Continental methane gas production and its implication to the global animal/livestock production

Paper Details

Research Paper 11/02/2023
Views (1356)
current_issue_feature_image
publication_file

Continental methane gas production and its implication to the global animal/livestock production

Rodrin R. Rivera, Vincent T. Lapinig, Mar John B. Dauyo
J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 22(2), 58-62, February 2023.
Copyright Statement: Copyright 2023; The Author(s).
License: CC BY-NC 4.0

Abstract

This study utilized a descriptive type of research. Annual methane gas emissions were identified in each country worldwide. The amount of methane gas emission every year was utilized using secondary data available from the internet. In this study, the trend of methane gas emission is analyzed by getting its average concentration in a forty-two (42) year production from 1970-2012. The highest volume of methane gas is observed in Asia while the least volume is registered by the Australian continent. Symbolic regression was used for curve-fitting rather than the traditional model –based regression analysis. The results indicated that Asian continent has the highest methane gas outputs with volatility of trends over time. Most of the countries in Asia are developing or underdeveloped which have bigger space for rapid industrialization in the name of development. This could be attributed to its booming industries and high agriculture animal production. The production period of agricultural animals directly affects the concentration of methane gas because of the amount of their waste products that are soon to be decomposed by microorganisms. However, Australia has the most stagnant concentration of methane gas among all the sampled continents due to the fact that this continent was already highly revolutionized by computer modernization, and the production of agricultural animals was maintained for numerous years.

DeConto R, Polland D. 2016. Contribution of Antarctica to Past and Future Sea-level Rise. Retrieved from https://www.nature.com/articles /nature.

Berndt A, Lemes A, Sakamoto L. 2013. The Impact of Brazillian livestock Production on Global Warming. Accessed on https://scholar.google. com.ph/

Frost P. 2001. The Potential Negative Impacts of Global Climate Change on the Tropical Montane Cloud Forest. Earth-Science Reviews volume 55

Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change (IPCC). 2014. Climate Change 2013, The Physical Science Basis, Retrieved from http://ipcc.ch/

Jevrejeva S, Moore JC, Grinsted A. 2012. “Sea Level Projections to AD250 with a New Generation of Climate Change Scenarios”. Journal of Global and Planetary Change volume 80.

Jiang X, Mira D, Cluff DL. 2016. The Combustion Mitigation of Methane as a Non-Carbon Dioxide Greenhouse Gas.

National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA). 2010. Ocean Acidification, Today and in the Future. www.climatechangewatch.noaa.gov/image2010/oceanacidificationtoday- and-in-the future.

Pound Ja, Fogden MPL, Campbell JH. 1994. Biological Respond to Climate Change on a Tropical Mountain Nature

Weitzman Martin. 2009. On Modelling and Interpreting the Economics of Catastrophic Climate Change. Reviewed from Economic and Statistic. (1).

Related Articles

In vitro assessment of Bambara groundnut M3 mutant genotypes for resistance to Macrophomina phaseolina (Tassi) Goid. in the seedling stage in Burkina Faso

Brahime Tingueri*, Souleymane Ouattara, Adjima Ouoba, Romain W. Soalla, Mahamadi Hamed Ouedraogo, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 141-149, June 2026.

Impact of Beauveria bassiana and Metarhizium anisopliae on biochemical and antioxidant enzymes in Rhynchophorus ferrugineus (Olivier) infesting oil palm

M. Malarvizhi, N. Santhana Bharathi, K. Sujatha*, A. Vijaya Anand, R. Manikandan, J. P. Antony Prabhu, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 129-140, June 2026.

Typhoon risk perception and preparedness after Sendong in Bayug Island

Dinah Millendez*, Lex Rei Brendon Hilario, Jay Rey Alovera, Elizabeth Edan Albiento, Melgie Alas, Peter Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 120-128, June 2026.

Floristic composition and woody species diversity in Campo-Ma’an National Park, South Cameroon

Achey Nkenfack Djike Baudelair*, Temgoua Lucie Félicité, Kuete Fogang Marcien, Nfondem Poumie Mohamed Mounir, Atoupka Abdel Malik, Djeuni Duplex Romuald, Kontchiachou Nkana Didier, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 103-119, June 2026.

Comparative effects of bio-inoculant on nutrient dynamics of biodegradable waste

Anjelle-J G. Debosura*, Carlo Stephen O. Moneva, Corazon V. Ligaray, Elizabeth Edan M. Albiento, MA. Cecilia V. Almeda, Melgie A. Alas, Frandel Louis S. Dagoc, Peter D. Suson, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 97-102, June 2026.

Impact of deforestation on the aquatic macroinvertebrate community and the ecological quality of Mé River (South-East, Côte d’Ivoire)

Gnago Dohou Affri*, Tapé Logboh David, Edia Oi Edia, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 80-96, June 2026.

Vulnerability and regeneration potential of Bambusa vulgaris in Ebolowa, South Cameroon

Rodine Tchiofo Lontsi*, Duchesse Elvira Kepmou, Emilienne Laure Ngahane, Jacques Christophe Awoa Essam, Isaac Blaise Djoko, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 68-79, June 2026.

Temporal availability of floral resources for the honey bee (Apis mellifera) in a forest ecosystem in the sudanian zone of Côte d’Ivoire: The case of Badenou classified forest

Dofoungo Koné*, Comlan Mawussi Koudegnan, Siendou Coulibaly, Fofana Séguéna, Bruno Marcel Iritié, Wandan Eboua Narcisse, J. Biodiv. & Environ. Sci. 28(6), 56-67, June 2026.