Continental methane gas production and its implication to the global animal/livestock production

Paper Details

Research Paper 11/02/2023
Views (1339)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Continental methane gas production and its implication to the global animal/livestock production

Rodrin R. Rivera, Vincent T. Lapinig, Mar John B. Dauyo
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 22(2), 58-62, February 2023.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2023; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study utilized a descriptive type of research. Annual methane gas emissions were identified in each country worldwide. The amount of methane gas emission every year was utilized using secondary data available from the internet. In this study, the trend of methane gas emission is analyzed by getting its average concentration in a forty-two (42) year production from 1970-2012. The highest volume of methane gas is observed in Asia while the least volume is registered by the Australian continent. Symbolic regression was used for curve-fitting rather than the traditional model –based regression analysis. The results indicated that Asian continent has the highest methane gas outputs with volatility of trends over time. Most of the countries in Asia are developing or underdeveloped which have bigger space for rapid industrialization in the name of development. This could be attributed to its booming industries and high agriculture animal production. The production period of agricultural animals directly affects the concentration of methane gas because of the amount of their waste products that are soon to be decomposed by microorganisms. However, Australia has the most stagnant concentration of methane gas among all the sampled continents due to the fact that this continent was already highly revolutionized by computer modernization, and the production of agricultural animals was maintained for numerous years.

DeConto R, Polland D. 2016. Contribution of Antarctica to Past and Future Sea-level Rise. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles /nature.

Berndt A, Lemes A, Sakamoto L. 2013. The Impact of Brazillian livestock Production on Global Warming. Accessed on https://scholar.google. com.ph/

Frost P. 2001. The Potential Negative Impacts of Global Climate Change on the Tropical Montane Cloud Forest. Earth-Science Reviews volume 55

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014. Climate Change 2013, The Physical Science Basis, Retrieved from http://ipcc.ch/

Jevrejeva S, Moore JC, Grinsted A. 2012. “Sea Level Projections to AD250 with a New Generation of Climate Change Scenarios”. Journal of Global and Planetary Change volume 80.

Jiang X, Mira D, Cluff DL. 2016. The Combustion Mitigation of Methane as a Non-Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Gas.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2010. Ocean Acidification, Today and in the Future. www.climatechangewatch.noaa.gov/image2010/oceanacidificationtoday- and-in-the future.

Pound Ja, Fogden MPL, Campbell JH. 1994. Biological Respond to Climate Change on a Tropical Mountain Nature

Weitzman Martin. 2009. On Modelling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change. Reviewed from Economic and Statistic. (1).

Related Articles

Language and culture: Prerequisites for human capital development and enhanced household food security among vulnerable women farmers in Imo State, Nigeria

N. F. Nwulu, M. O. Igwenagu, G. U. Amadi, F. D. Anuonye, G. N. Ogbonna, C. F. Obumneke, S. U. Obasi, J. C. Onyeakazi, C. G. Iroagba, N. C. Anigbogu, K. U. Chukwu, C. G. Opara, E. N. Onuoha, N. U. Nzotta, C. R. Ayozie, B. N. Igbokwe, L. O. Duru, O. V. Obiagwu, C. I. Ahumaraeze, U. A. Agwuocha, J. U. Chikaire*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 1-16, June 2026.

Ziziphus spina-christi as a bioindicator of heavy metals (Cu, Cd) in Baghdad, Iraq

Israa Radhi Khudhair*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 45-49, May 2026.

Language choice for natural resource conservation and agricultural production information sharing and communication strategies for improved livelihoods among rural farmers in Southeast, Nigeria

N. F. Nwulu, C. F. Obumneke, S. U. Obasi, J. C. Onyeakazi, C. G. Iroagba, N. C. Anigbogu, K. U. Chukwu, C. G. Opara, E. N. Onuoha, C. R. Ayozie, B. N. Igbokwe, L. O. Duru, O. V. Obiagwu, M. O. Igwenagu, G. U. Amadi, F. D. Anuonye, G. N. Ogbonna, N. U. Nzotta, C. I. Ahumaraeze, U. A. Agwuocha, J. U. Chikaire*, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 27-44, May 2026.

Correlates of students’ beliefs on environmental protection: Awareness, compliance, and sociodemographic influences

Anderson G. Gonzales*, Cyrus Kelly Macabangon, Dexter Dumayag, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 18-26, May 2026.

Prevalence of phosphate solubilising bacteria in Muthupet Mangrove Reserve

S. Alice Keerthana, V. Shanmugaraju*, M. Poongothai, P. Arun, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 9-17, May 2026.

The bush mango value chain in South West Cameroon: Governance, sustainability and emerging opportunities

Louis Njie Ndumbe*, Agbor Mc Nasare, Baliki Winifred, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(5), 1-8, May 2026.

General characteristics of the mycobiota of vegetable and melon plants cultivated in Azerbaijan

K. F. Bakhshaliyeva*, A. Kh. Rajabli, E. I. Allahverdiyev, A. G. Eyvazov, S. F. Azadaliyeva, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 139-145, April 2026.

Comparative assessment of plant biomass in the climatic zones of Burkina Faso

Alimata Zorom*, Yélézouomin Stéphane Corentin Somé, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(4), 129-138, April 2026.