1991. Pakistan’s Endangered Flora –II. Pakistan Systematics 5(1- 2), 1-84.

Davis SD, Heywood VH, Hamilton AC. 1995. Centres of Plant Diversity: a guide and strategy for their conservation, Vol. 2 (Asia, Australasia and the Pacific). Cambridge: IUCN.

El-Keblawy A, Al-Rawai A. 2007. Impacts of the invasive exotic Prosopis juliflora (Sw.) D.C. on the native flora and soils of the UAE. Plant Ecology 190(1), 23-35.

Engler M. 2008. The Value of International Trade. Traffic Bulletin 22(1), 4-5.

Govaerts R. 2001. How many species of seed plants are there? Taxon 50(4), 1085-1090.

Hawksworth DL, Kalin-Arroyo MT. 1995. Magnitude and distribution of biodiversity. In: Global Biodiversity Assessment. (Ed.): V.H. Heywood. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge, UK; 107-192.

Hirway I, Goswami S. 2007. Valuation of Coastland Resources. The Case of Mangroves in Gujrat. Academic Foundation. India.

Huston MA. 1994. Biological Diversity: The Coexistence of Species on Changing Landscape. Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.

Khan M (2007). Ethnobotany of Tehsil Karak NWFP PAKISTAN. M.Phil Thesis. Kohat University of Science and Technology, Kohat, Khyber Pakhton Khawa, Pakistan.

Khan  M,  Musharaf  S,  Shinwari  ZK.  2011. Ethnobotanical importance of halophytes of Noshpho salt mine, District Karak, Pakistan. Research In Pharmaceutical Biotechnology 3(4), 46-52.

Kruckeberg AR, Rabinowitz D. 1985. Biological aspects of endemism in higher plants. Annual Reviews of Ecological Systematics 16, 447-479.

Myers N. 1988. Threatened Biotas: “Hotspots” in tropical forests. Environmentalist 8, 1-20.

Nasir YJ. 1991. Threatened plants of Pakistan. In: Plant Life of South Asia. (Eds.): S.I. Ali & A. Ghaffar. Shamim Press, Karachi, 229-234.

Noor M, Salam U, Khan MA. 1995. Allelopathic effects of Prosopis juliflora Swartz. Journal of Arid Environments. 31(1), 83-90.

Pallewatta N, Reaser JK, Gutierrez AT. 2003. Invasive alien species in South-Southeast Asia: National Reports & Directory of Resources. Global Invasive Species Programme, Cape Town, South Africa.

Pasiecznik N. 1999. Prosopis – pest or providence, weed or wonder tree? European Tropical Forest Research Network Newsletter.\ 28, 12-14.

Pieper RD. 1994. Ecological implications of livestock grazing. In: Ecological Implications of Livestock Herbivory in the West. (Eds.): M. Vavra, W.A. Laycock and R.D. Pieper. Society for Range Management, Denver, CO, 177-211.

Primental D, Lach L, Zuniga R, Morrison D. 2000. Environmental and economic costs of non- indigenous species in the United States. Bioscience 50, 53-65.

Rabinowitz D. 1981. Seven forms of rarity. In: The Biological Aspects of Rare Plant Conservation. (Ed.): H. Synge. Wiley & Sons Ltd. 205-217.

Sala OE, Chapin FS, Armesto JJ, Berlow E, BloomfieldJ, Dirzo R, Huber-Sanwald E, Huenneke LF, Jackson RB, KinzigA, Leemans R, LodgeDM, Mooney HA, Oesterheld M, Poff NL, Sykes MT, Walker BH, Walker N, Wall DH. 2000. Global Biodiversity Scenarios for the Year 2100. Science 287(5459), 1770-74.

Sudhersan C, Abo El-Nil M, Hussain J. 2003. Tissue culture technology for the conservation and propagation of certain native plants. Journal of Arid Environments 54, 133-147.

Wilcove DS, Rothstein D, Dubow J, Phillips A, Losos E. 1998. Quantifying threats to imperiled species in the United States. Bioscience 48, 607-615.

SUBMIT MANUSCRIPT

Style Switcher

Select Layout
Chose Color
Chose Pattren
Chose Background